Altern-8 - Frequency (DFRNT Remix) - FREE 320!!

unsigned forum members' tracks & place for feedback
Forum rules
By using this "Dubs" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Production Forum
User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:48 pm

Solshada wrote:Slamming tune!! thanks for this, and also the dead prez hip hop remix which is also fucking MASSIVE!!

Your skillz are top notch :!:
Nice one mate - thanks!

User avatar
sio2
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:49 pm
Location: out and about

Post by sio2 » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:35 pm

:o Luv it. YAH. thank you for sharing !!! :lol:

User avatar
harvest
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: houston, texas

Post by harvest » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:38 am

absolutely sick!

Image
Image

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:05 pm

Sio2 wrote::o Luv it. YAH. thank you for sharing !!! :lol:
Thank YOU for listening! :D

stanton
Posts: 2660
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:32 pm

Post by stanton » Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:53 am

This is one of my favourite Altern-8 tunes and you've done it proud. Cheers to the 320!
Bass Master General

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:15 am

stanton wrote:This is one of my favourite Altern-8 tunes and you've done it proud. Cheers to the 320!
no problem mate - it's my pleasure!

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:42 am

Good effort but not a patch on the orig imo. I cannot find much of a groove and in places there is too much going on.

I will pass this link onto Mark Archer for him to have a listen:)
Last edited by serox on Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:49 am

Serox wrote:Good effort but not a patch on the orig imo. I cannot find much of a groove with the bd and in places there is too much going on.

I will pass this link onto Mark Archer for him to have a listen:)
Nice one. I appreciate your honesty mate. Everything's not for everyone.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:58 am

Alex-C wrote:
Serox wrote:Good effort but not a patch on the orig imo. I cannot find much of a groove with the bd and in places there is too much going on.

I will pass this link onto Mark Archer for him to have a listen:)
Nice one. I appreciate your honesty mate. Everything's not for everyone.
tbh I dont think there is much any1 could do to improve on the orig for me so dont take it bad:)

I have played the orig so many times so hearing anything differernt is hard:)
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:00 am

Serox wrote:
Alex-C wrote:
Serox wrote:Good effort but not a patch on the orig imo. I cannot find much of a groove with the bd and in places there is too much going on.

I will pass this link onto Mark Archer for him to have a listen:)
Nice one. I appreciate your honesty mate. Everything's not for everyone.
tbh I dont think there is much any1 could do to improve on the orig for me so dont take it bad:)

I have played the orig so many times so hearing anything differernt is hard:)
It's cool. No offence taken. I'm the same way with one or two producers. Know exactly what you mean :wink:

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:14 am

Alex-C wrote:
It's cool. No offence taken. I'm the same way with one or two producers. Know exactly what you mean :wink:
I heard one of ur mixes the other day and quite enjoyed it. I like your page too, did you do the html?
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:16 am

Serox wrote:
Alex-C wrote:
It's cool. No offence taken. I'm the same way with one or two producers. Know exactly what you mean :wink:
I heard one of ur mixes the other day and quite enjoyed it. I like your page too, did you do the html?
Yup - all hand-coded, CSS/XHTML.

I'm a full-time web designer by profession, so try and take as much of my knowledge home as poss.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:41 am

Alex-C wrote:
Yup - all hand-coded, CSS/XHTML.

I'm a full-time web designer by profession, so try and take as much of my knowledge home as poss.
Yeh I thought you did. Nice gfx, what u making the glowing logos in?

sorry for hijack:p
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:49 am

Serox wrote:
Alex-C wrote:
Yup - all hand-coded, CSS/XHTML.

I'm a full-time web designer by profession, so try and take as much of my knowledge home as poss.
Yeh I thought you did. Nice gfx, what u making the glowing logos in?

sorry for hijack:p
They're Photoshop - mix of layer styles and effects mostly. I spent alot of time back in Uni learning Photoshop, and although I use Fireworks for most design stuff now (better for web design) I still use Photoshop for some of the nicer illustrative elements, and Illustrator if it's going to be scaled up at all.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:16 am

ill pm my next questions:p
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
mrnex
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:21 am

Post by mrnex » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:31 am

i obviously don't get dubstep at all then - this sounded far weaker than the original version - it sounded like a drum track played over some samples that are way too low in the mix......

Mark Altern 8

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:10 am

mrnex wrote:i obviously don't get dubstep at all then - this sounded far weaker than the original version - it sounded like a drum track played over some samples that are way too low in the mix......

Mark Altern 8
:( - I appreciate you taking the time to check it out. Thank you.

I guess it might be well worth re-visiting, although I'm not sure I can better the original! Me, the lowly bedroom producer having nearly completed his first EP, trying to re-work a classic track from what many consider to be a ledgendary production duo! Maybe I'll just let it go, and concentrate on the original stuff!! :)

User avatar
mrnex
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:21 am

Post by mrnex » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:47 am

Don't get me wrong, i'm all for adding familiarity to a tune by using a slice of a well known track, i mean - thats what we did back then with a few of our tracks, but it just didn't seem to have the power or urgency of the original (which was produced in a bedroom by myself on some very lo-tech gear...)

User avatar
DFRNT
Posts: 1775
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: AKA "Alex-C"
Contact:

Post by DFRNT » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:58 am

mrnex wrote:Don't get me wrong, i'm all for adding familiarity to a tune by using a slice of a well known track, i mean - thats what we did back then with a few of our tracks, but it just didn't seem to have the power or urgency of the original (which was produced in a bedroom by myself on some very lo-tech gear...)
That's cool. I think I got caught up taking the track in a strange direction. Possibly trying to add too much, where it wasn't required.

Couldn't ask for more than feedback from the original artist tho! Thanks again!

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:59 am

I dont have much of a clue about production really but I dj quite a bit so will give my opinion on how it sounds.

Strip some bits out cos it sounds like there is too much going on and nothing stands out as it is. Play around with the drums a bit and try get a better groove going. Try get a build up and then a drop that realy stands out and has a big impact.

Dubstep doesnt really have the same punch as Techno/Breakbeat so this tune may appeal to most Dubstep artists. You are prob just better off doing what you think sounds good imo:)
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests