Licence to stomp

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by wub » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:27 am

southstar wrote:I would willingly pay a larger fee for a license that meant no adverts on any channel
That would cost a fucking fortune :lol:

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:33 am

wub wrote:
southstar wrote:I would willingly pay a larger fee for a license that meant no adverts on any channel
That would cost a fucking fortune :lol:
Jonathan Woss and Simon Cowl could fund it all.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Forum » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:35 am

At least ban Halifax and mcdonalds from making any more adverts and I'll be happy
Image Image

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:37 am

magma wrote:Morons.
:roll: Insults not needed for people with different opinions Mag, you know this.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by garethom » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:40 am

I can not, in all good faith, willingly support an agency that so often employs Caroline Quentin.

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Forum » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:41 am

And not forgetting that Vauxhall advert with the fucking awful reasons to be cheerful "rap"
Image Image

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:41 am

garethom wrote:I can not, in all good faith, willingly support an agency that so often employs Caroline Quentin.
or...
Kept quiet about a peado ring that was on their books.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by garethom » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:43 am

Comes 2nd to Caroline Quentin tbf.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:44 am

garethom wrote:Comes 2nd to Caroline Quentin tbf.
I see your Caroline Quentin and raise you Dawn French.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
Johnlenham
Posts: 6067
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:08 pm
Location: London

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Johnlenham » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:48 am

Riddles wrote:
magma wrote:The TV License is one of the best things Britain ever introduced. Pop over to America for a week, watch some telly and then come back and tell me the BBC isn't worth 40p/day.

The most basic Sky subscription is 70p/day and you still have to sit through adverts to pay for it.

Morons.
Yeah, I'm all for the TV License, fuck a 20 minute TV program having 10 mins of adverts. They put out some good TV too, not all my cup of tea but that's the point surely
Sky is fucking horrendous. My family at home have it and everytime I go over I swear I watch more adverts than actual TV. You basically need Sky+ in order to not have to sit through it all.

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Forum » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:50 am

Unfortunately as long as they have the football rights i'll have to continue paying the £70 a month
Last edited by Forum on Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image Image

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:52 am

Johnlenham wrote:
Riddles wrote:
magma wrote:The TV License is one of the best things Britain ever introduced. Pop over to America for a week, watch some telly and then come back and tell me the BBC isn't worth 40p/day.

The most basic Sky subscription is 70p/day and you still have to sit through adverts to pay for it.

Morons.
Yeah, I'm all for the TV License, fuck a 20 minute TV program having 10 mins of adverts. They put out some good TV too, not all my cup of tea but that's the point surely
Sky is fucking horrendous. My family at home have it and everytime I go over I swear I watch more adverts than actual TV. You basically need Sky+ in order to not have to sit through it all.
Apart from the imported US shows it may as well just be SPORTSTVADVERTTVSPORTSLATERAFTERADVERTSTHENSPORTS waste of money.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by garethom » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:53 am

But guys, adverts allow us to learn of new tv shows and scheduling and products that we may potentially buy.

In all seriousness though, I can't knock them too much, they are paying for the TV show I'm watching.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:57 am

Them fucking betting adverts with Ray Winston though :a:
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by magma » Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:04 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:
magma wrote:Morons.
:roll: Insults not needed for people with different opinions Mag, you know this.
Oh, come on... do you really think skipping the License payment is a political statement as you've tried to argue above or are you reaching to try and find anything to justify getting free entertainment?
When the BBC start broadcasting the UK news instead of government rhetoric and they stop wasting money on management costs and bad programming, I may consider paying for the services I use provided by them but until that point they can go fuckaduck.
I'm going to try not to insult you, but this really is the biggest crock of shit in the entire thread. The Beeb piss off the government just as much as they "spread rhetoric". Have you never seen an episode of Newsnight, Question Time or the Daily Politics?

The amusing thing about the BBC is that it's hated by tight people from all walks of life. Conservative misers say it's a lefty paradise promoting socialism and liberalism; Progressives, Liberal and Lefty cheapskates say it's part of the establishment and acts against progression.

All of them say 40p/day is too expensive for 9 National TV channels filled with original content, 15 National radio stations and god knows how many local services. The eye-roll on offer within this smiley isn't nearly big enough. :roll:
Last edited by magma on Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

parkour_nico
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:55 am
Location: Novocastria

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by parkour_nico » Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:05 pm

BBC is nothing short of a joke nowadays, i really struggle to see how paying a licence is justified? seemingly its just re-runs and repeats of programmes made years ago, and their new material is just fucking atrocious 'comedy' see mrs browns boys and citizen khan. coupled with the aforementioned paedophile ring cover up it's difficult to see how any confidence remains for the corporation.. the ostensible refusal to cover real MASSIVE news stories like the million mask march is also a worry
particle-jim wrote:i know a brilliant 'knock knock' joke, but you have to start it

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by garethom » Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:09 pm

u guys

Image

Never forget.

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by Forum » Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:09 pm

Don't really see the problem with her tbh...
Image Image

User avatar
m8son666
moist
Posts: 6580
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: MODERATOR
Contact:

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by m8son666 » Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:10 pm

i dont even recognise her what does she do?
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.

benjam
Posts: 1063
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: Manc

Re: TV Licensing and the law (UK)

Post by benjam » Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:11 pm

southstar wrote:Don't really see the problem with her tbh...
Ruined jonathan creek?

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests