Dubstepforum.com

Terpit wrote:ooh wait, was that rhetorical?

Nah, it's a potato.

Science tells us how the world is it doesn't tell us how the world ought to be. If we discriminate based on science it's not a failing of science it's a failure of our morals.

I do want to return to the idea that religion and science are somehow telling us different stories of world or at least telling us stories of different parts of the world. It's a concept understood by some atheists and some religious. Non Overlapping Magisteria I think is flawed and I think suggesting that there are questions science can't answer is a pretty dangerous position to hold. Why would we close the door on what science can tell us? Another problem is that it cedes to religions some domain of responsibility that it hasn't earned and not earning that domain makes telling us of that domain less interesting.

SHAKING MY FUCKING HEAD

This is why I refuse to call myself an atheist. Ugh. People are so fuckign dumb

wheres the fucking agnostic monument

Reverb wrote:wheres the fucking agnostic monument

I don't know.

given that agnostics can be either atheist or theist they have a choice

I'm not sure why anyone would be that arsed about the monument tbh

science can't create God
I can

sd5 wrote:science can't create God
I can

short but deep

so my sexual partners say

waddayathink?
my next tshirt:
pantheism...everybody prophets

sd5 wrote:waddayathink?
my next tshirt:
pantheism...everybody prophets

I love it.

cool, I'll do a few
feel free at your end d'bunkt