Page 2 of 3

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:57 am
by kaiori breathe
legend4ry wrote:THIS ONLY COUNTS FOR SPAM BOTS! PLEASE DO NO POST USER NAMES OF THOSE YOU DON'T LIKE!
...

...

>_>

<_<

... Legend4ry

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:58 pm
by BLAHBLAHJAH
WOO!

NEW SPAMBOT RULES


Re: New spammer rules...

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:32 pm
by pete_bubonic
knell wrote:
Basic A wrote:Official bot rule #2 ... DONT REPLY TO THIER THREADS!!!
Rule 5) Learn to count and spellcheck (first of all, lest you sound like the mindless drones you herald against with such vigor) and also, understand the logic of the bots


they will not stop. it's a fact that all forums have to face. lock/delete/hate them all you want, they operate on traffic, as long as this forum generates traffic, they will continue.

that being said, the best way to fight them is to laugh and realize that they are silly, and the traffic they try to generate is a sign of the times, while waiting for the mods to do what they're here to do (aside from the rare exception of true forum misconduct)

true, you shouldnt reply, but if you do... who cares? its a negligible increase in a problem that will be constantly persistent. no arguing that... (unless you're a special kind of ignorant).

if you cant overlook spam, and it truly bothers you... i pity you. i really do. riding a moral high horse on bots is as asinine as the causes the bots propagate.
I've read this twice, and sections of it thrice. I fail to comprehend the reasoning behind someone so virulently trying to defend the rights of spambots and leaving them to clutter up the forum. I struggle to understand who you're having your little outcry at, the forum, the moderators, the moral leanings of removing spam bot postings?! I thought I would respond forthright, declaring that, on the off chance there is something affecting you directly or you have actual constructive criticism to offer then this would be a great place to air these helpful suggestions and/or anecdotes. However your post is drenched in bitterness and unfocussed miserable wanting and I fear being constructive was indeed, not your desired conclusion to your post.

At the end of this moral and somewhat post ironic meta dissection of your curious post, I came to the inevitable conclusion theres only one suitable response, imagine my chagrin when I continued on with the contents of this thread, only to discover it had already been delivered most comedically.
Basic A wrote:
cool story bro
Par.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:14 am
by 3za
Any one need a new sports bra, Tripwire is a girl right :6:
http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=132075
:P: :G:

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:23 am
by Tragic_Gash
3za wrote:Any one need a new sports bra, Tripwire is a girl right :6:
http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=132075
:P: :G:
yes, but why are bullet casings made out of brass?

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:11 pm
by 3za

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:09 am
by 3za

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:41 am
by Basic A

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:38 am
by surefya

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:05 am
by Technosaurus

Re: New spammer rules...

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:29 am
by tavravlavish
knell wrote:
Basic A wrote:Official bot rule #2 ... DONT REPLY TO THIER THREADS!!!
Rule 5) Learn to count and spellcheck (first of all, lest you sound like the mindless drones you herald against with such vigor) and also, understand the logic of the bots


they will not stop. it's a fact that all forums have to face. lock/delete/hate them all you want, they operate on traffic, as long as this forum generates traffic, they will continue.

that being said, the best way to fight them is to laugh and realize that they are silly, and the traffic they try to generate is a sign of the times, while waiting for the mods to do what they're here to do (aside from the rare exception of true forum misconduct)

true, you shouldnt reply, but if you do... who cares? its a negligible increase in a problem that will be constantly persistent. no arguing that... (unless you're a special kind of ignorant).

if you cant overlook spam, and it truly bothers you... i pity you. i really do. riding a moral high horse on bots is as asinine as the causes the bots propagate.
hahah what the hell is that? -q-

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:54 pm
by wub

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:56 pm
by wub
never mind

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:59 pm
by deadly_habit
phone65

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:19 pm
by 3za
nevermind...

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:10 am
by qwaycee_
AbReS

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:18 pm
by deadly_habit
Rustyz

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:27 pm
by Ongelegen
tomclancy

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:30 pm
by Rekah
Project EX wrote:tomclancy
was going to say that

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:09 am
by Trichome
Blue Lotus Apps