Page 8 of 11
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:56 pm
by darkmatteruk
Junglist wrote:Once again sorry to disappoint and come up with loads of excuses and sound like a broken record, but even you have to admit that £20 headphones + 4 hours does not = 4 minute, playable tune. I hade the imagination and the idea for the track but agree 100% it did not pull offf, mabey with some more time it would do, either way the offers their.
fair play to you junglist man, you knew the tune wasnt up to standards before you upped it, but atleast you upped it. tbh when this thread was started i found it rather cringe worthy, but you lot who are coming back with"your tune is a joke", well thats even worse
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:02 pm
by junglist
darkmatterUK wrote:Junglist wrote:Once again sorry to disappoint and come up with loads of excuses and sound like a broken record, but even you have to admit that £20 headphones + 4 hours does not = 4 minute, playable tune. I hade the imagination and the idea for the track but agree 100% it did not pull offf, mabey with some more time it would do, either way the offers their.
fair play to you junglist man, you knew the tune wasnt up to standards before you upped it, but atleast you upped it. tbh when this thread was started i found it rather cringe worthy, but you lot who are coming back with"your tune is a joke", well thats even worse
Thanks, I knew I wouldn't win when I entered this duel because of my time and equipment restraints as well as the fact that I checked out Audiowrites myspace before I entered. And even though it was playable (yet cheesy generic wooble filled tripe) it was still what is liked from mainstream dubstep listeners. Whereas I have nowhere near the amount of experience I still gave it a shot and uploaded my work.
And I will retire from the forum at the end of this but will probably return under a different name because I feel I have alot to offer this forum, a lot more that Just Rob anyway.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:07 pm
by wub
Sorry, not meaning to play devil's advocate here, but doesn't this;
Junglist wrote:
Whereas I have nowhere near the amount of experience I still gave it a shot and uploaded my work.
conflict with this;
Junglist wrote:
And yes I do have the expertise because I have used every one of the programs listed for at least a good 20 - 25 hours minimum, if not into the hundreds of hours range.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:11 pm
by junglist
Wub wrote:
Yes I have the experience with the programs and using them, but as I also said I hardly ever finish any tunes... so in that respect I still say I do not have as much experience making tunes as Just Rob, I do however have more experience using the programs.
To use an example, a programmer might have a better knowledge of Microsoft Word, but a famous writer can make better novels on it.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:15 pm
by wub
Junglist wrote:Wub wrote:
Yes I have the experience with the programs and using them, but as I also said I hardly ever finish any tunes... so in that respect I still say I do not have as much experience making tunes as Just Rob, I do however have more experience using the programs.
To use an example, a programmer might have a better knowledge of Microsoft Word, but a famous writer can make better novels on it.
So it was a lack of experience of finishing tunes that let you down?
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:20 pm
by junglist
Wub wrote:Junglist wrote:Wub wrote:
Yes I have the experience with the programs and using them, but as I also said I hardly ever finish any tunes... so in that respect I still say I do not have as much experience making tunes as Just Rob, I do however have more experience using the programs.
To use an example, a programmer might have a better knowledge of Microsoft Word, but a famous writer can make better novels on it.
So it was a lack of experience of finishing tunes that let you down?
Well not really more of a combination which I've stated above, time, equipment and yeah obviously finishing tunes. Although if I had, had more time I would have been able to do a much better job although I don not think this would be enough to win it rather give me less of a thrashing in the polls.
Deleted
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:50 pm
by curtamos
Deleted
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:54 pm
by direct feed
hmmmmm, sounds like that is all over with now. pretty clear now right?
"your my boy blue!"
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:00 pm
by daft cunt
Is it me or is it really getting annoying here?
I'm pretty sure the lesson's been learnt already.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:10 pm
by darkmatteruk
Daft tnuc wrote:Is it me or is it really getting annoying here?
I'm pretty sure the lesson's been learnt already.
the first post was pretty fucking annoying actually
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:12 pm
by wub
Daft tnuc wrote:Is it me or is it really getting annoying here?
I'm pretty sure the lesson's been learnt already.
So, in summary;
JustRob won.
But if Junglist had more time, better equipment and more experience of finishing tunes, he would've got more votes.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:21 pm
by truncated
how very silly.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:20 pm
by s15d
Predictably anti-climactic.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:22 pm
by james fox
what were you hoping for? tears before bedtime?
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:28 pm
by wub
james fox wrote:what were you hoping for? tears before bedtime?
At least someone writing their name in the show.
After all, this was just a pissing contest......
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:01 pm
by jolly wailer
Junglist wrote:
Yeah like I said in the pro tools thread i'd completed about 5% of my tracks, and obviously have nowhere near as much experience as justrob, the problem was getting the sub to have some power because all the other sound used to make it sound dirty were taking up headroom, i thing alot more compression was needed and obviously alot more time + sub.
I don't think adding compression is the answer to this problem. Take out whatever you were running through a fucking bitcrusher and just turn the volume up on the sub. geesh.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:47 pm
by kindofblue272
so who's got winner?
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:17 pm
by surface_tension
glottis5 wrote:Junglist wrote:Surface_Tension wrote:Gold Diaper could be released, TBH. That first shit was a joke. FTL.
Thanks for the constructive critique fuck face!
I made that 'tune' in under 4 hours...
The song wasn't long enough or Mastered to any degree but how was it 'shit' I guess because it didn't sound like your wobbly, clean America turd dubstep, that all sound a bit too much like it's Rusko & Caspa it doesn't pass your 'not shit' grade. A fair comment would say what you didn't like about it. Hell looking at your comments I couldn't see one post in the Production forum? So you came in here first post... Did you boyfriend ring you on you 'cell phone' and tell you to check this shit out and then leave a comment like that? homophobe..
Wow, maybe you guys should have a tune battle to settle this
HAH. I'd be down. Will he be turning in something that is like, 1:10 in length and doesn't have any structure? Or was that the rules of this contest?
P.S. Junglist, do fuck off and spew your homophobic nonsense some place else.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:32 pm
by claw
hahahaha
surface tension ftw.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:34 pm
by deadly_habit
once i get my daw back up and running (fuck you smart status bad hard drive) beef of the week is on
