Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
here's a mix where at least 50% of the tunes have drums that are overcompressed to lifelessness. Which is a shame as there are some good ideas.
http://soundcloud.com/fabric/el-b-j-da- ... -promo-mix
i hate to be a hater, but... I want to shout sometimes, if you don't know why you're compressing something, don't bother!
Ironically for me, the Funtcase track has some of the best drums on there. I pretty much hate his sound, but can't argue that his drums pretty much nail that style. the MRK1 track sounds big too.
http://soundcloud.com/fabric/el-b-j-da- ... -promo-mix
i hate to be a hater, but... I want to shout sometimes, if you don't know why you're compressing something, don't bother!
Ironically for me, the Funtcase track has some of the best drums on there. I pretty much hate his sound, but can't argue that his drums pretty much nail that style. the MRK1 track sounds big too.
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
lots of techno has really well done sidechaining - it really can make things seem much more dramatic.
trentemoller - the last resort uses it really well throughout
trentemoller - the last resort uses it really well throughout
http://www.soundcloud.com/gravity-music
Forthcoming on paradise lost...
Soundcloud
Free LP: http://www.archive.org/details/ZRD024LP
Quadrangular ep out now @ http://www.digital-tunes.net/artists/gravity
Hydraulic: http://www.digital-tunes.net/releases/u ... ication_lp
Forthcoming on paradise lost...
Soundcloud
Free LP: http://www.archive.org/details/ZRD024LP
Quadrangular ep out now @ http://www.digital-tunes.net/artists/gravity
Hydraulic: http://www.digital-tunes.net/releases/u ... ication_lp
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:10 pm
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
+1 for Ed Banger. That Mr. Flash tune off Ed Rec 3 ('Over The Top' i think) is fucking ridiculous.
The Bloody Beetroots earlier stuff is another savage compression-fest.
One thing i picked up off it is sidechaining an open hi-hat to the kick with a slow release so when the sound hits it gives massive impact. Cookie Monsta uses a pretty cool FX sample sidechain effect in one of his tracks aswell (can't remember which one, not really into his stuff that much) that sounds like the zap is pushing all the other stuff out of the way. Not something you'd do all the time but works well when placed in the right context.
Just listened to some old SebastiAN stuff, fuck that guy had it going on when releasing Walkman and Ross Ross Ross, shame they all seemed to lose their way. Seems like they missed their own boat.
The Bloody Beetroots earlier stuff is another savage compression-fest.
One thing i picked up off it is sidechaining an open hi-hat to the kick with a slow release so when the sound hits it gives massive impact. Cookie Monsta uses a pretty cool FX sample sidechain effect in one of his tracks aswell (can't remember which one, not really into his stuff that much) that sounds like the zap is pushing all the other stuff out of the way. Not something you'd do all the time but works well when placed in the right context.
Just listened to some old SebastiAN stuff, fuck that guy had it going on when releasing Walkman and Ross Ross Ross, shame they all seemed to lose their way. Seems like they missed their own boat.
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
the man is a GENIUS.gravity wrote:lots of techno has really well done sidechaining - it really can make things seem much more dramatic.
trentemoller - the last resort uses it really well throughout
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
It's not being a hater. There's literally no requirement to compress the mix bus if your music is going to be played extremely loud in a club.setspeed wrote:i hate to be a hater, but... I want to shout sometimes, if you don't know why you're compressing something, don't bother!
People don't seem to realise that by compressing their mix so hard the meters don't budge, they're distorting *everything*, and not in a good way, for absolutely nothing.
Unless, of course, the purpose of your music is to sell on Beatport or whatever, and you a) want it to sound super-loud through phones and computer speakers and b) don't really care how it sounds in a club.
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
FlyLo and HudMo instantly come to mind.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
current value uses it perfectly imo for extreme sounding but not sidechained almost square wave looking tunes
i love his drums and basses
i love his drums and basses
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Well, I asked and I did receive. That Running track is just absolutely the most crushed thing I've ever heard. It sounds exactly like heavy metal. I can't imagine any girls liking it.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
well no doubt cv uses his compression to sound like heavy metal and better than alot of metal lps hell it's hard dnb, but his older stuff used same technique and was dancefloor friendly. compression is an art in itself man. most dnb uses it to some extent, other genres you can hear it prevalent mainly the 4x4 stuffBodega wrote:Well, I asked and I did receive. That Running track is just absolutely the most crushed thing I've ever heard. It sounds exactly like heavy metal. I can't imagine any girls liking it.
dubstep i use it alot but not as noticeable.
https://download.yousendit.com/RmNEYUluTkFHa05FQlE9PQ latest wip with some soft and hardware compression on drums and soft on bass
oh and older cv
dunno how old you are but old hard dnb like shit cv and panacea came out with on old position chrome was great examples of using compression before it became a standard
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Most of the damaging compression is done post production. Either self mastering, poor mastering in general or maybe even the artist/label asked the ME to do it that way to be fair. A lot of times I prefer to play unmastered tunes when I play out so I get where you are coming from but if there isn't at least a little but or compression and or limiting it can be hard to get a good blend with a commercially released tune.Bodega wrote:It's not being a hater. There's literally no requirement to compress the mix bus if your music is going to be played extremely loud in a club.setspeed wrote:i hate to be a hater, but... I want to shout sometimes, if you don't know why you're compressing something, don't bother!
People don't seem to realise that by compressing their mix so hard the meters don't budge, they're distorting *everything*, and not in a good way, for absolutely nothing.
Unless, of course, the purpose of your music is to sell on Beatport or whatever, and you a) want it to sound super-loud through phones and computer speakers and b) don't really care how it sounds in a club.
I use sidechaining as a creative effect, not to smash the tune into square waves. Sometimes compression can even be used to create MORE dynamics. It isn't a clear cut thing. Another thing to consider is 99 times out of 100 the tune is not being heard on a club system this is why there should be a certain amount of loudness to a tune. For my label I like to have a balance where it is loud but preserves as much of the original dynamics / producers vision as possible. I for one would love to go back to the 70's and have these huge dynamic records but I am not exactly in the position to turn things around.
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
I'm old enough to have learned engineering before the "volume wars" started. It just seems so weird to me that all these dubstep and dnb producers are making tracks that are too squished to sound good played loud. I mean... it's dance music, yaknow? You play it loud.
To each their own, but to me the idea of making dance music for computers speakers is inconceivable. I would consider that electronic music, but not dance music.
Definitely poor or nonexistent (i.e. self) mastering, though. I used to do mastering for other artists and no sane mastering engineer would do what Current Value does to a tune. At that point it's an artistic decision and it's not the ME's job to make those.
To each their own, but to me the idea of making dance music for computers speakers is inconceivable. I would consider that electronic music, but not dance music.
Definitely poor or nonexistent (i.e. self) mastering, though. I used to do mastering for other artists and no sane mastering engineer would do what Current Value does to a tune. At that point it's an artistic decision and it's not the ME's job to make those.
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Your not that old. Listen to records from the 70's and then the 80's. It started 30 years ago, it has just taken this long to get to the point of being unbearable. To be fair I don't even think most electronic music is that bad. Listen to the shit on the radio, it's insane.Bodega wrote:I'm old enough to have learned engineering before the "volume wars" started. It just seems so weird to me that all these dubstep and dnb producers are making tracks that are too squished to sound good played loud. I mean... it's dance music, yaknow? You play it loud.
To each their own, but to me the idea of making dance music for computers speakers is inconceivable. I would consider that electronic music, but not dance music.
Definitely poor or nonexistent (i.e. self) mastering, though. I used to do mastering for other artists and no sane mastering engineer would do what Current Value does to a tune. At that point it's an artistic decision and it's not the ME's job to make those.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
abZ wrote:Your not that old. Listen to records from the 70's and then the 80's. It started 30 years ago, it has just taken this long to get to the point of being unbearable. To be fair I don't even think most electronic music is that bad. Listen to the shit on the radio, it's insane.Bodega wrote:I'm old enough to have learned engineering before the "volume wars" started. It just seems so weird to me that all these dubstep and dnb producers are making tracks that are too squished to sound good played loud. I mean... it's dance music, yaknow? You play it loud.
To each their own, but to me the idea of making dance music for computers speakers is inconceivable. I would consider that electronic music, but not dance music.
Definitely poor or nonexistent (i.e. self) mastering, though. I used to do mastering for other artists and no sane mastering engineer would do what Current Value does to a tune. At that point it's an artistic decision and it's not the ME's job to make those.

and youtibe kinda rapes cv tracks completely for when it comes to srisp compression you have to hear on wax or at least a 320 mp3 or wav
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Just to clarify, I'm not opposed to severe compression per se, just for any situation where you're producing music for a dancefloor.
So if Lady Gaga squashes her tracks, that's fine. She's making tracks for Youtube, radio and iPods, all of which demand compression.
So if Lady Gaga squashes her tracks, that's fine. She's making tracks for Youtube, radio and iPods, all of which demand compression.
- bokatordubstep
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:14 pm
- Location: ATX - masturbatin wit da bassbin
- Contact:
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

abz
that tune in ur sig is RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDEEEEEEEE
parson wrote:if borgore and kid rock had babies, they would come to bokator for tips on gamin'
http://www.myspace.com/bokatordubstepBasic A wrote:Fuckin with the Bokator, you fuckin with yo life. He dont play no games.
http://www.furthersound.com/bokator
STUPID FLY/BETAMORPH/5HZ/DUB CARTEL
-
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:40 am
- Location: Bay Area
- Contact:
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Muslimgauze had by far the best over compressed sound I've ever heard. Clark-Turning Dragon close second
- my_fickle_eye
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:50 pm
- Location: bangor and brighton
- Contact:
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
Turning dragon is an amazing albumknobgoblin wrote:Muslimgauze had by far the best over compressed sound I've ever heard. Clark-Turning Dragon close second
- MidnightMassDubstep
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:49 pm
- Location: Better Known as Fixxa
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
I'm starting to use alot of a very nice reverb/compression effect...
basically, get any sound (an 808 clap for instance) and add a reverb on it, with a fair bit of delay.
add a compressor, have the threshold pretty low, and the ratio very high.
give it a fairly long attack, to let the main bit of the clap through.
Adjust the release to taste.
It's basically a different and what I believe is a much more interesting way of the delay function on the reverb in the first place, 'cause it contrasts between the main punch of the sound and the soft easing into the reverb.
basically, get any sound (an 808 clap for instance) and add a reverb on it, with a fair bit of delay.
add a compressor, have the threshold pretty low, and the ratio very high.
give it a fairly long attack, to let the main bit of the clap through.
Adjust the release to taste.
It's basically a different and what I believe is a much more interesting way of the delay function on the reverb in the first place, 'cause it contrasts between the main punch of the sound and the soft easing into the reverb.
Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
i may be showing my ignorance here but are you saying that when club music is mastered it's not compressed?Bodega wrote:setspeed wrote:
There's literally no requirement to compress the mix bus if your music is going to be played extremely loud in a club.
because surely that's not true

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?
No, most club music is compressed. What I'm saying is that the constraints that compression solve (background noise and dynamic range) don't apply in a nightclub context, so a dj could easily play a set of uncompressed tunes. It would probably sound amazing, but the dj would have to bear in mind that the levels would fluctuate and not just set all the faders and trims to maximum.apathesis wrote:i may be showing my ignorance here but are you saying that when club music is mastered it's not compressed?Bodega wrote:setspeed wrote:
There's literally no requirement to compress the mix bus if your music is going to be played extremely loud in a club.
because surely that's not true
A lot of old acid-house era white labels didn't have any mastering as such.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests