no, his name is Hughepochalypso wrote:Pip?
And am I the only one that would SLAY Gina?
and no you are not
no, his name is Hughepochalypso wrote:Pip?
And am I the only one that would SLAY Gina?
Tell me about it man, it shouldn't even be up for debate. No matter your opinion on the quality of his tunes, there's absolutely no denying that most of them have sub. If you have a system capable of producing down to 40hz at least you'll here it. It might not carry as much weight as say, Horrorshow, but saying it has 'zero' bass is completely false.cmgoodman1226 wrote:You're right man. His tunes have no bass, just like Mala's tunes have nothing above 100hz... This has got to be one of the dumbest arguments I've ever witnessed.joeki wrote:haha a guy drove by you in his boomcar and now you're sure Skrillex has sub bass in his tunes? And I'm the one making a fool of myself?
Haha. Whoops.ehbrums1 wrote:and isn't he french?Nevalo wrote:isnt that southpark?epochalypso wrote:Pip?
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
i don't listen to skrillex, barely listen to anything more than tearout, but have listened to the UK side of brostep.. it definitely has bass, but the reason it isn't bassweight or bassheavy (apart from the fact that it is brostep) is down to production headroom etc. you go make a brostep bassline, put a sub under it, play 1 bar of the brostep, then play 1 bar of the sub alone, there is a difference. (an no, not the lack of screechMaccaveli wrote:Tell me about it man, it shouldn't even be up for debate. Whether you think his tunes are good or complete shit (I'm pretty much in the middle but I can't listen to his shit mainly because of what it's associated with), there's absolutely no denying that most of them have sub. In fact it's usually in the 40-50hz range.cmgoodman1226 wrote:You're right man. His tunes have no bass, just like Mala's tunes have nothing above 100hz... This has got to be one of the dumbest arguments I've ever witnessed.joeki wrote:haha a guy drove by you in his boomcar and now you're sure Skrillex has sub bass in his tunes? And I'm the one making a fool of myself?
Joeki: yeah, you're the one making a fool of yourself here.
Giving away some remixes:incnic wrote:eat bass u r a wanker m8 lol
fuk off with ur shite prolems cos im trying to classofy dungeon vs classic dubstep ffs
The people of Vice are horrible "music journalists".pete bubonic wrote:This has to be one of the condescending patronising twattish piece of supposed journalism I have ever read. I don't rate Skrillex's music by any stretch of the term. But this writer just a tnuc parading around on some snobbish high horse. So what people like to get dressed up and do their thing. Fuck me. Suppose shouldn't expect better from Vice though.
Nah that's pretty much spot onBlueyTeamTom wrote:i don't listen to skrillex, barely listen to anything more than tearout, but have listened to the UK side of brostep.. it definitely has bass, but the reason it isn't bassweight or bassheavy (apart from the fact that it is brostep) is down to production headroom etc. you go make a brostep bassline, put a sub under it, play 1 bar of the brostep, then play 1 bar of the sub alone, there is a difference. (an no, not the lack of screech
i ain't into arguing though, if this is wrong, or whatever, i don't mind, just my 2 cents, and what i've noticed from experience
Ok. But you didn't explain what changed your mind about Skrillex's music.scrabbler wrote:I did the football thing when i was in the UK, i really embraced your culture, you guys had it going off, you shouldn't get drizzle in our bizzle just cause we are riding on top now.
Shum wrote:Yeah big up Jesus for dying for our sins and netting us a public holiday in the process.Nevalo wrote:not much todo at work today.... and once ive finished, ITS THE FUCKIN LONG WEEKEND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, hot cross buns.
Talk about condescending...Slime wrote:Then feel better after watching real journalist David Carr vaporise them in a clash stylee:pete bubonic wrote:This has to be one of the condescending patronising twattish piece of supposed journalism I have ever read. I don't rate Skrillex's music by any stretch of the term. But this writer just a tnuc parading around on some snobbish high horse. So what people like to get dressed up and do their thing. Fuck me. Suppose shouldn't expect better from Vice though.
skrill deffinitly uses a very low sub in some of his beats, didnt think he did until i heard a couple of his tracks through a home cinema system, pretty sure tht speakers didnt cost me mate 50k asweljoeki wrote:I never said there was zero bass in it, that was someone else.
But bass is not sub bass. And your 26hz story or whatever, I simply don't buy. And it doesn't matter either.
You're right, t's not as weighty as 'The Goat Stare" far from it, but even if it were, the midranges would just drown that out, which leaves you with the same problem. And I reckon, other than that guys car sound-system perhaps, you'll never be hearing schridkkxj on a 50k soundsystem in a propper setting either, ever. So the whole point is invalid.
The music isn't made for the sub. It's made for tearing out.
My assertion stands.
I sincerely hope you're trolling, because if you're not, you're an idiot.JTMMusicuk wrote:skrill deffinitly uses a very low sub in some of his beats, didnt think he did until i heard a couple of his tracks through a home cinema system, pretty sure tht speakers didnt cost me mate 50k asweljoeki wrote:I never said there was zero bass in it, that was someone else.
But bass is not sub bass. And your 26hz story or whatever, I simply don't buy. And it doesn't matter either.
You're right, t's not as weighty as 'The Goat Stare" far from it, but even if it were, the midranges would just drown that out, which leaves you with the same problem. And I reckon, other than that guys car sound-system perhaps, you'll never be hearing schridkkxj on a 50k soundsystem in a propper setting either, ever. So the whole point is invalid.
The music isn't made for the sub. It's made for tearing out.
My assertion stands.
fixedjoeki wrote: The music isn't made for the sub. It's made for bro-rape.
My assertion stands.
Giving away some remixes:incnic wrote:eat bass u r a wanker m8 lol
fuk off with ur shite prolems cos im trying to classofy dungeon vs classic dubstep ffs
was that 5.1 or 7.1?JTMMusicuk wrote:skrill deffinitly uses a very low sub in some of his beats, didnt think he did until i heard a couple of his tracks through a home cinema system, pretty sure tht speakers didnt cost me mate 50k asweljoeki wrote:I never said there was zero bass in it, that was someone else.
But bass is not sub bass. And your 26hz story or whatever, I simply don't buy. And it doesn't matter either.
You're right, t's not as weighty as 'The Goat Stare" far from it, but even if it were, the midranges would just drown that out, which leaves you with the same problem. And I reckon, other than that guys car sound-system perhaps, you'll never be hearing schridkkxj on a 50k soundsystem in a propper setting either, ever. So the whole point is invalid.
The music isn't made for the sub. It's made for tearing out.
My assertion stands.
i have not got a clue about home cinema setups, it had four tweeters/super tweeters around the room and a big fuckoff sub to go with so im gunna guess 7.1?Electric_Head wrote:was that 5.1 or 7.1?JTMMusicuk wrote:skrill deffinitly uses a very low sub in some of his beats, didnt think he did until i heard a couple of his tracks through a home cinema system, pretty sure tht speakers didnt cost me mate 50k asweljoeki wrote:I never said there was zero bass in it, that was someone else.
But bass is not sub bass. And your 26hz story or whatever, I simply don't buy. And it doesn't matter either.
You're right, t's not as weighty as 'The Goat Stare" far from it, but even if it were, the midranges would just drown that out, which leaves you with the same problem. And I reckon, other than that guys car sound-system perhaps, you'll never be hearing schridkkxj on a 50k soundsystem in a propper setting either, ever. So the whole point is invalid.
The music isn't made for the sub. It's made for tearing out.
My assertion stands.
im terribly confused, what were you refering to then?joeki wrote:hahahaha, you think I was talking about the prize of the system?
I love DSF.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests