Dubstepforum.com

Parson wrote:i'm sorry about your deficiency.

lol

thankyou parson...i'm sorry you have all the answers but not everyone is as enlightened as you..it must be tough

i'm just sayin. i am not into holding peoples' hands and explaining to them, but i did just that with these movies.

if you still don't understand how symbols work, i can't do nothin for ya man

Parson wrote:i'm just sayin. i am not into holding peoples' hands and explaining to them, but i did just that with these movies.

if you still don't understand how symbols work, i can't do nothin for ya man

man there just ain't any need for the rudeness

i am an extremely open minded person and i look into everything you post...i usually find within debate condescension doesn't help

bandshell wrote:

FAUST.DTC wrote:Do you think that perhaps Parson is just trolling us as he knows some of us will bite? He cant seriously be looking this deep into things can he?

I dunno. Either way, awesome thread. Big up parson and gram parsons.

Gram Parsons brap brap

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:i'm just sayin. i am not into holding peoples' hands and explaining to them, but i did just that with these movies.

if you still don't understand how symbols work, i can't do nothin for ya man

man there just ain't any need for the rudeness

i am an extremely open minded person and i look into everything you post...i usually find within debate condescension doesn't help

i took a lot of time to point stuff out that is obvious to me. if people took a min to look at the stuff in the frame and take it into the context of the narrative, the purposefulness couldn't be more clear.

if you don't see it, it is because you're being lazy and not taking the time to look closely.

and it is rude to not look closely and then announce a conclusion that it is not purposeful.

and at that point, you've lost me.

Parson wrote:

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:i'm just sayin. i am not into holding peoples' hands and explaining to them, but i did just that with these movies.

if you still don't understand how symbols work, i can't do nothin for ya man

man there just ain't any need for the rudeness

i am an extremely open minded person and i look into everything you post...i usually find within debate condescension doesn't help

i took a lot of time to point stuff out that is obvious to me. if people took a min to look at the stuff in the frame and take it into the context of the narrative, the purposefulness couldn't be more clear.

if you don't see it, it is because you're being lazy and not taking the time to look closely.

and it is rude to not look closely and then announce a conclusion that it is not purposeful.

and at that point, you've lost me.

i looked at all the pics mate...i see what you're saying but i haven't seen the films so don't know the narrative..

i think there is all kinds of fucked up shit subliminally put into films thats very obvious to me....this stuff i guess i don't understand why it would serve a purpose..

and your whole agree with me 100% or you're a douchebag who can fuck off stance is unpleasant...if you could perhaps listen to others a bit more regardless of whether you think you have all the answers and they know nothing then they will be willing to listen to you more..

refering to yourself being on a higher level or at least implying it is also unpleasant.....a truly wise man knows he knows nothing

thanks for the advice.

you should be more threatened by people who are quick to smile and agree though because they are the ones who wish to deceive you

Parson wrote:thanks for the advice.

you should be more threatened by people who are quick to smile and agree though because they are the ones who wish to deceive you

there is truth in that too of course....but i'm not asking you to agree...i' merely asking you to be polite and be willing to acknowledge the intelligence possessed by others even if they aren't totally on your wavelength...i think a lot of the stuff you've posted makes sense and agreed....im not even saying what you posted is wrong lol

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:thanks for the advice.

you should be more threatened by people who are quick to smile and agree though because they are the ones who wish to deceive you

there is truth in that too of course....but i'm not asking you to agree...i' merely asking you to be polite and be willing to acknowledge the intelligence possessed by others even if they aren't totally on your wavelength...i think a lot of the stuff you've posted makes sense and agreed....im not even saying what you posted is wrong lol

you said that the symbols i posted are not purposeful, which implies that i am seeing things that are not there.

and you haven't even seen the movies in question.

the levels of wrongness are thick.

luckily at least some of these movies are shit so if I ignore them am I free to bathe in my LSD solution bathtub absorbing enlightenment through every pore in my body without fear of being headfucked?

Parson wrote:

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:thanks for the advice.

you should be more threatened by people who are quick to smile and agree though because they are the ones who wish to deceive you

there is truth in that too of course....but i'm not asking you to agree...i' merely asking you to be polite and be willing to acknowledge the intelligence possessed by others even if they aren't totally on your wavelength...i think a lot of the stuff you've posted makes sense and agreed....im not even saying what you posted is wrong lol

you said that the symbols i posted are not purposeful, which implies that i am seeing things that are not there.

and you haven't even seen the movies in question.

the levels of wrongness are thick.

no i said i couldn't see it...not that you saw stuff that wasn't there...a huge difference...i guess on this subject i am ignorant....tbh the symbol thing just doesnt; interest me...if it's happening then it's of little consequence for me....just finished a book on the mayan and i found it interesting and informative...same for that vid that was posted up recently with icke, alex jones and others that was 2 hours long...i found it fascinating....

i never once said that freemasons are bad, that the symbols are going to fuck with your head, or that this is in any way controlling people.

these are good, wholesome stories in my book. the conquest of good over evil, and in the context of ancient tradition that is dressed in modernisms

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:thanks for the advice.

you should be more threatened by people who are quick to smile and agree though because they are the ones who wish to deceive you

there is truth in that too of course....but i'm not asking you to agree...i' merely asking you to be polite and be willing to acknowledge the intelligence possessed by others even if they aren't totally on your wavelength...i think a lot of the stuff you've posted makes sense and agreed....im not even saying what you posted is wrong lol

you said that the symbols i posted are not purposeful, which implies that i am seeing things that are not there.

and you haven't even seen the movies in question.

the levels of wrongness are thick.

no i said i couldn't see it...not that you saw stuff that wasn't there...a huge difference...i guess on this subject i am ignorant....tbh the symbol thing just doesnt; interest me...if it's happening then it's of little consequence for me....just finished a book on the mayan and i found it interesting and informative...same for that vid that was posted up recently with icke, alex jones and others that was 2 hours long...i found it fascinating....

there are more than a couple threads in this forum that don't interest me and that i don't post in.

Parson wrote:i never once said that freemasons are bad, that the symbols are going to fuck with your head, or that this is in any way controlling people.

these are good, wholesome stories in my book. the conquest of good over evil, and in the context of ancient tradition that is dressed in modernisms

sure...but i just don't find it that interesting man...no offence was intended and i wasn't even disagreeing with you to have an argument...i was just giving my (obviously unevolved) thoughts..

anyway peace & fucking...believe

checkerboards and pentagrams and mandalas and triangle lattices are not symbols of good or evil.

they are indicators of a different game being played right under your noses.

Parson wrote:

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:

Piston wrote:

Parson wrote:thanks for the advice.

you should be more threatened by people who are quick to smile and agree though because they are the ones who wish to deceive you

there is truth in that too of course....but i'm not asking you to agree...i' merely asking you to be polite and be willing to acknowledge the intelligence possessed by others even if they aren't totally on your wavelength...i think a lot of the stuff you've posted makes sense and agreed....im not even saying what you posted is wrong lol

you said that the symbols i posted are not purposeful, which implies that i am seeing things that are not there.

and you haven't even seen the movies in question.

the levels of wrongness are thick.

no i said i couldn't see it...not that you saw stuff that wasn't there...a huge difference...i guess on this subject i am ignorant....tbh the symbol thing just doesnt; interest me...if it's happening then it's of little consequence for me....just finished a book on the mayan and i found it interesting and informative...same for that vid that was posted up recently with icke, alex jones and others that was 2 hours long...i found it fascinating....

there are more than a couple threads in this forum that don't interest me and that i don't post in.

sure but your threads usually do...so i looked at it and gave my thoughts..

well if somebody showed up in your mayan thread and said the maya didn't know shit and anybody who thinks they knew shit is crazy, you'd probably not take the time to explain how that is incorrect.

might even lose patience with the mindset after being repeatedly subjected to it year after year

also gram parsons, jack parsons, and even mike parsons: all dons