Dubstepforum.com

for people to listen to them? duh

it's deeper than that. humans crave views.

Or maybe people want to hear a song they really love without fast forwarding to exactly 01:41:16 in a mix and then having to rewind it if they want to replay it?

And then once they've cut the song from the mix, why not put it up on Youtube so others can hear it too? Not everyone's scheming

cue le excuses.

no reason to not wait a week and help the sound rather than hinder it for views, and stop playing blind and pretending that's not the reason these guys do it. smh.

TopManLurka wrote:cue le excuses.

no reason to not wait a week and help the sound rather than hinder it for views, and stop playing blind and pretending that's not the reason these guys do it. smh.

you know i do it for that youtube cash.

Final Boss wrote:Or maybe people want to hear a song they really love without fast forwarding to exactly 01:41:16 in a mix and then having to rewind it if they want to replay it?

And then once they've cut the song from the mix, why not put it up on Youtube so others can hear it too? Not everyone's scheming

from when the main point of this thread is about someone asking for bookings from merely ripping tunes, don't play devils advocate and say they do it for other reasons bar themselves. i swear some of you guys are so quick to jump on my posts that you don't even know what you're saying. big up guys hindering the sound for themselves.

notice they're the youngers.

they aint got no restecpa

I'm all for mysterious dub exclusivity, but when you end your BBC show on a full, uninterrupted play of your dubplate, you do it because you're fine with people ripping and sharing it. Or you're an idiot, which I refuse to believe Mala is.

Harkat wrote:

Final Boss wrote:Or maybe people want to hear a song they really love without fast forwarding to exactly 01:41:16 in a mix and then having to rewind it if they want to replay it?

And then once they've cut the song from the mix, why not put it up on Youtube so others can hear it too? Not everyone's scheming

that's exactly why i made my channel.

i do agree that people getting gigs from uploading tunes is absurd though

or you believe that so you can feel happy about doing what you do, innit

then ppl wanna complain on here when 'x' isn't on radio. joke ting.

orangeluva56 wrote: you know i do it for that youtube cash.

but you're making no p though

TopManLurka wrote:then ppl wanna complain on here when 'x' isn't on radio. joke ting.

Come on now. I'd totally understand the essential mix having no Anti-War Dub VIP, no Way Mi Defend remix, and no Changes remix, precisely because people WILL rip them if they are there. If the producers wanna keep the dubs exclusive, so be it. You lot are talking like cutting from a radio show is the same as nicking dubplates from the record bag.

As far as getting booked for these obvious uploads, that's on stupid promoters, not the uploaders.

TopManLurka wrote:

orangeluva56 wrote: you know i do it for that youtube cash.

but you're making no p though

"p"?

forgive me for not knowing what that is. but you really got me on that screenshot though. i am truly a menace to the sound. why share music when im obviously doing it for my own benefit?

Harkat wrote:I'm all for mysterious dub exclusivity, but when you end your BBC show on a full, uninterrupted play of your dubplate, you do it because you're fine with people ripping and sharing it. Or you're an idiot, which I refuse to believe Mala is.

PAL, at least attempt to read the thread before jumping on the hate bandwagon.

Be-1ne wrote:

Phigure wrote:

TopManLurka wrote:srs though, what a joke ting. swear the changes remix was one of those dubs that people actually reached dances to hear as well. feel too that mala ended on that one as a way of concluding the EM rather than just getting it out there on the net. c*nts couldn't even wait a week.

i absolutely agree

Harkat wrote:

TopManLurka wrote:then ppl wanna complain on here when 'x' isn't on radio. joke ting.

Come on now. I'd totally understand the essential mix having no Anti-War Dub VIP, no Way Mi Defend remix, and no Changes remix, precisely because people WILL rip them if they are there. If the producers wanna keep the dubs exclusive, so be it. You lot are talking like cutting from a radio show is the same as nicking dubplates from the record bag.

As far as getting booked for these obvious uploads, that's on stupid promoters, not the uploaders.

*sigh* of course they're gonna be upped ffs. it's more the fact that these guys couldn't wait a week. no worries doe, more views for these youtube seekers, and less listening figures on the bbc means that we'll only have to wait another few years for an essential mix in this sound.

and i dunno who listens to rips of tunes rather than an essential mix, that's disrespect to mala in itself. im still bumping daft punk's mix from 97 and shys from 2005. come correct please.

orangeluva56 wrote: forgive me for not knowing what that is. but you really got me on that screenshot though. i am truly a menace to the sound. why share music when im obviously doing it for my own benefit?

cant take anything you say srs. all i see is, HD dubplatez!!!

cut ur hd dubplatez @ transition. 720p on acetate.

Alright man. I agree with going to the BBC website so we can get more essential mixes from actual good DJs. I also agree listening to the full mix is better, for a slew of reasons, like getting introduced to new music, appreciating the work of the DJ you have to thank for your mixcut, etc. I guess I just think uploads so unavoidable that one can't blame anyone specific for it. It's like drug dealing or something. Someone's gonna do it.

Harkat wrote: It's like drug dealing or something. Someone's gonna do it.

wut

Nevalo wrote:

Harkat wrote: It's like drug dealing or something. Someone's gonna do it.

wut

demand causes supply m8