do you want it??thesynthesist wrote:wobble
What really defines dubstep?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- thesynthesist
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:05 pm
- Location: the Right side of Computo's brain...
- Contact:
I think half the definitions given here could apply to plenty of other music, there is very little vibe musically or emotionally connecting Mala and Caspa or Vex'd and Ikonika for instance. If it's space, bass and place (or whatever Mr Nice said), then I've got a D'Cruze jungle tune from 94 that would fit the bill. Or Radio Babylon wouldn't be too far off either.
As someone said earlier, there's little similarity in rhythm programming (although halfstep beats are often tediously formulaic) between the bigger producers.
Even the tempo isn't necessarily that defined - Pinch has done a track at 90bpm and quite a lot of the newer producers don't feel constrained by 140bpm limitations.
I personally feel that most of the people that say music that has that "dubstep sound" really mean halfstep and sub, slightly lurching beat and funkless drums, which to me is the least interesting aspect of the sound.
That Burial quote is spot on by the way
As someone said earlier, there's little similarity in rhythm programming (although halfstep beats are often tediously formulaic) between the bigger producers.
Even the tempo isn't necessarily that defined - Pinch has done a track at 90bpm and quite a lot of the newer producers don't feel constrained by 140bpm limitations.
I personally feel that most of the people that say music that has that "dubstep sound" really mean halfstep and sub, slightly lurching beat and funkless drums, which to me is the least interesting aspect of the sound.
That Burial quote is spot on by the way

Hmm....


For me, its that "half step" drawn out pace that i really vibe off. it allows so much space in the sound ! but hey, if everyone liked dubstep for exactly the same reasons, everyone would be producin' pretty much the same track !I personally feel that most of the people that say music that has that "dubstep sound" really mean halfstep and sub, slightly lurching beat and funkless drums, which to me is the least interesting aspect of the sound.
onelove
-
- Posts: 6830
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:25 pm
- Location: First dsf male lesbian/Savannah, GA
Like the blessed saint Satchmo said to a reporter asking what exactly jazz was: "Man, if you have to ask what it is, you’ll never know.”
It is interesting to sort of pick out what elements most of "the genre" has in common, though. Many of us love de herb, example... just like Satchmo!
Sometimes seeking to define something to a tee with words causes both to lose meaning, in a bad way. Another well-worn maxim says "writing about music is like dancing about architecture"; you cannot use one expressive medium to convey the essence of another expressive medium without assuming that they're about the same thing, which they're usually not.
Honestly, the day anybody just can boil it down to a glib formula is the day I'm on to the next mutation, whatever that may be. Music is music, and descriptive labels come after the fact. Scared of the musician that sits down and says "I'm gonna make THE most spot-on, formulaic, textbook Dubstep tune ever!"
It is interesting to sort of pick out what elements most of "the genre" has in common, though. Many of us love de herb, example... just like Satchmo!
Sometimes seeking to define something to a tee with words causes both to lose meaning, in a bad way. Another well-worn maxim says "writing about music is like dancing about architecture"; you cannot use one expressive medium to convey the essence of another expressive medium without assuming that they're about the same thing, which they're usually not.
Honestly, the day anybody just can boil it down to a glib formula is the day I'm on to the next mutation, whatever that may be. Music is music, and descriptive labels come after the fact. Scared of the musician that sits down and says "I'm gonna make THE most spot-on, formulaic, textbook Dubstep tune ever!"
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
^^this is the best desciption so far.fuagofire wrote:the bastard lovechild of garage/dnb/ragga/dancehall/techno/hiphop and your mum on acid
dubstep is a good platform to present elements of other genres on. for example, i hate house beats, but anti war dub is amazing.
for me, dubstep is like putting every genre and some weed into a big bowl, then smoking a big bowl, and trying to make some hash cakes out of the mixture that is in that bowl.
like someone else said, its not only hard to define, its quite personal. the sooner we start defining it, the sooner we'll have EVEN MORE shitty generic dubstep beats.
is it just me or are there no good dubstep records coming out recently?
- thesynthesist
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:05 pm
- Location: the Right side of Computo's brain...
- Contact:
yeah... everytime i put on a dubstep mix for somebody that has no clue about it, usually says something like.. "yeah this is kinda cool... but every song sounds so different..."£10 Bag wrote:^^this is the best desciption so far.fuagofire wrote:the bastard lovechild of garage/dnb/ragga/dancehall/techno/hiphop and your mum on acid
dubstep is a good platform to present elements of other genres on.
now theres an idea...
personally i think dubstep is like a mash of genres and that it's always evolving so it tends to never really sound the same, just depends on the artits influences, if they've come from an electro rock scene the sound tends to be more egdey and distorted. etc etc.
personally dubstep to me is about having a good dance and vibing out to the subs, and thats all its ever been about for me.
:):):)
personally dubstep to me is about having a good dance and vibing out to the subs, and thats all its ever been about for me.

- gravious
- >>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: The Side of The Clyde
- Contact:
psyphon wrote:Like I said...Hugh wrote: ur the one making stupid fuckin topics
BORE OFF AND FUCKING BORE SOME OTHER THREAD WITH YOUR BORING FUCKING COMMENTS.

@

Sod you all, I'm off to practice my archetectural ballet...

Soundcloud Twitter Facebook
Recent Gravious releases, out now:
12" - Rolling Thunder EP - Halo Cyan
12" - Junction City EP - Saigon Recordings
- thesynthesist
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:05 pm
- Location: the Right side of Computo's brain...
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests