Dubstepforum.com

Harkat wrote:that surprises me coming from jess "rape" lem

What happens in deleted threads stays there imo.

54

I just retook mine and got 64

66. Although that's kinda a mishmash of my true personality and my work personality. I recognise that sometimes there are just easier ways to get things done at work. Not that it should ever be necessary to lie, but a judicious/selective choice of words can be helpful.

You at work and you outside of it are the same person, the two-facedness is very Machiavellian.

51

55

60 rite on the median
dudes with 80 + are going to be poor IMO if thy r in a posistion of an employer

i dont think those particular questions are very good for determining this

but i got a 55

anyone take the follow up test about the cross sections of 3d objects? that was more interesting but they didnt show any results

65, right on top of the bell curve.

Human as fuck.

hi-5

Phigure wrote:anyone take the follow up test about the cross sections of 3d objects? that was more interesting but they didnt show any results

I'm pretty sure I used to be able to do stuff like that. I've had a bash at two tests like that this week and just stared blankly at them. 31 years old and getting thicker. I've peaked!

49, seems reasonable

I got 48, that cross section one following it though I use to excel at 3d technical drawing but it appears that's gone to shit.

yea that 3d shit was weird

50.

I thought the 3d stuff was easy and was pretty confident. Which means I probably got them all wrong.

i got 78, surprised anyone got much higher

big ups boys

surprised you werent higher lol

yeah i felt a bit evil putting some of them

the people who got below 60 are just lying to themselves

like you just are, there is no argument for that you naive fannies lol

Phigure wrote:anyone take the follow up test about the cross sections of 3d objects? that was more interesting but they didnt show any results

I'm convinced some of the answers weren't quite right or they'd drawn the cuts slightly off.