government should look at this

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
firky
Posts: 10336
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:13 pm
Location: seckle is a tnuc
Contact:

Re: government should look at this

Post by firky » Fri May 28, 2010 3:49 pm

And the French.
Sound System Rental

Inventor of the Turban.

ResetTheAtari
Posts: 644
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:58 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: government should look at this

Post by ResetTheAtari » Fri May 28, 2010 4:28 pm

Perhaps if more folk in the UK had voted Lib Dems we might see legalisation or at least declassicifaction again, with the Tories in never gonna happen.
Old-school Piano Jungle inspired Dubstep - Soundcloud

User avatar
j_one
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: South East, UK
Contact:

Re: government should look at this

Post by j_one » Fri May 28, 2010 5:09 pm

Would have taken an impossible number to vote under the current voting system.

feral witchchild
Posts: 2021
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:49 am

Re: government should look at this

Post by feral witchchild » Fri May 28, 2010 5:22 pm

hackman wrote:
and decriminalised means legalise, that's why i was confused
Not really, it just means you won't be arrested for it - doesn't mean they can't fine you for possession or lock you up for intent to distribute and all that.
collige wrote:some stay dry and others feel the pain.

User avatar
DRTY
Posts: 7900
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth

Re: government should look at this

Post by DRTY » Fri May 28, 2010 6:54 pm

hackman wrote:or make alcohol illegal
Alcohol should be illegal imo. Fucks you up more than most drugs do.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: government should look at this

Post by magma » Fri May 28, 2010 7:17 pm

firky wrote:
magma wrote:
the acid never lies wrote: We need a massive "happening" to spark interest.... I've always liked the idea of a massive flashmob style joint-smoke in one of the London parks (or maybe coordinated in a few places across the country) with lots of cameras and no trouble whatsoever... but it'd only work if you got hundreds (minimum) involved.
Who's this 'we'? I smoke weed but I don't want to see it legalised and I don't want to be identified with those who do want it to be legalised. I see the real car crashes of the humble herb, the families literally torn about because someone was murdered for weed or just too stoned to drive and had a bad RTA.

As for "flashmobs", don't need them. There's hundreds of people blazing in London's parks everytime the sun is out, in the beer gardens of pubs where and at many of the free little festivals that are held outside over the summer. The less attention that receives the better, there's still places where the police turn a blind eye and you can skin up and blaze in public in this country, personally I think it's better not to make a big deal out of it.

(I know of a dozern pubs up and down the country which are more like amsterdam's coffee shops than pubs, I'd rather keep them out of hte eye of the public and media :))
Well, the 'we' I was talking about was people who agreed with that point of view... if you don't, then clearly the 'we' doesn't include you. I didn't say 'everybody', I said 'we'.

I agree that weed has the ability to wreck lives. I am also aware that alcohol wrecks lives. I don't see a problem with either being legally available for recreational use.

Yes, there are lots of people smoking in the parks and pubs, but the point of a PR exercise is to get people to take photographs, write articles, take videos... make the news. The idea isn't to get more people to smoke weed, it's to spark a debate in society about its legal status.

I realise you disagree with 'us' (again, this is a relative term that in this instance can't include yourself in case you're confused), but even in the wildest of my fantasies of a referendum you'll still get more than adequate opportunity to disagree and to vote against. The problem at the moment, it seems, is that yours is the only point of view being heard by the masses - or more importantly, the politicians.

(And perhaps if society took a little more grown up attitude to the drugs humans consume, those places wouldn't have to worry about media coverage... in fact, they might quite appreciate the marketing opportunities it offered... what an awful world I dream of.)
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

User avatar
honey-d
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: government should look at this

Post by honey-d » Sat May 29, 2010 12:00 am

Ah California, where the weed is just getting cheaper and higher grade
deranger wrote:It's like, one love, except if you're a stupid, drunk asshole that can't flow for shit.
AIM: Proletariantears

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: government should look at this

Post by nowaysj » Sat May 29, 2010 12:21 am

honey-d wrote:higher grade
It is getting too out of balance.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
AxeD
Posts: 9361
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Damstarem

Re: government should look at this

Post by AxeD » Sat May 29, 2010 12:31 am

It is legal... Ahh you never thought about that now, did you?
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.

User avatar
hayze99
Posts: 2383
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:53 am
Location: Cruising into the sunset

Re: government should look at this

Post by hayze99 » Sat May 29, 2010 12:35 am

Helix [Delay] wrote:
hackman wrote:me too, doesn't that article suggest the legal medical weed is running the illegal dealers out of business or am i being stupid, maybe i should read it again
It is.
That's why I'd rather it was decriminalized than legalized.
With legalization it's just going to be like cigarettes and everything's going to be full of chemicals and shit. Which I'd rather not have with my weed.
And then a market will grow for organic weed.

You got dollas in your pocket and the great big capitalist hand will deliver.

User avatar
AxeD
Posts: 9361
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Damstarem

Re: government should look at this

Post by AxeD » Sat May 29, 2010 12:43 am

Down here it's legal and there are a lot of shops around. Rarely any problems with it though.
Although one shop needed to close down coz there was an elementary school right across the street. The owner changed the name from Alem Coffeeshop to Alem Teashop and it's al good now.
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.

User avatar
honey-d
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: government should look at this

Post by honey-d » Sat May 29, 2010 2:10 am

nowaysj wrote:
honey-d wrote:higher grade
It is getting too out of balance.
eh? You mean the high grade is getting too strong or the mids are disappearing?

I only go to dispensaries for weed and I'm in socal so I don't really deal with mendicino or humbolt's outdoor grown strains much.
deranger wrote:It's like, one love, except if you're a stupid, drunk asshole that can't flow for shit.
AIM: Proletariantears

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: government should look at this

Post by nowaysj » Sat May 29, 2010 5:56 am

The chemical composition of the weed it getting all out of whack. No offense to the growers, but this stuff has been modified to increase profitability, to the detriment of the full complex blend of chemicals. I don't pretend to understand this, but I know that weed is very different than it was a while ago, and it's not that it's more "potent".
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
parson
Posts: 11311
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:26 am
Location: ATX
Contact:

Re: government should look at this

Post by parson » Sat May 29, 2010 6:48 am

petty laws are retarded

User avatar
parson
Posts: 11311
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:26 am
Location: ATX
Contact:

Re: government should look at this

Post by parson » Sat May 29, 2010 6:49 am

the law should be: don't be an asshole.

User avatar
kay
Posts: 7343
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: government should look at this

Post by kay » Sat May 29, 2010 9:20 am

It's all a major case of a poor workman blaming his tools. It's time people stopped blaming "tools" like drugs, tv, computer games and the like, and started looking at the root causes of society's ills. Which is in fact the structure of society itself and lack of self control amongst a proportion of the populace.

User avatar
the acid never lies
Posts: 3803
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: Brixton

Re: government should look at this

Post by the acid never lies » Sat May 29, 2010 10:19 am

kay wrote:lack of self control amongst a proportion of the populace.
You mean the proles? :P

User avatar
pets bud
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Los Angeles (occupied Mexico)

Re: government should look at this

Post by pets bud » Sat May 29, 2010 11:55 am

The government needs reasons to throw your ass in jail. They make money off people that way. They use tax payer money to militarize as much as possible. The more cops there are the safer the rich cats feel. Jails are a business. They are good for the government. They keep people employed and ignorant people thinking they are safe. They want to put minorities in there to tear each other apart. It's part of population control.
Soundcloud
Image
Im not saying im number one, oh sorry I lied, im number 1,2,3,4 and phive...

User avatar
kay
Posts: 7343
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:50 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: government should look at this

Post by kay » Sat May 29, 2010 1:05 pm

the acid never lies wrote:
kay wrote:lack of self control amongst a proportion of the populace.
You mean the proles? :P
Not really, just idiots.

User avatar
POND LIFE
Posts: 846
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Watford

Re: government should look at this

Post by POND LIFE » Sat May 29, 2010 1:37 pm

don't make the mistake of confusing the schizophrenia etc for bullshit. it's really not.
i'm up for decriminalisation - after all, what the hell's the point in it being illegal when everyone who wants to smoke it has access to it. but, imo it can easily fuck up lives and minds. yes, there is a lot of bullshit and propaganda to wade through and the truth can be hard to deduce. but you really can't argue that skunk has a serious negative impact on a pretty large proportion of its users' lives.
POND LIFE - various dirty halfstep sounds a la Watford/Southsea
http://www.myspace.com/pondlifemusic
proud member of GET HYPE COLLECTIVE
http://gethypecollective.blogspot.com/
Forthcoming releases on Code of Arms Records, New York
http://www.coa-records.com/

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests