Datsik Bass? No Problem!

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by hasezwei » Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:43 pm

REAP3RMusic wrote:
collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:.
the skrillex bass in scatta however is probably layered with shittons of foley but fuck it i'll never figure that one out anyway ;-)
Basic A, while i totally respect never having listened to skrillex (his music is a metaphor for everything that's wrong with my generation) you should at least check the sound at 0:40 here.

that bass is only a simple wobble bass layered with 2-3 vocals run through vocoders...real obvious on that one.
Massive > Modern Talking in OSC1 > WT Position on full > Resample and split the frequencies > Low Pass filter on the high band > Overdrive on the mid band.
post results :6:

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by VirtualMark » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:02 pm

These threads make me laugh! Datsik bass from one oscillator on massive??? Yeah sure. Skrillex bass from modern talking?? Lol! Glad that mysterys cleared up.... :u:

User avatar
Ldizzy
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Ldizzy » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:22 pm

Virtualmark.. actually... my best patches were made out of one osc...

its all about how u tweak em...

skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by hasezwei » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:38 pm

Ldizzy wrote: skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
fastfoodish? i work at burger king and have no idea wtf you mean by that :lol:

collective
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by collective » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:41 pm

hasezwei wrote:
Ldizzy wrote: skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
fastfoodish? i work at burger king and have no idea wtf you mean by that :lol:

maybe thats why you work at burger king :6:

trypset
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:43 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by trypset » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:22 pm

collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:
Ldizzy wrote: skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
fastfoodish? i work at burger king and have no idea wtf you mean by that :lol:

maybe thats why you work at burger king :6:
I just laughed so hard. funny you are.

REAP3RMusic
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:10 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by REAP3RMusic » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:34 pm

The funny thing is, its more about the resampling in skrillex's stuff. Its 90% vocal bass and for that all it requires is one oscillator in massive and a shit load of processing. The other 10% is granular fucking synthesis...
collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:
Ldizzy wrote: skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
fastfoodish? i work at burger king and have no idea wtf you mean by that :lol:

maybe thats why you work at burger king :6:

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by hasezwei » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:46 pm

collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:
Ldizzy wrote: skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
fastfoodish? i work at burger king and have no idea wtf you mean by that :lol:

maybe thats why you work at burger king :6:
:corncry:

User avatar
CBK81
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:58 am

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by CBK81 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:20 pm

Yea skrillex sucks, it's so much harder to create a sine wave /sarcasm

User avatar
Johnst
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:31 am
Location: Philly
Contact:

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Johnst » Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:37 pm

hasezwei wrote:
REAP3RMusic wrote:
collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:.
the skrillex bass in scatta however is probably layered with shittons of foley but fuck it i'll never figure that one out anyway ;-)
Basic A, while i totally respect never having listened to skrillex (his music is a metaphor for everything that's wrong with my generation) you should at least check the sound at 0:40 here.

that bass is only a simple wobble bass layered with 2-3 vocals run through vocoders...real obvious on that one.
Massive > Modern Talking in OSC1 > WT Position on full > Resample and split the frequencies > Low Pass filter on the high band > Overdrive on the mid band.
post results :6:
+1 let's hear those roars!
Why is everyone dropping fish?

Soundcloud

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by jrisreal » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:38 am

i made a bass by myself (not expecting or trying to sound like datsik or excision) and I think it sounds datsik/excision-ISH ... not exactly like them but I wouldnt be surprised if they made something like it. theres two different basses that I am demonstrating (both made by me) ... no synthesizers were used in this (absolutely no synths)

well anyway here it is, I recorded the notes and automation live and without an idea of what I was planning to play, so prepare for sucky performance...just focus on the sound lol:
http://isrealgroup.5gigs.net/music/awsu ... esign1.mp3

EDIT: I think I figured out why this type of sound is so thick-sounding ... it has different basses each filtered to have its own individual frequency range that none of the others occupy and then when blended together, the final sound hits most, if not all, frequencies with equal volume.
Last edited by jrisreal on Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by jrisreal » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:57 am

hasezwei wrote:
Basic A wrote:
ramses020 wrote:
Basic A wrote:Massive > Osc 1 carbon > Unison to 5-8, enable wavetable position unison, set it to the very center of the slider, slightly to the left. lowpass 4 on filter 1, lfo its cutoff + osc amp 1, automate osc 1 position to get it talking, insert teletube in fx1 and the expander to fx2... Call it retreat/swagga...

Oh shit did I demystify that? Im sorry =/...
What is there to demystify? Basic starting point, basses like that are all about the processing anyways.

@OP, quite an ok bass, just don't think about it in terms of Datsik/Skrillex whatever.
Buuut, thats not a basic starting point, its a finished patch, and isnt gonna require jack for post-processing aside from a reverb to color it in with the rest of the track, just modulating whats in the synth and layering with a bunch of sweeps... worst case scenario, a filterbank, but no extreme post processing... I think a big part of what keeps these brostep sounds so out of peoples reach is there trying to turn them out using a bunch of distortion units and flangers and complicated effects chains shit when people should be more minimally minded and learn their synths... And even then, when learning the synths, they overcomplicate things, instead of realizing the simplest route is probably the correct one (isnt that like a law of physics?)... The resampling thing is to keep the filters moving, not to pile on 8million distortion units and shit.

The sounds should be right coming out of your synth. Always. Stop trying to polish turds with a million post-effects, and make simple, effective patches instead.

Bro basses are 99% of the time very basic patches like that, layered with a ton of sweeps. IDK what skrillex even sounds like, Ive never heard his music, so I cant comment on that, but, I think people GROSSLY overestimate the amount of post-processing being done to datscision sounds, and ignore the power of simple patches because of it. :W:

Simple things tend to be what sound most stunning. Its NOT all about processing. Its about efective sound design.

word on that. the magic of resampling in the signature datsik bass (you know, the one in 'boom' for example) is that they pasted together parts off a couple different versions of the same sound. they probably just looped it, played around with the filters and then picked what sounded good together.
the skrillex bass in scatta however is probably layered with shittons of foley but fuck it i'll never figure that one out anyway ;-)
Basic A, while i totally respect never having listened to skrillex (his music is a metaphor for everything that's wrong with my generation) you should at least check the sound at 0:40 here.


just saying, i hate the music but i can't help wanting to know the processes behind that bass. that's some hollywood sounddesign shit right there (maybe he just paid a studio to make that sound for him :6: )
My guess is that Skrillex is doing something so freaking simple and we as the dubstep community are too stupid to figure it out lol...I have a theory that he just screams into a microphone, granulize, distort, eq, automate, etc... not even using a vocoder, just screams
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by youthful_implants » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:41 am

some of this doesn't hurt.

Image

change the phase on your bassline, rotate it 90 degrees, have different widths for different sections. sounds RAD. ;)
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by jrisreal » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:53 am

youthful_implants wrote:some of this doesn't hurt.

Image

change the phase on your bassline, rotate it 90 degrees, have different widths for different sections. sounds RAD. ;)
sorry I dont even know what that is lol...im VERY new to synthesis
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

yuroq
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by yuroq » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:16 am

- Multi band delay

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by jrisreal » Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:30 pm

yuroq wrote:- Multi band delay
ok, whats that one called that you are using?
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

ninthy4
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Södertälje, Sweden

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by ninthy4 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:44 pm

jrisreal wrote:
yuroq wrote:- Multi band delay
ok, whats that one called that you are using?
izotope ozone 4

CoreyGoesRawr
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:33 am
Location: Tulsa,Oklahoma

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by CoreyGoesRawr » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:08 pm

youthful_implants wrote:some of this doesn't hurt.

Image

change the phase on your bassline, rotate it 90 degrees, have different widths for different sections. sounds RAD. ;)
Pretty colors...

User avatar
Ldizzy
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Ldizzy » Fri Mar 18, 2011 7:25 pm

youthful_implants wrote:some of this doesn't hurt.

Image

change the phase on your bassline, rotate it 90 degrees, have different widths for different sections. sounds RAD. ;)
be careful with that tho...

i know some datsik track that just fall apart in a club because of that...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm

User avatar
honey-d
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by honey-d » Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:22 pm

which one?
deranger wrote:It's like, one love, except if you're a stupid, drunk asshole that can't flow for shit.
AIM: Proletariantears

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests