But I wasn't on about that scenario and in no way was I saying you deserve to fail because a company is willing to accept a lower standard of work due to cost cuts.garethom wrote:Again, I don't agree with this. This presumes that companies will only look at the best person for the job, and not look at getting slightly less qualified or simply more people for a lot less money as part of cost cutting exercises.Muncey wrote: If a Romanian comes over and can't speak English but is more qualified than you at your job, you fully deserve to fail.
If my company cut me, and got in a guy from India (a lot of the dudes at my company are on 2 year placements from India anyway), who was less qualified than I am, but would do the job for half the salary I do and do it to an acceptable standard, I'd be pretty fucking offended if somebody told me I deserved to "fail" for expecting a fair market wage.
I was on about the scenario when foreigners come over and CAN do the work to your ability or even better, without even speaking the language. In that scenario why should you receive special help because you was born here? If a Romanian with no money, very little education and can barely speak the language IS as qualified as you at your job or they're better.. they deserve your job and you don't. (deserve to fail may have come across a bit strong).
I agree with your scenario but thats to do with companies and it makes no difference on immigration, its like if they get someone with half your qualifications or skills who is British to do your job for half the price... agreed this scenario is more common with foreigners but its not exclusively an immigration issue, its to do with companies profit maximizing.
