Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
Jizz
Posts: 3470
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
Location: London

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Jizz » Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:39 am

the problem quite simply is that people worry too much about this. Its all just music m8, listen to what you like and move on

nousd
Posts: 8654
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:22 am
Location: approaching the flux pavillion

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by nousd » Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:59 am

imo
IF the kids are dancing so creatively to bro (I've only experienced the rabid moshing),
how much more creatively will they dance when they come to feel the weighty subtleties of dubstep/garage.
{*}

User avatar
Figment
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Figment » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:08 am

Sonika wrote:I really like old school Rusko (which I think is what people pinpoint as the beginning of this brostep fad) and I think the direction he was taking was exciting, it's super fun and dance-y and lighthearted.

I'm not sure where it went wrong, but somewhere along that line someone started trying to just make the most maximalist screechy crap they could and it didn't have to be that way, but it was

Could really care less though. Only thing is I hesitate to say I like dubstep when I'm talking to people I don't really know. But it's not as bad as I thought, I'm actually astounded at how many people I meet my age who really know a thing or two about its roots. If we're talking about music and I say I like the deeper more "old school" roots of dubstep, I'm constantly surprised at the fact that the person/people I'm talking to will throw out a couple names that I wouldn't have expected them to know of.


who doesn't like old school rusko? :h:
incnic wrote:eat bass u r a wanker m8 lol
fuk off with ur shite prolems cos im trying to classofy dungeon vs classic dubstep ffs
Giving away some remixes:
Soundcloud

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by test_recordings » Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:33 am

JizzMan wrote:the problem quite simply is that people worry too much about this. Its all just music m8, listen to what you like and move on
I agree, but when bullshit impinges on me I'm inclined to make efforts to stop it
Getzatrhythm

User avatar
Marcus
Posts: 2779
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:05 am
Location: London

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Marcus » Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:19 am

Why do you have to justify yourself, everyone has different taste.
Some better than others.
Etches828 wrote:assuming that 130 is a tempo not a sound, which is the point, think it's pretty good when stuff is just described by tempo opposed to some made up name

grillis
Posts: 2976
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:04 am
Location: syd

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by grillis » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:39 am

sd5 wrote:imo
IF the kids are dancing so creatively to bro (I've only experienced the rabid moshing),
how much more creatively will they dance when they come to feel the weighty subtleties of dubstep/garage.
i can answer that


User avatar
antipode
Posts: 4922
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:26 am

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by antipode » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:00 am

oh joe lol
jrkhnds wrote:
and I've never really rated dubstep..
- dubstepforum, 2014.

nousd
Posts: 8654
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:22 am
Location: approaching the flux pavillion

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by nousd » Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:19 am

grillis wrote:
sd5 wrote:imo
IF the kids are dancing so creatively to bro (I've only experienced the rabid moshing),
how much more creatively will they dance when they come to feel the weighty subtleties of dubstep/garage.
i can answer that

tee hee
could do with a few more moves (and clothes)


jeez yu haven't lost weight & dyed yur hair have yu?
{*}

User avatar
fitz
Posts: 494
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Co. Kerry, Republic of 32
Contact:

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by fitz » Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:21 pm

I remember him defending Skream (and Benga as well, IIRC) for playing awful brostep nonsense at a DMZ birthday party, despite the fact the 99% of sane people slated Skream for it. Muggs is a clown.

User avatar
Harkat
Posts: 6375
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:05 am
Location: GLASGOW

Re: Ban this filth! Joe Muggs defends dubstep's dirty side

Post by Harkat » Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:33 pm

I fucking hate the insinuation that proper dubstep is some sort of clever art coffee-table electronica thing. It's rave music.
RKM wrote: when bae hands u the aux mixtape and your squad blunted 9/11 aye lmao

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests