Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
ST100
Posts: 8665
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Post by ST100 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:30 pm

banksy fuckin sucks, foreal.

straight out of artschool, 'street art' foolery.

User avatar
stappard
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:56 am
Location: se5

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Post by stappard » Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:15 am

adamjames wrote:
z.u.bee wrote: is it me or does charlie brooker seem to be an expert on everything????
Charlie Brooker is the one.

Image

User avatar
fitz
Posts: 494
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Co. Kerry, Republic of 32
Contact:

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Post by fitz » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:30 pm

firky wrote:Am not even going to read it but I do have this bookmarked to pull out at whim for Banksy threads :D

Supposing ... Subversive genius Banksy is actually rubbish

o Charlie Brooker
o The Guardian, Friday 22 September 2006
o Article history

Here's a mystery for you. Renegade urban graffiti artist Banksy is clearly a guffhead of massive proportions, yet he's often feted as a genius straddling the bleeding edge of now. Why? Because his work looks dazzlingly clever to idiots. And apparently that'll do.

Banksy first became famous for his stencilled subversions of pop-culture images; one showed John Travolta and Samuel L Jackson in a famous pose from Pulp Fiction, with their guns replaced by bananas. What did it mean? Something to do with the glamourisation of violence, yeah? Never mind. It looked cool. Most importantly, it was accompanied by the name "BANKSY" in huge letters, so everyone knew who'd done it. This, of course, is the real message behind all of Banksy's work, despite any appearances to the contrary.

Take his political stuff. One featured that Vietnamese girl who had her clothes napalmed off. Ho-hum, a familiar image, you think. I'll just be on my way to my 9 to 5 desk job, mindless drone that I am. Then, with an astonished lurch, you notice sly, subversive genius Banksy has stencilled Mickey Mouse and Ronald McDonald either side of her.

Wham! The message hits you like a lead bus: America ... um ... war ... er ... Disney ... and stuff. Wow. In an instant, your worldview changes forever. Your eyes are opened. Staggering away, mind blown, you flick v-signs at a Burger King on the way home. Nice one Banksy! You've shown us the truth, yeah?

As if that wasn't irritating enough, Banksy's vague, pseudo-subversive preaching is often accompanied by a downright embarrassing hardnut swagger. His website is full of advice to other would-be graffiti bores, like: "be aware that going on a mission drunk out of your head will result in some truly spectacular artwork and at least one night in the cells". Woah, man - the cells!

He goes on to explain that "real villains" think graffiti is pointless - not because he wants you to agree with them, but because he wants you to know he's mates with a few tough-guy criminal types. Coz Banksy's an anarchalist what don't respect no law, innit?

One of his most imbecilic daubings depicts a monkey wearing a sandwich board with "lying to the police is never wrong" written on it. So presumably Ian Huntley was right then, Banksy? You absolute thundering backside.

Recently, our hero's made headlines by sneaking a dummy dressed in Guantánamo rags into Disneyland (once again fearlessly exposing Mickey Mouse's disgusting war criminal past), and defacing several hundred copies of Paris Hilton's new album (I haven't heard her CD, but I'm willing to bet it's far superior to Blur's godawful Think Tank, a useless bumdrizzle of an album, whose artwork was done by Banksy - presumably he spray-painted it on a brick and hurled it through EMI's window, yeah?).

Right now you can see some of Banksy's life-altering acts of genius for yourself at his LA exhibition Barely Legal (yeah? Yeah!), including a live elephant painted to blend in with some gaudy wallpaper. This apparently represents "the big issues some people choose to ignore" - ie pretty much anything from global poverty to Aids. But not, presumably, the fat-arsed, berk-pleasing rubbishness of Banksy. We're all keeping schtum about that one.



Makes some interesting, and accurate-ish points, but comes across, as he often ends to do, as a complete tnuc

User avatar
tacospheros
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: sing sing, NY

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Post by tacospheros » Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:51 am

I think I dislike Banksy-dislikers more than i dislike Banksy. Dude isn't a god or anything like that, but he's out there. And people are complaining they see him too much. Well that means he's been doing his job. Graff is about getting up .


Also to those saying his message is too obvious ? What if it wasn't obvious enough, would you complain that you don't understand it?


Anyone in the public eye is gonna get scrutinized. I'm sayin, he's far from my favorite, but I'm not mad at the guy either. I think Charlie Brooker on the other hand is a way more massive douche, that article read like one of Banksy's angry ex-girlfriends warning all the new girls to watch out for him





BTW I prefer OsGemeos any damn day.
wub wub wub wub wubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwub

http://lucidbackflips.wordpress.com/
@tacosphere tweet tweet, muthafucka

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests