Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:01 am
by showguns
those first 3 albums simultaneouosly boomed and doomed hiphop depending on who you speka to, the man has a pretty keen ear.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:45 am
by tha_illsta
Quietmouse wrote:has he ever produced anything good
ONE OF THE BEST PRODUCERS THERE IS
IN MY HUMBLE OPINION.
PERHAPS
YOU AIN'T FEELING THE ARTISTS ON OCCASION,
BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN HE AIN'T TALENTED.
HE IS DOUBTLESS ONE OF THE BEST
PRODUCERS OUT THERE.
AND WHO ELSE HAS A BISON IN THEIR STUDIO!!!!
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:47 am
by tha_illsta
HOW ABOUT RUN-DMC AND JOHNNY CASH, FOR STARTERS????
SUPERB.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:23 pm
by fushimi
I was unsure till I saw Mel C on the list. Now I'm convinced.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:02 pm
by *grand*
articles pretty intresting, if anyone has anythng that may seem intresting pls post it
knowledge is power.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:09 pm
by seckle
THA ILLSTA wrote:
AND WHO ELSE HAS A BISON IN THEIR STUDIO!!!!
haha!~
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:21 pm
by tha_illsta
seckle wrote:THA ILLSTA wrote:
AND WHO ELSE HAS A BISON IN THEIR STUDIO!!!!
haha!~
Don't tell me
you have one as well!!!!!
I WANT ONE!!!

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:44 pm
by parson
i respect rubin's ear and all but i heard his version of producing a tune is letting somebody else do it and then saying yeah or nah
is that true?
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:48 pm
by rickyricardo
Parson wrote:i respect rubin's ear and all but i heard his version of producing a tune is letting somebody else do it and then saying yeah or nah
is that true?
In the article he says that he doesn't fiddle w/ buttons at all, and doesn't really know his way around a sound board.
That's what you have engineers for!

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:05 pm
by seckle
these are interesting:
linkin park and rick rubin. working with 6 different pro tools setups.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StfG9ziY_Bk
jayz and rick rubin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hh003Czlx3g
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:28 am
by tacospheros
unklefesta wrote:
10,000,000 slayer fans will agree that rubin is trash
i dunno mang, he produced South of Heaven
and Seasons in the Abyss??? those 2 alone
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:26 am
by parson
i want rick rubin's job
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:45 pm
by step correct

"Andrew Dice Clay"......lol
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:20 am
by FSTZ
Parson wrote:i respect rubin's ear and all but i heard his version of producing a tune is letting somebody else do it and then saying yeah or nah
is that true?
when I went to recording arts school... (in 1991)
"letting somebody else do it and then saying yeah or nah"
was the definition of producer
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:20 pm
by seckle
i think the most important part of a producer's job is their ears. it's invaluable to have someone with enough musical knowledge, to just be there to listen.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:12 pm
by slow bicycle
unklefesta wrote:
when I went to recording arts school... (in 1991)
"letting somebody else do it and then saying yeah or nah"
was the definition of producer
It still is, according to my Recording Engineering prof. A producers job can be as involved or detached as the individual producer. Some of them just put up the money, some of them write all the songs. People like Dre and Timbaland blur the line, but even they have teams of engineers working under them.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:00 pm
by dj 3man
"Reign in Blood" best metal album of all time..... He's good in my books.
Public Enemy.....they got me started way back when to actually go out and start buying hip hop music in 6th grade.
If it wasn't for this guy, where would I be? The shit wouldn't be the same if it wasn't for him. We all might be listening to something else, and would not have had many of the masterpiece albums he has put out.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:14 pm
by two oh one
Yeah, being a 'producer' doesn't mean anybody sat in their bedroom on whatever computer sequencer is one. It means you are employed to sit on a cosy couch at the back of the mixing room and relay your 'vision' to the mix engineer(s) as well as managing the project. You might occasionally wander up to the mix board and fuck things over from time to time.
Yep, there are those who blur the line, but I think you'd have to at least put out an album or two for a band (client) where you didn't push a single button or play an instrument/sing before you can lay claim to being a producer proper.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:55 am
by geiom
For sure you don't have to get technical as a producer when we are talking about folk like Rick Rubin.
It can be really important to have someone there who is not too involved in the 'nuts and bolts' and can give some perspective.
But it always amazes me that sometimes 1 person in a room with maybe just a laptop can produce music that is better than some of the big budget artists with a whole army of studio boffins/producers etc.
having said that if I ever get rich I will be on the phone to someone like Quincy Jones in a flash !
The credits on big projects crack me up sometimes - the new Bjork album says on one track -
'Timbaland - triggering pre-recorded percussion loop'
- Just the one loop ? and does that mean he didn't even create the loop ? maybe they e-mailed it to him and then sat him at a keyboard?
and then they have to credit Jimmy Douglas for 'engineering the session' (pretty much just pressing record in this case i suspect)
I got a lot of respect for Timbaland but he does seem to have lost the plot over the years....
btw the Bjork album is amazing - if you like Bjork. Also the vinyl comes in some ridiculous but excellent packaging.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:32 pm
by thesynthesist
There are two words that invalidate this conversation, not to mention Rick Rubin's assumed "claim" of bringing Hip Hop to the mainstream....
Bill....
Laswell....
Suck on that Rolling Stone!!