Re: 10 traits of conspiracy worship
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:55 am
seckle get a fucking life lol
always seeking confrontation, you angry little man
always seeking confrontation, you angry little man
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
crackf wrote:reading most of these i think they apply pretty well to you, and your sudden accusationsseckle wrote:numbers 1 & 8 apply to many people in this subforum.
a number of times youve picked me and others out for no reason, or atleast reason you believe to be true when its not.
might find that a bit easier if he took mala's dick out of his assdeamonds wrote:seckle i think you would do better to just ignore that dumb shit and get on with your thing.
nicenice wrote:shit got real.
Numbers 1-10 apply to most people on this fucking forum. In fact you could probably find that it applies to some facet of every person on the planet in some way, shape or form.seckle wrote:numbers 1 & 8 apply to many people in this subforum.
The ridiculous thing is that in 1987 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) came to the conclusion that the diagnostic label of "schizophrenia" was not an accurate one:noam wrote:shit son i've been there before... can. of. worms.Genevieve wrote:A lot of these 'symptoms' bear a striking resemblance to ones you would expect in mental disorders related to schizophrenia.
If anything, I think it's overdiagnosed and sort of a waste-bin diagnosis that isn't overly well defined. But I don't believe that 'schizophrenia' is entirely fabricated. Just very, very, very poorly understood as of yet.test recordings wrote:The ridiculous thing is that in 1987 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) came to the conclusion that the diagnostic label of "schizophrenia" was not an accurate one:noam wrote:shit son i've been there before... can. of. worms.Genevieve wrote:A lot of these 'symptoms' bear a striking resemblance to ones you would expect in mental disorders related to schizophrenia.
"Despite extensive field testing of the DSM-III diagnostic criteria before their official adoption, experience with them since their publication had revealed , as expected, many instances in which the criteria were not entirely clear, were inconsistent across categories, or even contradictory"
Instead of finally admitting that research in to this specific diagnostic category was futile as there was not enough evidence to support it this quote is from the introduction of the 'revised' DSM-III-R.
There are 15 combinations of symptoms where no two people can be exhibiting the same symptoms yet grouped under the same diagnostic label as 'schizophrenic'! They don't even know properly how anti-psychotic drugs work either and they don't even work on 25% of people, they're generally a massive waste of time and people's lives and money would be better spent on rehabilitation that just locking people away in the first instance
this. even if it isn't related to conspiracy theories.Pistonsbeneath wrote:
i find it fascinating just to discuss things most people assume to be one truth when it doesnt appear to me to be the case
hackman wrote:might find that a bit easier if he took mala's dick out of his assdeamonds wrote:seckle i think you would do better to just ignore that dumb shit and get on with your thing.
OHNOHEDIDNT
but the funny thing is, its the same people getting upset in this thread, that are now trying to tell us that the article has no weight. look who went straight to insults. people can't handle reality in here. they want to live in their paranoia box, pointing fingers at everything.kay wrote:Numbers 1-10 apply to most people on this fucking forum. In fact you could probably find that it applies to some facet of every person on the planet in some way, shape or form.seckle wrote:numbers 1 & 8 apply to many people in this subforum.
does the thread title say dear hackman? calm down kid. everythings not always about you.hackman wrote:seckle get a fucking life lol
always seeking confrontation, you angry little man
this is the thing though. conspiracy people want badly to believe in their thinking, to the point that they project that reality. this is the point that the article is addressing.Pistonsbeneath wrote: i find it fascinating just to discuss things most people assume to be one truth when it doesnt appear to me to be the case
sounds familiar, like every religious personseckle wrote:this is the thing though. conspiracy people want badly to believe in their thinking, to the point that they project that reality. this is the point that the article is addressing.Pistonsbeneath wrote: i find it fascinating just to discuss things most people assume to be one truth when it doesnt appear to me to be the case