Dubstepforum.com

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 4:08 pm**

bellybelle wrote:
SD5 wrote:but the characteristic dissolution of self in a unity of two, however fleeting, also needs to be appreciated for it's transcendence of time,
for it's power to immortalize and universalize an individual's experience.
Know this?

that was a very lovely sentiment.

yeah, i have to agree here. i dont think "love" is purely biological - if it was relationships wouldn't last more than 9 1/2 weeks

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 4:18 pm**

love is being able to find someone hot who you can stand to be around all the time and they can manage to stand being around you all the time too. thats how i look at it

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 4:20 pm**

love is a neuro-chemical con job!

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 4:21 pm**

TheEvilGirl wrote:love is a neuro-chemical blow job!

a childish fix.

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 5:45 pm**

.. will see you all through this time.

Posted: **Sun May 25, 2008 1:57 am**

OMG ...so thought it was just a flirt and he says he was about to fall in love...

we hung out 3 times...as friends...

its kinda freakin me out and im so not feelin it

i seriously dont want to pursue it but i dont want to sound liek an uber bitch cuz he is mad sensitive.

what do i doooooo???

Posted: **Sun May 25, 2008 2:17 pm**

a barrel roll?

Posted: **Sun May 25, 2008 3:17 pm**

errr?

Posted: **Sun May 25, 2008 3:30 pm**

I can haz?

Did you mention butt sex or masturbation whistl you were conversing?

Because that would be two bullets..
..in addition to the one you admit, marked flirt..

Posted: **Sun May 25, 2008 4:27 pm**

PHEW.....homeboy likes to beat around the bush rather then just saying what he wants...

he was talking about another girl.

but still hes getting annoying lol

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 5:30 am**

is the sweetest scent on the person you wake to

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 9:08 am**

is something that happens long time.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 9:25 am**

bellybelle wrote:(Love) is the sweetest scent on the person you wake to

Jeez, mate you really are hangin' out aren't you?

Aroma does become important
but methinks this sexual, not essentially love.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 9:26 am**

Accidental double but gives me chance to contemplate out loud:

are sex and romantic love inextricably entwined?

can't a frigid dame and an impotent bloke fall in love with each other, without it being a form of mutual frustration?

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 9:27 am**

SD5 wrote:
bellybelle wrote:(Love) is the sweetest scent on the person you wake to

Jeez, mate you really are hangin' out aren't you?

Aroma does become important
but methinks this sexual, not essentially love.

theyre called Pheromones....strictly hormonal. Much like the emotional breakdowns u get when youre menstrual.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 9:32 am**

So you can write it off as just chemical and emotional right?

Suspect answer is No, cos you're that ultimate unfathomable: a woman.
However,
perhaps another subject,
I can never quite understand what women see in men.
Even when I can appreciate that a man is aesthetically attractive
I can't imagine the pleasure a woman presumably feels at being penetrated (dominated) by him...

Sometimes I think that it's just exploiting male libido to enjoy being lazily the centre of attention.
If so, it's a misread of male priapism in which the centre of attention remains self.

Rhetorical, don't want an explanation.

Again; sex ain't love, though lovers can share it.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 2:48 pm**

SD5 wrote:Again; sex ain't love, though lovers can share it.

so again...

bellybelle wrote:(Love) is the sweetest scent on the person you wake to

I mean, are we supposed to dismiss sex entirely? And the minute someone has a sexual thought, the possibility of it actually being Love goes out the window. Are we that sexually repressed as a culture/people that sex will always be bad, false, trite, base, even in the most decent unions, i.e. when two people love each other.....?

maybe i can translate the original statement into uncomplicated vernacular, which would make it this...

"Love is the best thing to smell on the person you're having sex with."

Crass and rude, to the point.

As for sex free...I dated a gent a few years back for 2 years and we never slept together for it. I felt I loved him, but being honest with myself, I found I would not be able to connect with him the way I should to have the love thing. That doesn't mean we failed because everything was strictly hormonal? Everything wasn't. But why should I deny the importance of sex to a happy love life? Yes there are jail couples and people separated by distance who love and don't touch....but I don't think they'd choose to abstain if put in the same place, especially if they love each other.

Lets just suppose not all people are having sex all willy nilly. Lets suppose that there are some people who are a bit more calculated and thoughtful in their approach--who view sex as not just a recreational activity, but as an opportunity to bond with a person and say things they are no longer able to articulate, through touch. Is it necessary to deny them the physical and spiritual benefits of coitus because we think of sex as base? Does our opinion of what sex has become detract from what it can mean between those who enjoy expressing their love this way?

Love making is a beautiful thing. Just because the movements are the same as fucking, it doesn't make it the same thing.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 2:52 pm**

This what you get.....

When you mess with loveeeeeeeeeeee

sorry had to, no one made a Radiohead reference in the thread yet.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 2:54 pm**

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 2:55 pm**

Von wrote:Wow.

lol@random Wow's in 08