The Reaper Q&A Thread
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Speaking of plugins...
If any of you who are relatively new to Reaper still (like me, been using it for almost a year and have literally only scratched the surface about 7 or 8%) -
Be sure you play around with the stock Cockos & 3rd party JS plugs.
Been using all these other plugs and only barely checked out a couple of the Reaper stock plugs until recently, and now I'm wishing I'd checked 'em out sooner! I'm not going to tell you what I think the hidden treasures in the lot are but there's quite a few. It's worth it to discover for yourself.
They also tend to be 'cleaner' both in terms of interface simplicity and sound as well as being much less hoggy for the CPU, if that's an issue for you. If there are fundamentals you kinda understand but not fully (like compression, limiting, MIDI routing, etc.) then these plugs are double bonus for you because their stripped-down GUI lets you see the bare bones parameters as they really are and not through some fancy animated visualization that's also fucking your processor...
For example, you can basically build your own CUSTOM modular synth this way. I built a badass bass synth with an FX chain like this: ReaSynth > Thunderkick > Tonifier > Distortion > Tremolo. Thing is big, bad, clear as day and totally beefy where it needs to be, and a minimum of tweaking produces a lot of different sounds. And best of all, it's so fuckin' easy to just rearrange the signal chain to experiment with different things - like putting the Distortion before the Tonifier, or using more than one Tonifier in the path, or... the possibilities are endless.
- "O Mighty Reaper, We Humbly Worship Thee..."
If any of you who are relatively new to Reaper still (like me, been using it for almost a year and have literally only scratched the surface about 7 or 8%) -
Be sure you play around with the stock Cockos & 3rd party JS plugs.
Been using all these other plugs and only barely checked out a couple of the Reaper stock plugs until recently, and now I'm wishing I'd checked 'em out sooner! I'm not going to tell you what I think the hidden treasures in the lot are but there's quite a few. It's worth it to discover for yourself.
They also tend to be 'cleaner' both in terms of interface simplicity and sound as well as being much less hoggy for the CPU, if that's an issue for you. If there are fundamentals you kinda understand but not fully (like compression, limiting, MIDI routing, etc.) then these plugs are double bonus for you because their stripped-down GUI lets you see the bare bones parameters as they really are and not through some fancy animated visualization that's also fucking your processor...
For example, you can basically build your own CUSTOM modular synth this way. I built a badass bass synth with an FX chain like this: ReaSynth > Thunderkick > Tonifier > Distortion > Tremolo. Thing is big, bad, clear as day and totally beefy where it needs to be, and a minimum of tweaking produces a lot of different sounds. And best of all, it's so fuckin' easy to just rearrange the signal chain to experiment with different things - like putting the Distortion before the Tonifier, or using more than one Tonifier in the path, or... the possibilities are endless.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Bah, that's old....Subside wrote:New update!
oh I forgot, people who use other programs have to wait months if not years for updates.... Reaper Dawminates
Download Reaper from http://www.reaper.fm/download.php right now and revel in its beauty!
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Jodorowsky wrote:Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Is there a way I can assign the left mouse button to select data instead of using the right mouse button.
The default way of selecting items is making me do this:
The default way of selecting items is making me do this:
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.
Time is running...
|
- frank grimes jr.
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: BOSTON
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Do you mean a bounding box selection with the left button?

Just because you are a character, does not mean you have character.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
I don't think it is possible to swap the selection marquee to the left button. 
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
frank grimes jr. wrote:Do you mean a bounding box selection with the left button?
Yeah
futures_untold wrote:I don't think it is possible to swap the selection marquee to the left button.
Damn.
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.
Time is running...
|
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
I was looking through the Options > Preferences > Mouse options but didn't see it anywhere. 
Kick up a fuss on the Reaper forums innit!
Kick up a fuss on the Reaper forums innit!
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Right, basic noob question, but...
When loading up a VST, I get two different windows that pop up. One is the VST gui, the other, is a guess Reapers preference windows (the one that has "show UI" on it. Sorry, I'm at work and don't have Reaper at hand). Is there a way to get rid of that other window so that I can have the VST gui displayed, or can I combine them somehow?
When loading up a VST, I get two different windows that pop up. One is the VST gui, the other, is a guess Reapers preference windows (the one that has "show UI" on it. Sorry, I'm at work and don't have Reaper at hand). Is there a way to get rid of that other window so that I can have the VST gui displayed, or can I combine them somehow?
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.
Time is running...
|
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Once you get used to it it's muuuuuch better this way. Keeps you from accidentally drawing in/deleting things when trying to select, etc. I went back to another daw to look at an old project and kept thinking "what the hell, why wouldn't they isolate selection from the other mouse functions?!"crytek wrote:Is there a way I can assign the left mouse button to select data instead of using the right mouse button.
The default way of selecting items is making me do this:
Reaper pwnz
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Weird. Can you screenshot that to confirm it's how it sounds [to me]? I take it you're on a PC too - which OS?crytek wrote:Right, basic noob question, but...
When loading up a VST, I get two different windows that pop up. One is the VST gui, the other, is a guess Reapers preference windows (the one that has "show UI" on it. Sorry, I'm at work and don't have Reaper at hand). Is there a way to get rid of that other window so that I can have the VST gui displayed, or can I combine them somehow?
Basically, you usually have the option to toggle between the plug's own GUI or a barebones set of fader controls for the exact same parameters. It shouldn't show both at the same time though, that's funky.
Incidentally, lots of VST's have GUI's that are butt ugly and a challenge to use and when you start automating stuff w/ envelopes, having it switched to the barebones fader view helps a lot.
-
pirate exposer
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:51 pm
- Location: liberty city, miami
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Hey
I only use the Cockos and Stillwell plug ins and have been wondering whether I should purchase some of them, like Bad Bus Mojo for example. I like that it's the plain GUI. But I kind of feel cheap because on that stillwell sight they actually have a price for it (not expensive at all tbh). should I purchase it on principal even though I'm just paying for the graphic visualization?
other ones like Verbiage I should cop obviously.
I only use the Cockos and Stillwell plug ins and have been wondering whether I should purchase some of them, like Bad Bus Mojo for example. I like that it's the plain GUI. But I kind of feel cheap because on that stillwell sight they actually have a price for it (not expensive at all tbh). should I purchase it on principal even though I'm just paying for the graphic visualization?
other ones like Verbiage I should cop obviously.
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Was talking about this:alphacat wrote: Weird. Can you screenshot that to confirm it's how it sounds [to me]? I take it you're on a PC too - which OS?
Basically, you usually have the option to toggle between the plug's own GUI or a barebones set of fader controls for the exact same parameters. It shouldn't show both at the same time though, that's funky.
Incidentally, lots of VST's have GUI's that are butt ugly and a challenge to use and when you start automating stuff w/ envelopes, having it switched to the barebones fader view helps a lot.

A plug in comes up in two separate boxes. This is annoying when I click on the plugin, the smaller box comes up. Any way to merge the two or just get rid of the smaller one?
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.
Time is running...
|
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
Go into Options> Preferences> Plugins and untick the option that says 'Auto-float newly created FX windows'.
You may also need to right click in the FX gui windows top bar (where it says "BT Analogue Trackbox in the pic"), and click unfloat GUI. Reaper remembers the previous setting when floating and unfloating plugin windows. In any old projects, you may need to refloat the windows once more just so Reaper remembers the setting for that instance.
You may also need to right click in the FX gui windows top bar (where it says "BT Analogue Trackbox in the pic"), and click unfloat GUI. Reaper remembers the previous setting when floating and unfloating plugin windows. In any old projects, you may need to refloat the windows once more just so Reaper remembers the setting for that instance.
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
futures_untold wrote:Go into Options> Preferences> Plugins and untick the option that says 'Auto-float newly created FX windows'.
You may also need to right click in the FX gui windows top bar (where it says "BT Analogue Trackbox in the pic"), and click unfloat GUI. Reaper remembers the previous setting when floating and unfloating plugin windows. In any old projects, you may need to refloat the windows once more just so Reaper remembers the setting for that instance.
That was the ticket. One of my goals in the next few days it to read the manual throughly (Until then, ya stuck with my questions
Thanks bro helped a ton
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.
Time is running...
|
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
How do I split the frequencies of my bass lines in reaper, sorry if this was asked in here already.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: The Reaper Q&A Thread
I'm not sure Reaper has native frequency splitting.
The standard technique for any DAW is to create three (or how ever many bands you want) auxillary channels, then to use an EQ to define the frequencies of each band.
----------------------
So set up the following.
Create a new track to hold the audio you want to have split.
Create X amount of new tracks, and route the audio from the first track to all three tracks.
Create another track and send the output of the aux tracks to this which will act as the summing bus (volume control).
On each aux bus except for the first track and the summing bus, insert an EQ/filter. The first EQ needs to have a low pass filter, the second a band pass filter, the third a high pass filter etc. This way, you can set which frequencies pass on that channel. Insert any other effects you want after the EQ/filter which is acting as our splitter.
----------------------
Hope that makes sense and helps a bit.
Google frequency splitting tutorials if you get stuck, and do the same on Youtube.
Pat
The standard technique for any DAW is to create three (or how ever many bands you want) auxillary channels, then to use an EQ to define the frequencies of each band.
----------------------
So set up the following.
Create a new track to hold the audio you want to have split.
Create X amount of new tracks, and route the audio from the first track to all three tracks.
Create another track and send the output of the aux tracks to this which will act as the summing bus (volume control).
On each aux bus except for the first track and the summing bus, insert an EQ/filter. The first EQ needs to have a low pass filter, the second a band pass filter, the third a high pass filter etc. This way, you can set which frequencies pass on that channel. Insert any other effects you want after the EQ/filter which is acting as our splitter.
----------------------
Hope that makes sense and helps a bit.
Google frequency splitting tutorials if you get stuck, and do the same on Youtube.
Pat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests