Dubstepforum.com

pete bubonic wrote:

mIrReN wrote:well, I first heard it through my headphones (which are good). But at a party it was like woaaah so 2 weeks ago I finally bought a soundsystem (small one 500 watt) and damnit, wtf, best thing I've bought in my entire life (besides my laptop obv.)

Small system?! 500 watts?!

mIrReN wrote:

pete bubonic wrote:

mIrReN wrote:well, I first heard it through my headphones (which are good). But at a party it was like woaaah so 2 weeks ago I finally bought a soundsystem (small one 500 watt) and damnit, wtf, best thing I've bought in my entire life (besides my laptop obv.)

Small system?! 500 watts?!

on it's best it's a 1000
like only need 50 more of those and I can play some Matty G =D

Edit; someone explain please "gangstastep" "metalbass" with examples :s

pete bubonic wrote:

mIrReN wrote:well, I first heard it through my headphones (which are good). But at a party it was like woaaah so 2 weeks ago I finally bought a soundsystem (small one 500 watt) and damnit, wtf, best thing I've bought in my entire life (besides my laptop obv.)

Small system?! 500 watts?!

brasco wrote:I got the inbuilt speakers on my laptop, when I'm ripping 128's from YouTube the midrange makes me want to do something to a relative and potentially find another relatives wedding ring

Rönin wrote:I haven't got the same opinion as Fractal. Personally if I was only listening stuffs like Loefah etc through my headphones (which are already quite good) I would already be like "yeah man this is cool". But to me, hearing Mud dropping on a powerful system at a party was like a revelation. Now listening to this only gives me a small clue about how big the tunes sound on a blazing system... The thing is that most people saying the "deeper" side of the sound is weak say that because they've never experienced it on a proper system. So yeah in a way I agree with OP, in a way brostep is "cheaper" because you get the essential of the music through pretty much anything. You need 20 000W to get what sub-bass is truly about.

slanguage wrote:you can basically hear everything it has to offer by listening to one or two tunes

slanguage wrote:

Rönin wrote:I haven't got the same opinion as Fractal. Personally if I was only listening stuffs like Loefah etc through my headphones (which are already quite good) I would already be like "yeah man this is cool". But to me, hearing Mud dropping on a powerful system at a party was like a revelation. Now listening to this only gives me a small clue about how big the tunes sound on a blazing system... The thing is that most people saying the "deeper" side of the sound is weak say that because they've never experienced it on a proper system. So yeah in a way I agree with OP, in a way brostep is "cheaper" because you get the essential of the music through pretty much anything. You need 20 000W to get what sub-bass is truly about.

*slowclap* exctly what i was trying to say...and icanican't's post was on point aswell


and before anyone says anything...i clearly stated i do like some of brostep so its not a hate thread...just me throwing an idea out there and seeing everyonelse's POV

fractal wrote:

slanguage wrote:

Rönin wrote:I haven't got the same opinion as Fractal. Personally if I was only listening stuffs like Loefah etc through my headphones (which are already quite good) I would already be like "yeah man this is cool". But to me, hearing Mud dropping on a powerful system at a party was like a revelation. Now listening to this only gives me a small clue about how big the tunes sound on a blazing system... The thing is that most people saying the "deeper" side of the sound is weak say that because they've never experienced it on a proper system. So yeah in a way I agree with OP, in a way brostep is "cheaper" because you get the essential of the music through pretty much anything. You need 20 000W to get what sub-bass is truly about.

*slowclap* exctly what i was trying to say...and icanican't's post was on point aswell


and before anyone says anything...i clearly stated i do like some of brostep so its not a hate thread...just me throwing an idea out there and seeing everyonelse's POV

*golf clap*
yes, everything sounds different on a system, bass heavy music especially. I wasnt disagreeing with that fact, I was stating that people like hype because they like it, not because of their laptop speakers

fractal wrote:Also, lol @ u need 20K watts to understand. I could blow your mind with 400 watts in a small studio or car!

fractal wrote:Also, lol @ u need 20K watts to understand. I could blow your mind with 400 watts in a small studio or car!

fractal wrote:Agree to disagree. So you're saying the same thing happened to DnB? People can't afford speakers so they just listen to midrange? What kind of speakers do I need to enjoy funky, which is neither "deep" nor "hype"? The problem with this thought process is that it pretends that hype and deep are the only two types of dubstep out there... What about wild rhythmic dubstep?

fractal wrote:the real question is metalbass or gangtastep?

Rönin wrote:... But here we're talking about the more midrange-focused side. And for me hearing that kind of sound on my ipod or in a party just doesn't change a thing, while with the more sub-bass focused tracks it's the complete opposite.

Rönin wrote: And for me hearing that kind of sound on my ipod or in a party just doesn't change a thing, while with the more sub-bass focused tracks it's the complete opposite.