As an aside, Duggan was running away and was shot, Treyvon was shot after breaking the nose and splitting open the head of his shooter.
==
But the actual point is that Duggan and Treyvon were used or attempted to be used as catalyzing events in our respective societies.
Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
- bennyfroobs
- Posts: 4532
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
- Location: the rainy north
Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police
yep, both were pretty good excuses to pass a few "1984" bills, right?
did trayvon REALLY assault the guy? not sure i believe that one tbh. there was nothing about the kid assaulting him when the case first came around
did trayvon REALLY assault the guy? not sure i believe that one tbh. there was nothing about the kid assaulting him when the case first came around
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':
-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.
Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police
Yes, he really did assault him. If you didn't hear that it is likely for a reason. When he was shot, he was on top of Zimm pounding his head into the concrete.
Last edited by nowaysj on Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police
lol what 1984 bills have been passed in UK? other than cameras on police which is surely a good thing.
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.
Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police
Well, quite... but Duggan was running away from *the police trying to arrest him* - he was "profiled" as a criminal because he was a known criminal. Trayvon was profiled as a criminal by a civilian because he was young and black and had the nerve to walk around his own neighbourhood in the rain wearing rain proof clothing. It's difficult to compare the two really.nowaysj wrote:As an aside, Duggan was running away and was shot, Treyvon was shot after breaking the nose and splitting open the head of his shooter.
Duggan should never have been shot at and will hopefully lead to changes in the way our society lets our police use their guns, but Martin should never have even been spoken to and should (but seemingly won't) lead to changes in the way US society sees young, black men and entitled civilians who walk around carrying hand-cannons on the off chance they meet someone who looks a bit dodgy.
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Mark Duggan was not armed when shot by police
It's okay, you can admit it, if you've bought an item or two or ten for yourself.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests