Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:45 am
by panzar-rukkuz
Janner wrote:
having said that my supernova will always have a special place in my heart...
supernova's are badass ... !
I'm in love with my EMU e5000 for almost ten years now ... still rocks it all
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:19 pm
by catharsis
Headhunter wrote:tes la rok wrote:mixture of both i reckon...
true ! Same here
same here, though I find it easier to work with my hardware then to get vst's to do what I want them to do...
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:49 pm
by t-woc
Headhunter wrote:tes la rok wrote:mixture of both i reckon...
true ! Same here
i'll third that
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:22 pm
by two oh one
t-woc wrote:Headhunter wrote:tes la rok wrote:mixture of both i reckon...
true ! Same here
i'll third that
I'll forth it. Both are good for different things. Software is advancing so much quicker and a lot of 'hardware' is actually a small computer running software in a box with knobs on it these days.
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:04 pm
by panzar-rukkuz
glamour wrote:i'll swap my microkorg and my mother with anyone who can help me make z3ta do exactly what i want it to!
lol
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:12 pm
by toxin
reso wrote:Software all the way 'cause it's free!! And it saves loads of farting about with wires n that. I bloody hate wires. Plus software is now good enough to make bangin sounds on. this on a PC mind. Sure u can get cracks for mac though.
Freeness is Bliss
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:29 pm
by rwafish druid
two oh one wrote:
a lot of 'hardware' is actually a small computer running software in a box with knobs on it these days.
This is it.
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:56 am
by dj $hy
Hardware cos its richer in sound
But I use both in my studio...
PLUS... My TI is a VST too so do I call that hard or soft...
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:00 pm
by crash fistfight
I'm going with both, but theres nothing better than just pulling a synth onto your knee and messing about with sounds and melodies while watching the telly.