reducing or boosting!?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:55 pm

Sorry - what are these artefacts you're talking about? How do they manifest themselves?

You suggest that the mathematics depends on your point of view :? , and then say you're talking from a theoretical point of view. Do you get more theoretical than the mathematics?

I'm confused :) I'm pretty sure it is a language thing, and my German is 'scheisse'. :lol:
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

User avatar
jobbanaught
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Hamburg / Germany

Post by jobbanaught » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:48 pm

Maybe its more about my scheiss english :lol:

The theory behind signal processing is mathematics of course (mainly fourier and wavelet transformation). With "depends on your point of view" I meant if you look at it from a theoretical or a practical view.
From the theoretical point boosting in digital is imperfect, but from a practical point of view this might be neglectable. My experience is that the latter depends on the quality of the EQ you use, but that experience might be subjective.

Hope this clarifies...

manray
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:09 am

Post by manray » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:54 pm

OR you could stop worrying about theories of signal processing and artefacts and just make good music.

I highly doubt it matters all that much these days if you use a decent quality EQ whether you are boosting or reducing. I know people are always going on about keeping it simple and less is more but seriously unless you are coldplay you are probably going to be OK.

User avatar
jobbanaught
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Hamburg / Germany

Post by jobbanaught » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:12 pm

manray wrote:OR you could stop worrying about theories of signal processing and artefacts and just make good music.

I highly doubt it matters all that much these days if you use a decent quality EQ whether you are boosting or reducing. I know people are always going on about keeping it simple and less is more but seriously unless you are coldplay you are probably going to be OK.
True that...

My first post come out much nerdier than I intended in the first place :lol:

james fox
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:02 am
Location: sarf

Post by james fox » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:16 pm

don't be afraid to be a nerd my friend :D

embrace it.

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:17 pm

It may not matter in terms of dsp stuff whether you're cutting or boosting, but how you approach these things makes a lot of difference sonically and musically :)

But yes... enough geekitude :6:
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:19 pm

Macc wrote:But yes... enough geekitude :6:
never!
Image

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:20 pm

:lol:

Puuuuruuueeerrghhhhhhh!!!!

PERFECT
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

martello
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: Estonia

Post by martello » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:22 pm

I find myself only cutting, very rarely boosting. Not knowingly, just...Have to try what boosting can do :D

slothrop
Posts: 2655
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:59 am

Post by slothrop » Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:07 pm

manray wrote:OR you could stop worrying about theories of signal processing and artefacts and just make good music.
It's a crazy idea, but it might just work...

User avatar
jobbanaught
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Hamburg / Germany

Post by jobbanaught » Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:44 pm

Deadly Habit wrote: Image

Muuuuaaahhhh....love that

User avatar
SickMan D
Posts: 908
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Post by SickMan D » Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:38 am

Good thread :4:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests