Nah, it's a potato.Terpit wrote:ooh wait, was that rhetorical?
The hypocrisy of Theists
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
Science tells us how the world is it doesn't tell us how the world ought to be. If we discriminate based on science it's not a failing of science it's a failure of our morals.
I do want to return to the idea that religion and science are somehow telling us different stories of world or at least telling us stories of different parts of the world. It's a concept understood by some atheists and some religious. Non Overlapping Magisteria I think is flawed and I think suggesting that there are questions science can't answer is a pretty dangerous position to hold. Why would we close the door on what science can tell us? Another problem is that it cedes to religions some domain of responsibility that it hasn't earned and not earning that domain makes telling us of that domain less interesting.
I do want to return to the idea that religion and science are somehow telling us different stories of world or at least telling us stories of different parts of the world. It's a concept understood by some atheists and some religious. Non Overlapping Magisteria I think is flawed and I think suggesting that there are questions science can't answer is a pretty dangerous position to hold. Why would we close the door on what science can tell us? Another problem is that it cedes to religions some domain of responsibility that it hasn't earned and not earning that domain makes telling us of that domain less interesting.
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
SHAKING MY FUCKING HEAD
This is why I refuse to call myself an atheist. Ugh. People are so fuckign dumb
This is why I refuse to call myself an atheist. Ugh. People are so fuckign dumb

namsayin
:'0
-
BonerJams04
- Posts: 6889
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:26 am
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
wheres the fucking agnostic monument
butter_man wrote: who do you think taught you smoke tree's, OD'S, Ice cubes and DOC's?
God, thats who.

Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
I don't know.Reverb wrote:wheres the fucking agnostic monument

namsayin
:'0
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
given that agnostics can be either atheist or theist they have a choice
I'm not sure why anyone would be that arsed about the monument tbh
I'm not sure why anyone would be that arsed about the monument tbh
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
short but deepsd5 wrote:science can't create God
I can
Re: The hypocrisy of Theists
sd5 wrote:waddayathink?
my next tshirt:
pantheism...everybody prophets
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests