Duffman wrote:I don't want to start my first post on a low, but me is dubstep dear. Every albums I look for seems to be at least £10, and I can't seem to pick up any cheap second hand copies. But then again I am alway skint.
Can you guys afford all the new and old releases?
Also, is there any good places to buy dubstep on the net?
not everyone can afford all releases obviously- just make a list each month, when money day comes then you can decide which ones you want/ can afford... in terms of places to shop, if you want vinyl, support your local record shop, search http://www.indierecordshop.org/ to find your nearest one. If not Chemical Records, Red-Eye and boomkat are good, and digital-tunes.net, trackitdown.net, and Juno are good
if you are into your music, i cant really see why shelling out significant amounts of money is a problem, if you dont wanna pay 4 it then you dont want it enough.
nitzdaking wrote: filestube?
get a fucking job, tnuc. half the people on this forum work their asses off to pay for beats
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:44 pm
by Duffman
Trust me whenever I get a job all my money will be going to new tunes and new music gear lol.
Just a bit shit atm since I would love to get some new albums and I don't want to illegally download them. I'm not a fan of paying for downloads either, if I pay for music I usually want a physical copy.
Also, cheers for the link, found a good few shops near me
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:36 pm
by Sageon
Dubstep made me surrender my social life.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:30 pm
by domhunt
Just looked at how much i've spent on Chemical Records in the past 5 months.
£400.85
;D
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:34 pm
by domhunt
Plus i've got loads of stuff from Piccadilly Records and Eastern Bloc in my city centre.
Plus Red Eye, Boomkat etcetc
I need to buy some new clothes...
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:39 pm
by murky21
domhunt wrote:
I need to buy some new clothes...
haha decent man
This tune pretty much says it all about buying tunes/ vinyl
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:48 pm
by James Wrongstar
brasco wrote:
dr hugo wrote:Discogs ruined my bank account
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:32 am
by Jak The lad
I remember spending £100+ a week on vinyl and coming out with about 10-15 tunes when I was younger.
Nowadays you can spend £100 on mp3's and come out with 100+ tunes.
Music is cheap.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:35 am
by ForbiddenFruitRecord
Duffman wrote:I don't want to start my first post on a low, but me is dubstep dear. Every albums I look for seems to be at least £10, and I can't seem to pick up any cheap second hand copies. But then again I am alway skint.
Can you guys afford all the new and old releases?
Also, is there any good places to buy dubstep on the net?
Depends how you look at it mate, the guys that make it need compensating for spending their time making it too.
Having grown up in the golden age of vinyl I can honestly say music is a hell of alot cheaper than ever before. Individual traks for £2 if you get wav format, vinyl was £5 at least.
£10 would get you couple of drinks gone in 15mins, how long and much pleasure will you get from the album? that would be my way of looking at it...
money making expert has an mp3 checker that hunts best deals if you want to save a few pence... Glad ya buying tunes tho ;p
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:58 am
by cheeba
vinyl hasnt gone up that much since 1989. my brother was paying £5 to £7 on tunes over 20 years ago.
problem now we have a generation of kids that think most music is free or cheap as penny sweet.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:00 am
by LA_Boxers
Jak The lad wrote:I remember spending £100+ a week on vinyl and coming out with about 10-15 tunes when I was younger.
Nowadays you can spend £100 on mp3's and come out with 100+ tunes.
Music is cheap.
This.
Used to spend 30-50quid a week on garage vinyls when i was younger. Got maybe 10 tracks out of that if i was lucky.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:19 am
by Jak The lad
LA_Boxers wrote:
Jak The lad wrote:I remember spending £100+ a week on vinyl and coming out with about 10-15 tunes when I was younger.
Nowadays you can spend £100 on mp3's and come out with 100+ tunes.
Music is cheap.
This.
Used to spend 30-50quid a week on garage vinyls when i was younger. Got maybe 10 tracks out of that if i was lucky.
Got to love nipping into HMV to find the latest garage stuff too. £3 vinyls on Relentless used to be the one.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:26 am
by DRTY
you should try booking an artist.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:37 am
by badger
cheeba wrote:problem now we have a generation of kids that think most music is free or cheap as penny sweet.
i spend an absolute fortune on vinyl each month but for people buying other formats (ie your average listener) music has never been cheaper
i think vinyl's got cheaper too tbh. i've been buying lots of second hand garage and some of it still has the original price stickers and a lot of them were 8/9 quid new which would be pretty unusual these days unless it's an import
Jak The lad wrote:Got to love nipping into HMV to find the latest garage stuff too. £3 vinyls on Relentless used to be the one.
hmv online is actually still really good for bigger releases. case in point being the james blake album on vinyl which is 24 quid in chemical and only 17 in hmv (with free delivery)
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:49 am
by LA_Boxers
Jak The lad wrote:
LA_Boxers wrote:
Jak The lad wrote:I remember spending £100+ a week on vinyl and coming out with about 10-15 tunes when I was younger.
Nowadays you can spend £100 on mp3's and come out with 100+ tunes.
Music is cheap.
This.
Used to spend 30-50quid a week on garage vinyls when i was younger. Got maybe 10 tracks out of that if i was lucky.
Got to love nipping into HMV to find the latest garage stuff too. £3 vinyls on Relentless used to be the one.
Yeah they were good days. Think i got 138 Trek for £1.99 from there. I remeber having to leave a deposit for the needles in the one on Croydon!!
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:54 am
by murky21
LA_Boxers wrote: I remeber having to leave a deposit for the needles in the one on Croydon!!
haha same in my local, everytime
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:00 pm
by Jak The lad
murky21 wrote:
LA_Boxers wrote: I remeber having to leave a deposit for the needles in the one on Croydon!!
haha same in my local, everytime
haah yup. Same with the one in Sutton. Used to get about 3-4 mates and spend ages using the 1 deck.
Then slipping 2 vinyls into 1 sleeve and pretending its a double release.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:48 pm
by nitzdaking
vinyl is dead
judge me
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:25 pm
by test_recordings
nitzdaking wrote:vinyl is dead
judge me
Why you? The statement is worth more of a debate, though it really isn't dead because people still use it... E.g. dubwise reggae, to say the least.
Re: Dubstep is Expensive
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:38 pm
by Sheff
nitzdaking wrote:vinyl is dead
judge me
the fuck outta here....
95% of the music i buy is on vinyl. and i buy a lot of music.
me is dubstep dear. Every albums I look for seems to be at least £10, and I can't seem to pick up any cheap second hand copies. But then again I am alway skint.
filestube?
