Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
concervative teachers..
Page 2 of 2
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 1:38 pm
archers make a wonderful defence
allowing one to recover unhindered
allowing one to recover unhindered
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:56 am
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:35 am
underneath the archer's
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:47 am
mortified by*
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:39 am
I'm sorry, I can't spell for shit. Conservative was really stupid. 
But the rest, that's just quibbling man.
(you can use to quibble in this occasion right?)
But the rest, that's just quibbling man.
(you can use to quibble in this occasion right?)
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:54 am
on this occasion you may
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:58 am
FUUUUUUCCCKsd5 wrote:on this occasion you may
i'm so retardedyou have to forgive me though: in dutch we say "in dit geval", which would give in Enlgish: "in this occasion"... fuck
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 12:14 pm
hesus man
I was just joking..as i usually am
don't beat yourself up on my pedantry
I am an ignoramus about your language.
I was just joking..as i usually am
don't beat yourself up on my pedantry
I am an ignoramus about your language.
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 12:33 pm
i'm not beating myself up because of your pedentry, i'm beating myself up because i have english exam in 2 weeks.. (just secondary school btw, not college or whatever)sd5 wrote:hesus man
I was just joking..as i usually am
don't beat yourself up on my pedantry
I am an ignoramus about your language.
Re: concervative teachers..
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 1:30 pm
a teacher would be foolish to agree with a liberal position on drugs, could get them the sack.
but yeah it is damn unfortunate that 'drugs are bad mkay' is, as far as i can tell, always going to seem like a worthy reason not to decriminalize. you only have to look as far as holland or portugal to tell that it's a pretty good idea.
even if just smack was made available for free/cheap to all smackheads, hypothetically, provided they could prove they were already addicted to it, i'm pretty sure it would obliterate petty crime and take a decent chunk out of organized crime. but people just can't get their heads around it.
but yeah it is damn unfortunate that 'drugs are bad mkay' is, as far as i can tell, always going to seem like a worthy reason not to decriminalize. you only have to look as far as holland or portugal to tell that it's a pretty good idea.
even if just smack was made available for free/cheap to all smackheads, hypothetically, provided they could prove they were already addicted to it, i'm pretty sure it would obliterate petty crime and take a decent chunk out of organized crime. but people just can't get their heads around it.