Page 2 of 7

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:59 am
by deadly_habit
its just script kiddies with twitter
no real hacking has even come close to being done

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:09 am
by collige
deadly habit wrote:lulzsec is why encylopediadramatica changed domains
Encyclopediadramatica changed domains because Girlvinyl (the owner) decided to turn it into some retarded SFW Web 2.0 shit and closed down the original site. People got copies of the articles and rebuilt it.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:12 am
by wolf89
this all seems kind of silly

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:29 am
by legend4ry
I was so peev'd when minecraft went down haha.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:13 am
by wormcode
ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:16 am
by knell
deadly habit wrote:its just script kiddies with twitter
no real hacking has even come close to being done
arrogant script kiddies who have no idea of responsible disclosure, yet operate under the guise of it.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:25 am
by collige
wormcode wrote:ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Operation Anchorage is easily the worst one (even though some of it is really cool). Definitely play through Broken Steel, if not all of them, because Broken Steel increases the level cap and lets you keep playing past the original ending of the game.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:30 am
by wub
collige wrote:
wormcode wrote:ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Operation Anchorage is easily the worst one (even though some of it is really cool). Definitely play through Broken Steel, if not all of them, because Broken Steel increases the level cap and lets you keep playing past the original ending of the game.

Operation Anchorage has it's place IMO. Because of the linear structure of the missions, and the ammo/armour boosts throughout, you can play through it with a starter character. So escape the vault, get to Megaton, then immediately trek across and do Operation Anchorage.

If you play through it all the way and find all the briefcases, you'll bump about 5/6 levels, have access to all the quality stuff in the base at the end and most importantly you'll automatically receive power armour training from the start. Couple that with one of the items in the base being the winterised power armour (i.e. doesn't degrade) and it means you can batter your way through the earlier parts of the game.

Point Lookout was my favourite of the four - big fuck off map, loads of quality weapons and a proper storyline.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:47 am
by yoowan
^
funny that, point lookout was when I thought 'fuck this' and I haven't been on the game since

I dont know what it was about oblivion that I preferred so much more- maybe I just prefer rpg's with a magic based lore/set in the middle ages

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:13 am
by nowaysj
knell wrote:
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.

also they recently shut down the cia's website, too -q-
Hall of mirrors here. What would a legitimate group look like/do? How could you possibly discern the difference? Even if they are legit, they will be the tool because it will lead to full on net policing.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:23 am
by antipode
What a joke. /b/ was never good, but it really went downhill around brbchurch. The news coverage was a plebeian magnet. Calling anonymous a hacker group is like calling Skrillex dubstep. har har har.

Don't know much about lulzsec, but they don't sound much different from the retards that post on 4chan these days.

apart from /x/. love you guys.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:30 am
by Capture pt
funny thing is, neither of these "hacker" groups are anywhere near serious, or anywhere near the "big boys" of the "internet underground".

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:31 am
by Shum
Capture pt wrote:funny thing is, neither of these "hacker" groups are anywhere near serious, or anywhere near the "big boys" of the "internet underground".
Image

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:34 am
by Capture pt
nowaysj wrote:
knell wrote:
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.

also they recently shut down the cia's website, too -q-
Hall of mirrors here. What would a legitimate group look like/do? How could you possibly discern the difference? Even if they are legit, they will be the tool because it will lead to full on net policing.

a legitimate/proper hacker group wouldn't ever get caught, ever. they sneak in without detection and most definatly don't make press releases.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:45 am
by kingldub
wolf89 wrote:this all seems kind of silly
This.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:51 am
by wub
Shum wrote:
Capture pt wrote:funny thing is, neither of these "hacker" groups are anywhere near serious, or anywhere near the "big boys" of the "internet underground".
Image

"Check it out you guys! It's gotta built in 28.8Kbps modem!"

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:06 am
by Basstronomer
^ Classic :D

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:23 pm
by tacospheros
Capture pt wrote:
nowaysj wrote:
knell wrote:
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.

also they recently shut down the cia's website, too -q-
Hall of mirrors here. What would a legitimate group look like/do? How could you possibly discern the difference? Even if they are legit, they will be the tool because it will lead to full on net policing.

a legitimate/proper hacker group wouldn't ever get caught, ever. they sneak in without detection and most definatly don't make press releases.
THAT'S UNIVERSALLY STUPID !! sorry, Hackers is one of my favorite movies to quote

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:28 pm
by DRTY
collige wrote:
wormcode wrote:ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Operation Anchorage is easily the worst one (even though some of it is really cool). Definitely play through Broken Steel, if not all of them, because Broken Steel increases the level cap and lets you keep playing past the original ending of the game.
Don't waste your money on New Vegas... it's buggy to the point of being literally unplayable. Mine got to a point where I was on three Quests which had to be done to progress anywhere, all of which had bugs in which made it impossible to complete them. So pissed off.

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:33 pm
by kingGhost
buncha fuckin nerds. take your (supposed) talent and do something productive with it.