Dubstepforum.com

Neff wrote:

wub wrote:Anyone else think it's weird that No. 13 has received so many votes yet no one has responded to this thread bigging it up?

trying to get people to talk about your tune?

wub wrote:
Nope, I didn't enter

9 hands down, best sound design, good mixdown.

wtf 11? Decent track but totally missed the point

haha well done to all that entered!!!! I want to guide you through the complex ideas and musical references in mine, but sadly I'm to remain anonymous.

No offence guys but some of the entries to this are really piss poor :s I count my own track amongst them but seriously...some of you guys actually managed to make worse tracks than me 0.o

through decent speakers, (not my macbook ones) 4 is pretty tasty, props to whoevers that is

I know we aren't supposed to talk about who made what tracks, but I figured I should just let you all know that I'm responsible for numbers 4 through 13 (I threw 11 in there as a change of pace).

wub wrote:

Neff wrote:

wub wrote:Anyone else think it's weird that No. 13 has received so many votes yet no one has responded to this thread bigging it up?

trying to get people to talk about your tune?

wub wrote:
Nope, I didn't enter

I totally agree actually :s just heard this one and it's one of the poorer submissions definitely. I smell foul play afoot here XD

I also know which one is deadlys XD and I have to say I was expecting more :p

Imo the only track that's any good at all out of the whole lot is track 9. There's a couple that stand out from the rest as being 'sort of ok' whereas the rest are just totally rubbish or not brostep lol.

I pitched a couple of doctor p tracks down a few octaves and entered them as curveballs.

I suspect that self voting has been rife through this competition XD I was too honourable to go down that road myself though.

Is number 9 gonna be available as download at the end of the comp? :p

If I wanted to call further production shenanigans, I'd highlight these accounts as being suspicious;

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=144803

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=144801

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=144804


But hey, that would just be unnecessary scare mongering, and I in no way imply that irregular voting patterns have taken place in this contest.

good to see i'm not the only one who submitted crap i'll go with the majority here, 9's nice.

so, honest question: how long did you work on yours, everyone?
3-4 hours here, much of it wasted because some plugins started crashing on me

just sayin', if we had a 48 hour time limit people would have been more focused because its more serious right?
at least thats how i see it. then there wouldnt have been none of that starting over 4 or 5 times either

i spent all of 2 hrs tops on mine

wub wrote:If I wanted to call further production shenanigans, I'd highlight these accounts as being suspicious;

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=144803

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=144801

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=144804


But hey, that would just be unnecessary scare mongering, and I in no way imply that irregular voting patterns have taken place in this contest.

Ha, you can never really know can you. Though it is suspicious that that 3rd account which joined today has 1 comment, which makes reference to "the last 2 tune battles". hmmmm...

As for time on mine, did it all in a day/night/early hours. So pretty much just blasted it out all at once and got lucky, didnt have to start over or anything

I spent far too long on mine for the quality that resulted :\

I feel great shame.

Well at least you can confide in the fact that you participated! That's the most important thing about this, considereing 50 percent of the people who said they'd contribute didn't.

Siderealdb wrote:That's the most important thing about this, considereing 50 percent of the people who said they'd contribute didn't.

Did make me chuckle when I looked at the list of participants earlier

paravrais wrote:
I totally agree actually :s just heard this one and it's one of the poorer submissions definitely. I smell foul play afoot here XD

I also know which one is deadlys XD and I have to say I was expecting more :p

Imo the only track that's any good at all out of the whole lot is track 9. There's a couple that stand out from the rest as being 'sort of ok' whereas the rest are just totally rubbish or not brostep lol.

wanna drop me a private message as to which ones deadlys?

Well it kind of sucks at the same time. Cause song 1 has been played 86 times, and 9's been played 93 times. Whilst the average is probably near 50. So why would people keep skipping to 9? I personally liked 6, 14, 5 in all honesty.

yeah guys dont just take our word for it listen to em all dont be unfair on the other bros

The feedback I got from people was that they just enjoyed making the tunes.