Dubstepforum.com

To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

There's a fair old difference between sleeping with a willing girl who's turned up at your dressing room after a gig and groping a sedated teenager in a care home for the mentally ill.

magma wrote:To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

There's a fair old difference between sleeping with a willing girl who's turned up at your dressing room after a gig and groping a sedated teenager in a care home for the mentally ill.

So passive paedophilia vs. active paedophilia?

wub wrote:

magma wrote:To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

There's a fair old difference between sleeping with a willing girl who's turned up at your dressing room after a gig and groping a sedated teenager in a care home for the mentally ill.

So rapist vs. active paedophilia?

fix'd

wub wrote:

magma wrote:To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

There's a fair old difference between sleeping with a willing girl who's turned up at your dressing room after a gig and groping a sedated teenager in a care home for the mentally ill.

So passive paedophilia vs. active paedophilia?

My manager would say Proactive Vs Reactive.

Wouldnt it be rapist vs. passive paedophilia?

magma wrote:To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

Still shady. You can still easily determine a rough age of people, and if you go ahead and fuck someone that is blato a child, ur a paed bro.

Not as dark as Saville et al, but still, not really justifiable just because he had a good selection.

magma wrote:

wub wrote:

magma wrote:To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

There's a fair old difference between sleeping with a willing girl who's turned up at your dressing room after a gig and groping a sedated teenager in a care home for the mentally ill.

So passive paedophilia vs. active paedophilia?

My manager would say Proactive Vs Reactive.

TBH I'm surprised I didn't use those terms myself

Terpit wrote:Wouldnt it be rapist vs. passive paedophilia?

would it?

Magma, the passive pedophile.

But she told me she was 18.
Sir, she's clearly 12.

garethom wrote:

magma wrote:To be fair to the man, he does all but admit to fucking underage girls in his autobiography... though he says it was more a case of not checking the ages of girls queuing up to fuck him than actually actively seeking out kids like Saville or Glitter were doing.

Still shady. You can still easily determine a rough age of people, and if you go ahead and fuck someone that is blato a child, ur a paed bro.

Not as dark as Saville et al, but still, not really justifiable just because he had a good selection.

Yeah, I'm not saying he's clean and no, it's not acceptable especially when you're in your 20s or older... but I do remember being a teenager and let's be fair... not every 14 year old girl sleeping with of-age men is getting raped...

It's no excuse for not checking though, obviously.

And dressing up AS a schoolgirl was probably not the best way to quash rumours...

Nevalo wrote:

Terpit wrote:Wouldnt it be rapist vs. passive paedophilia?

would it?

Too many peado sub-genres to keep track of

Terpit wrote:

Nevalo wrote:

Terpit wrote:Wouldnt it be rapist vs. passive paedophilia?

would it?

Too many peado sub-genres to keep track of

chill-peado

peadbro

peadobreaks

Nevalo wrote:

Terpit wrote:

Nevalo wrote:

Terpit wrote:Wouldnt it be rapist vs. passive paedophilia?

would it?

Too many peado sub-genres to keep track of

chill-peado

peadbro

peadobreaks

oh fuck, cant forget saville-step & glittercore

My gang(nam style)

now i am in my late 20s i'm sure I'd probably not be able to tell the difference between a 16 yr old and a 14 yr old. Sleeping with a 16 year...whilst legal...is morally wrong to me. Over here (the 18 limit in the US is more tricky) the legal limit is so low that there should be no way you can 'accidentally' have sex with an underage girl.

lol some of you need to get off your moral high horse. Like the first thing you're going to do when girls are lining up to fuck you is check their ids

yeah...noone's ever gonna do that...but if the girl is 15, it's gonna be obvious she is too young for you.

how old is 15 really?