Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:05 pm
by spiderman
kid_a wrote:spiderman wrote:
stuff like this makes me question chase n status. they do some great productions but sum dodgey ones. you would think its cos they are finding their feet with dubstep, but they came with "bits" and "eastern jam" and those are sick but its gone downhill since then imo.
Saxon?
And ye, I prefer the original bassline to this one.
saxons good but bits is MUCH better.
saxon got rinnnnnnnsed to the point where i nearly got bored of it at raves.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:36 pm
by manray
spencerTron wrote:oh come on!
am i taking crazy pills or something?
sounds no different
the original bass riff has been re-arranged slightly and there's an LFO modulating filter at the start of it now..hardly a wealth of work gone into it...maybe thats what constitutes a VIP mix though? right?
Basically 99% the same they have just added added some double hits to the bass to give more hypement feel.
Pure jokes.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:39 pm
by hackman
yawn, sick of the original to be honest, imo their only decent tune is bits
madhouse and runnin are shite
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:09 pm
by aporia1
...oh yeah! sick, 5 5 5 and lighter is up too
the vip is nasty
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:14 pm
by quidz
sorry..but i have to join the bits gang too..after enjoying hearing eastern jam or saxon etc for the first time they now arent very interesting at all. Bits is the only one that has stood the test of time for me..I remember being pretty stoked when youngsta mixed it with skreams "filth".
Sorry C & S all the other tunes so far lack something that bits has.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:52 pm
by claw
pretty cool tune...id play it out
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:14 pm
by abs
Doesn't really sound that different to be honest, it's quite a lazy remix.. can't see what the fuss is about.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:29 pm
by ST100
Its ok, I like the OG better though
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:20 am
by bandshell
-
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:16 am
by djfoster
hard vip! compliments!
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:20 am
by wooda916
aoowwwwwwwwww!
siiick! nasty bizniss...
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:36 pm
by le_hardcore_chiefus
seems its a foregone conlusion...bits is the 1...standing the test of what seems to be a short time when in music especially dubstep
get bits out on wax biatches
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:39 pm
by ST100
Le_Hardcore_Chiefus wrote:get bits out on wax biatches
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:03 pm
by yong
They should stop using "Brutal Electro"
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:09 pm
by sofabed
Start : Stop wrote:spencerTron wrote:oh come on!
am i taking crazy pills or something?
sounds no different
the original bass riff has been re-arranged slightly and there's an LFO modulating filter at the start of it now..hardly a wealth of work gone into it...maybe thats what constitutes a VIP mix though? right?
Imo that is the point of a VIP, it can't be too different to the original otherwise it's basically a remix.
I like it, it's enough to make it different to the original
All of this very truesay.
I like it, i think it's a nice little re touch they've put on that bass. But i am deffo all over the original
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:00 pm
by ammo
tune was masive at fwd
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:24 pm
by spiderman
its good, but the original is great
heard it again on rinse just now, youngsta dropped it again. cos i herd it for the first time unexpectedly in the best context on that plastic people system, it sits well with me. memories of that juiced up bass come to mind STRAIGHT AWAY.
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:51 pm
by jayou
fuckin rude.
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:14 pm
by string
always prefered the bit 32 bars(maybe 64) in from the drop in the original where they got rid of the mid range bass messyness and it rolls proper nicely, seems like its the same in the vip
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:22 pm
by pre-thought process
yong wrote:They should stop using "Brutal Electro"
Out to my Massive users