Dubstepforum.com

"Black Knight" Satellite

What is the "Black Knight" satellite? It is a mysterious satellite, of unknown origin, discovered in 1960 which shadowed Sputnik. It is believed to have been of extraterrestrial origin, and signaled back old radio waves from the 1920s and 1930s before it disappeared. In short wave patterns analyzed by astronomer Duncan Lunan, it revealed its origin as Epsilon Boötes (or the star system as it was 13,000 years ago).

In "Disneyland of the Gods", by John Keel, he reports in depth on this satellite:

"In February 1960 the US detected an unknown object in polar orbit, a feat that neither they or the USSR had been able to accomplish. As if that wasn't enough, it apparently was several sizes larger than anything either country would have been able to get off the ground.

And then, the oddness began. HAM operators began to receive strange coded messages. One person in particular said he managed to decode one of the transmissions, and it corresponded to a star chart. A star chart which would have been plotted from earth 13,000 years ago, and focused on the Epsilon Bostes star system.

On September 3, 1960, seven months after the satellite was first detected by radar, a tracking camera at Grumman Aircraft Corporation's Long Island factory took a photograph of it. People on the ground had been occasionally seeing it for about two weeks at that point. Viewers would make it out as a red glowing object moving in an east-to-west orbit. Most satellites of the time, according to what little material I've been able to find on the black knight satellite, moved from west-to-east. It's speed was also about three times normal. A committee was formed to examine it, but nothing more was ever made public.

Three years later, Gordon Cooper was launched into space for a 22 orbit mission. On his final orbit, he reported seeing a glowing green shape ahead of his capsule, and heading in his direction. It's said that the Muchea tracking station, in Australia, which Cooper reported this too was also able to pick it up on radar traveling in an east-to-west orbit. This event was reported by NBC, but reporters were forbidden to ask Cooper about the event on his landing. The official explanation is that an electrical malfunction in the capsule had caused high levels of carbon dioxide, which induced hallucinations.[1]"

Now, I [webmaster] haven't been able to find reports on this satellite from any news source, but given the recently discovered photos from Russian satellite footage and the stories regarding unknown objects that the early US astronauts saw, I'm inclined to believe this satellite existed. However, the question is its origin- was it a secret US military project, an artifact from earlier in history, or extraterrestrial? The evidence is insufficient to determine the answer.

https://forbiddenhistory.info/?q=node/57

nowaysj wrote:There is a reason Boston dynamics designs their bots like pack animals, and it is not aesthetics.

Nevalo wrote:everytime i open this thread, i think
it would be rather cool,
if there were aliens amongst us.

southstar wrote:

Nevalo wrote:everytime i open this thread, i think
it would be rather cool,
if there were aliens amongst us.

You not seen that documentary Danny Dyer did?

jugo wrote:badly photoshopped pictures and fake video do not equal alien visitors.

jugo wrote:badly photoshopped pictures and fake video do not equal alien visitors.

...nothing is so easy to ignore as something that does not yield freely to understanding.

Giorgio de Santillana

alphacat wrote:George Clinton has the Mothership parked just around the corner from Mars.

But seriously: if any of you (cough JUGO) are experts in photoshoppery, have a look at this and tell me how photoshopped pics wound up on NASA's site amongst regular expedition pics?

And if you're not an expert and can't cite one, then...

Here's something else to chew on: I also read a lot of hard science - like whitepapers and whatnot, as well as rationalist blogs and the like - and nobody can effectively debunk the Black Knight directly. They all just say "it can't be what they think it is" and then make fun of the credulity of the people bringing this stuff up, but never offer ANY kind of alternative explanation let alone clearly debunking it (i.e. "Hi, I'm an Air Force general, and I know what that is. It's a _____.")

alphacat wrote:But seriously: if any of you (cough JUGO) are experts in photoshoppery, have a look at this and tell me how photoshopped pics wound up on NASA's site amongst regular expedition pics?