Dubstepforum.com

I've been hearing from international groups that you all need to be eliminated because you pose health risks to the world's ecosystem. I can't disagree. Bye.

Saturated fat isn't the problem, sugar is. Every time fat is analysed critically the scientists say it's not a problem, the original 'fat is bad' hypothesis was just that - a hypothesis, just a question to check the answer to, not. the. fucking. answer.

http://www.gnolls.org/1086/the-lipid-hy ... 1-of-many/

I eat a shit load of fat and I'm healthy. However, I rarely go anywhere near anything fried in mono-unsaturated oil, that's what causes your blood vessels to fuck up because the unsaturated parts oxidise easily when heated. Saturated fats aren't damaged anywhere near as much by heat so they're cool...

Health test every year. If your results class you as overweight, you get put in a higher tax bracket for the next year. Well see how many of these fatties really have glandular issues when their income is affected.

wub wrote:Health test every year. If your results class you as overweight, you get put in a higher tax bracket for the next year. Well see how many of these fatties really have glandular issues when their income is affected.

to me this would just result in political battles on what is overweight

Burn me.

ehbrums1 wrote:

wub wrote:Health test every year. If your results class you as overweight, you get put in a higher tax bracket for the next year. Well see how many of these fatties really have glandular issues when their income is affected.

to me this would just result in political battles on what is overweight

Getting your fat privilege mumbo jumbo in early I see.

obligatory fat camp imo

wub wrote:

ehbrums1 wrote:

wub wrote:Health test every year. If your results class you as overweight, you get put in a higher tax bracket for the next year. Well see how many of these fatties really have glandular issues when their income is affected.

to me this would just result in political battles on what is overweight

Getting your fat privilege mumbo jumbo in early I see.

This reminds me, fat people are now talking about 'thin privilege' as if it is a thing. I am privileged because when I was sick of being fat at 15, I decided to eat less.

Thin privilege aka "How dare you be prejudice against me because of my shitty life choices, lack of willpower and cake retention!"

Don't give a shit if a person is or isn't fat or if they want to be that way. Shitty life choices are just that.. a life choice, let them do what they want. Its if they have kids who they basically just feed mc donalds all day every day, then I think people should be legally allowed to punch them in the face.

people eat, drink and smoke themselves to death like fucking idiots, they should be stopped

We've been here before.

wub wrote:Thin privilege aka "How dare you be prejudice against me because of my shitty life choices, lack of willpower and cake retention!"

I'm quite alright with people choosing a lifestyle that makes them fat, but I'm reading articles where fat people complain that fat kids should have 'fat role models in Disney movies' and then I'm thinking; why should Disney be forced to endorse a dangerous lifestyle that kids will suffer from? Should we also have Disney characters that shoot heroin and get into bareback gangbangs with strangers every night?

Do whatever you want with your body, but don't try to push your unhealthy lifestyle to children so you can feel good about yourself.

nobody wrote:people eat, drink and smoke themselves to death like fucking idiots, they should be stopped

It's their bodies.

Genevieve wrote:

nitz wrote:

Genevieve wrote:Particular food items or types of food do not cause obesity.

And what do you base this one? Food makes people fat, not the lack of food per se.

Simple maths.

Say you use 2000 calories per day, and eat 2500 calories worth of fruit, nuts, free range meat, organic vegetables, etc.

Those 500 calories will be stored on the body as tissue. Depending on macronutritional ratios of your diet and your lifestyle (sedative vs resistance training vs cardiovascular training), these calories can be stored as either mostly muscle, mostly fat, or both in roughly equal amounts. Either way, you will gain weight.

But if you use up 2000 calories per day and you consume 2000 calories worth of junkfood per day, you won't gain or lose weight, you'll stay the same.

Strongly disagree with that - any means of counting calories is flawed. The whole calorie system is flawed. You can eat 3000 calories a day and still with a healthy lifestyle you will not gain weight, but if it's the right food you'll lose wiehgt. Yes, certain foods increase your metabolic rate and make you poo what is stored and thus in turn losing weight.

Say person 1 date a 2500k pizza, person 2 ate 2500k of fruit veg and some meat. The second person abeit having eaten the same amount of calories will maintain his weight, whereas person b will 99.9% gain weight.

Food makes people fat, and the calories in food.

Did anything see that guy who ate mcd's for 1 month and lost shit loads of weigh because of what he choose to eat? Obvs not the best study, but semin proves the point.


@test recording. Yes saturated fat is not unhealthy (myth) in most cases, sugar is the real devil - refiled sugar that it, gland people know this! Coucnut oil and ghee heat rate is ilke 300c - put any in any form of causing and it will remain in tack. Our shitty mono like vegetable oil and boom like a bomb. P.s i never understand why best chefs use olive oil for cooking, do they not that its only for dressing, oliver oil starts to breakdown below 100c

Genevieve wrote:Do whatever you want with your body, but don't try to push your unhealthy lifestyle to children so you can feel good about yourself.

This. Don't give shit what people do to themselves as long as it doesn't effect other people.

nitz wrote:Strongly disagree with that - any means of counting calories is flawed. The whole calorie system is flawed. You can eat 3000 calories a day and still with a healthy lifestyle you will not gain weight, but if it's the right food you'll lose wiehgt. Yes, certain foods increase your metabolic rate and make you poo what is stored and thus in turn losing weight.

Say person 1 date a 2500k pizza, person 2 ate 2500k of fruit veg and some meat. The second person abeit having eaten the same amount of calories will maintain his weight, whereas person b will 99.9% gain weight.

No, because calories are a measure of energy. People use up energy through-out the day and excess energy is stored on your body as tissue to be used later. Restricted the amount of energy you consume then makes your body tap into its reserves (fat, muscle) and you lose weight. You didn't debunk anything I said, you just repeated your innitial point with more words.

100 Watts of energy is still 100 watts of energy, regardless of whether it is generated by wind or coal.

nitz wrote:Did anything see that guy who ate mcd's for 1 month and lost shit loads of weigh because of what he choose to eat? Obvs not the best study, but semin proves the point.

No, it proves my point because he restricted his caloric intake to a little over 2000 calories while still eating junkfood.

I restricted my calories to 2000 calories last summer, I lost weight eating cheeseburgers.

fat models, black models, black dolls, gay game characters. let people make whatever they want to make. like maybe i don't want to make clothes for fat people. sick of these annoying high horse prancing civil rights fetishists

Genevieve wrote:

nitz wrote:Strongly disagree with that - any means of counting calories is flawed. The whole calorie system is flawed. You can eat 3000 calories a day and still with a healthy lifestyle you will not gain weight, but if it's the right food you'll lose wiehgt. Yes, certain foods increase your metabolic rate and make you poo what is stored and thus in turn losing weight.

Say person 1 date a 2500k pizza, person 2 ate 2500k of fruit veg and some meat. The second person abeit having eaten the same amount of calories will maintain his weight, whereas person b will 99.9% gain weight.

No, because calories are a measure of energy. People use up energy through-out the day and excess energy is stored on your body as tissue to be used later. Restricted the amount of energy you consume then makes your body tap into its reserves (fat, muscle) and you lose weight. You didn't debunk anything I said, you just repeated your innitial point with more words.

100 Watts of energy is still 100 watts of energy, regardless of whether it is generated by wind or coal.

nitz wrote:Did anything see that guy who ate mcd's for 1 month and lost shit loads of weigh because of what he choose to eat? Obvs not the best study, but semin proves the point.

No, it proves my point because he restricted his caloric intake to a little over 2000 calories while still eating junkfood.

I restricted my calories to 2000 calories last summer, I lost weight eating cheeseburgers.

Ok so, what you're saying is 2000 calories of cheeseburgers, breakfast lunch and dinner is all the same as 2000 calories of fruit veg and meat? Is this what your converting?

In regards to mcd's you're missing the point. Yes he ate 2000 calories, but it was what he ate

" He also balanced the intake of nutrients based on the FDA's reference daily intake tables by combining different items from the fast food chain's menu"

"The second difference is that Cisca started to walk 45 minutes a day, like any normal human being should do."

I have no idea what your point out too tbh

Edit - i think i got it, you saying calorie in, calorie out?

the amount of shit I get from adults for not giving my infants sugary sweets is ludicrous. they dont understand why and think its us slating them.

Im a fully grown man whose taken most stimulants and downers on the market, but you give me a bag of haribo and a glass of coke, even when Im blunted and Im gonna be babbling like a whizz 'ed.

some adults really do mean well, but when it comes to dietary needs there idiots. Ive actually heard this " my child wont eat her tea she just wants chocolate"
she's 2!! she doesnt shop or prepare the food, you give it to her.

idiots!

so yeh regulate it. the unhealthy stuff that is. to children anyway. no pictures please tho I dont wana see someones gammy leg on my lamb.

I don't think food regulation will stop bad parenting.