What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
:/
Anal A$ap....Keep living dat #PLUR life....To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea.... Swagm8son wrote:yh a bit of extra knob fiddling is ok
Instagram Soundcloud
- syrup
- Reigning Mini-Mix King
- Posts: 8351
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm
- Location: down in my heart
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Goat stare,
i mean, how can you not
i mean, how can you not
dubfordessert wrote:you can jizz on me if you want
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
I listen everything from "og" dubstep/dnb to tearout dubstep/jumpup dnb/house/hiphop/rock/metal/hardstyle/trance/glitch (hop)/movie soundtracks/ambient/million different fusion/sub genres like electronic rock, minimal house etc. etc. I don't hate anything in today's dubstep, edm trap and bigroom house are for that.
Ofc it doesn't sound that amazing when somebody with less experience/skill tries to make exact copy of something. I don't like hearing an copy of a Skrillex track (nobody hasn't really even nailed it yet), but neither I like hearing somebody put together bunch of real life samples in random order to get a some sort of Burial-esque sound.
Ofc it doesn't sound that amazing when somebody with less experience/skill tries to make exact copy of something. I don't like hearing an copy of a Skrillex track (nobody hasn't really even nailed it yet), but neither I like hearing somebody put together bunch of real life samples in random order to get a some sort of Burial-esque sound.
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Burial puts samples in random order to create his sound?
Would say that about Skrillex tbh, but I guess his technique is so refined nobody knows how to recreate it as you claim
Would say that about Skrillex tbh, but I guess his technique is so refined nobody knows how to recreate it as you claim
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
so you don't have any kind of taste? instead you suck it all in, everything, all the time._Agu_ wrote:I listen everything from "og" dubstep/dnb to tearout dubstep/jumpup dnb/house/hiphop/rock/metal/hardstyle/trance/glitch (hop)/movie soundtracks/ambient/million different fusion/sub genres like electronic rock, minimal house etc. etc. I don't hate anything in today's dubstep, edm trap and bigroom house are for that.
Ofc it doesn't sound that amazing when somebody with less experience/skill tries to make exact copy of something. I don't like hearing an copy of a Skrillex track (nobody hasn't really even nailed it yet), but neither I like hearing somebody put together bunch of real life samples in random order to get a some sort of Burial-esque sound.
SoundcloudAxeD wrote:I dunno, there's some thoroughly unemployed people on this forum.
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Seemed like Agu was more open minded to me.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
_Agu_ wrote:I listen everything from "og" dubstep/dnb to tearout dubstep/jumpup dnb/house/hiphop/rock/metal/hardstyle/trance/glitch (hop)/movie soundtracks/ambient/million different fusion/sub genres like electronic rock, minimal house etc. etc. I don't hate anything in today's dubstep, edm trap and bigroom house are for that.
Ofc it doesn't sound that amazing when somebody with less experience/skill tries to make exact copy of something. I don't like hearing an copy of a Skrillex track (nobody hasn't really even nailed it yet), but neither I like hearing somebody put together bunch of real life samples in random order to get a some sort of Burial-esque sound.
om_unit wrote: wtf is juke?
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
nobody wrote:_Agu_ wrote: but neither I like hearing somebody put together bunch of real life samples in random order to get a some sort of Burial-esque sound.


Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
No Burial doesn't put samples in random order to create tunes. It's some of the people who try to copy his sound. Also if you really have listened any Skrillex tune without quitting after 10 seconds, you may notice he doesn't either. Oh hell yes people know how to make growls but it doesn't make them sound Skrillex, same way that layering sliced jungle breaks, vinyl drum hits and 808s etc. don't make you automatically sound like any particular og dubstep artist.RADD wrote:Burial puts samples in random order to create his sound?
Would say that about Skrillex tbh, but I guess his technique is so refined nobody knows how to recreate it as you claim
jrkhnds wrote:so you don't have any kind of taste? instead you suck it all in, everything, all the time.
These are just a few, there's a lot more, but it's not relevant._Agu_ wrote:I don't hate anything in today's dubstep, edm trap and bigroom house are for that.
It just seems stupid to me how people say that every brostep artist is a piece of shit wannabe Skrillex. How does using sine wave sub bass (which is already used 9999999999 times by someone) in every one of your tracks differ from that? What about amen break?
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Using sine wave sub bass =/= copying skrillex tbh
Anal A$ap....Keep living dat #PLUR life....To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea.... Swagm8son wrote:yh a bit of extra knob fiddling is ok
Instagram Soundcloud
- Ema_geodiV
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:56 am
- Contact:
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Well.. isn't it using sine wave as a sub is the usual?CreamLord wrote:Using sine wave sub bass =/= copying skrillex tbh
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Idk where are we going anymore, but my point was that it's funny how people are selective of when are you copying someone (again using growls/other brosteppish sounds) and when are you not (sine subs, breaks, 808s, all different charasterics of underground dubstep).Ema_geodiV wrote:Well.. isn't it using sine wave as a sub is the usual?CreamLord wrote:Using sine wave sub bass =/= copying skrillex tbh
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
i can only assume you're trolling with this ridiculous comment_Agu_ wrote:it's funny how people are selective of when are you copying someone (again using growls/other brosteppish sounds) and when are you not (sine subs, breaks, 808s, all different charasterics of underground dubstep).
using the 808 is copying someone else, absolute rubbish.
i think i know what i hate about todays dubstep now. it's people like agu who try and defend shitty brostep that all sounds the same because the producers are unimaginative sheep.

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
See that's just it though, the problem Agu is pointing out is that a lot people who don't like that stuff like equally boring music that comes out of the 'deeper' categories within dubstep, as if the fact that it's not got a chainsaw justifies a lack of imagination and excitement in other crucial respect. It doesn't make sense to say you dislike people who sound like skrillex for any reason other than the fact that their music isn't good, can't just say that because it's broey it's shit, so you can't do the opposite and say that something that isn't broey is inherently good.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
its like saying that techno producers who use a 909 just copying jeff mills
theyre not theyre just sticking to certain implied conventions about a genre
but if they used the same patch that mills used in the bells that would be blatant copying
likewise if a dubstep producer makes a 'deep' (stupid term imo but that's another discussion) or uses an 808 he isn't copying everyone that used one before. but a quick glance at the sound design sub forum shows the number of producers desperate to copy the zomboy sound (for example)
theyre not theyre just sticking to certain implied conventions about a genre
but if they used the same patch that mills used in the bells that would be blatant copying
likewise if a dubstep producer makes a 'deep' (stupid term imo but that's another discussion) or uses an 808 he isn't copying everyone that used one before. but a quick glance at the sound design sub forum shows the number of producers desperate to copy the zomboy sound (for example)

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Yeah, exactly, he's trivializing the notion that music that sounds like skrillex's music is bad because it sounds like skrillex's music and not because it's just bad. Even skrillex uses 909s, but that's not the reason we don't listen to his music, is it?
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
- Ema_geodiV
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:56 am
- Contact:
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Dubstep like Zomboy's (sorry for Zomboy fans out there) are one of the example. He sample skrillex way too much and regardless of that...his songs sounds almost the same. Also some of those people (Just some soundcloud users I've encountered before) who makes dubstep/brostep with a lot of nonsense wubs and growls. I'm not a professional or something... but I don't think they're aiming for originality any more. They just want to make those "bad ass" growls and put it in their tracks. But this is only my personal opinion.
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
I think that's partially true, but I think that many people do it in order to out filth each other, which is intentively original imo.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
- Ema_geodiV
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:56 am
- Contact:
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
rickyarbino wrote:I think that's partially true, but I think that many people do it in order to out filth each other, which is intentively original imo.
There is nothing wrong with sampling imo. But the way they emphasize their or somebody else's (famous artist) "growls" and "wubs" is way too much. It's not a song anymore, It's just a track filled with wubs and growls to make something that is "kick-ass".
-
rickyarbino
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: What do you hate about today's dubstep??
Well it only fails to be a song if it doesn't have singing
, but that's not the issue. I think it's clearer to just say it's shit because you don't like it rather than saying it's shit because it sounds like someone who's better than they are. I mean what if they're copying something you actually like? Doesn't necessarily make it shit, perhaps it's less creative, but you can still like it. I definitely like Noyce even though a bunch of his stuff plays on the same things that Shlohmo did on Bad Vibes, his tunes are still good though so I'll allow it. Who knows who Shlohmo was biting when he put that out...
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests