Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:14 am
by quidz
cmon now guys i thought we all settled on aqua crunk

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:52 am
by skywave
Saphyre wrote:indie as an umbrella term for all the music associated with that scene
ah OK, i'm old to enough to remember it the first time round and it was a different thing
kinda the way electro now means house music for car adverts to some folk now, things get confusing for old timers
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:13 pm
by renegatus
INCREASE THA PEACE/////
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:53 pm
by j_j_c
Why do people always have to have a name for genres? after a while it's just feutile beacuse there are so many genres and subgenres.
can't we just settle on a broad term like experimental hip hop or leftfield or something?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:45 pm
by constrobuz
j_j_c wrote:Why do people always have to have a name for genres?
because it's convenient. do you want people to put mike slott and drumma boy in the same genre?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:48 pm
by j_j_c
Constrobuz wrote:because it's convenient. do you want people to put mike slott and drumma boy in the same genre?
yes.
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:20 pm
by renegatus
W---y is omnipotent.
W---y is omnipresent.
W---y is indefinable.
We must never utter the name of w---y.
Re: Someone help me out with W---y
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:40 pm
by tercerojista
Clovework wrote:New user here, just curious....why/how did Wonky become "the genre that dare not speak its name"?
You read Martin Clark's article, so you know where the term originated.
After the term started getting a bit of use, people started arguing because they didn't like the name or didn't think it was necessary to give a name to music that shared certain characteristics.
Some critics started hurling abuse at anyone who used the word, claiming that they didn't have a clue what they were talking about. Simon Reynolds took a lot of heat: perhaps more heat than he's taken for a lot of redundant tripe that's come out of his excited mouth in the past.
Zomby wrote on his blog - with some conviction - that you can't make a genre called "wonky", because "adjectives can't function as noun's (sic)". Anyone who understands language might be inclined to point out that Zomby should learn how to use the possessive before making out he's some sort of authority on grammar and the evolution of language.
The argument's got so beyond a joke now that you might as well just steer clear of the word. That said, in spite of everything, the guys running this site have kept the description of the Hip Hop subforum as "Wonky". Really, there should be some sort of uprising over that little detail...
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 4:29 pm
by bellybelle
i just can't bring myself to call specifically left-field/experimental hip hop "wonky" personally. so i've been calling it left-field, which makes sense to me since the main thing is it is a small sphere within hip hop that is a bit more experimental, eclectic, and technical from a producing standpoint.
i can't speak for all the other things thrown into this "wonky" field. I mean....no matter how much I like Eprom.....putting Eprom in the same category as devon(who) and jneiro jarel just doesn't make sense to me.
good thing for me is that when it comes to shopping, i can find some of what i'm looking for under wonky but thankfully I'm finding a bit more of what I'm looking for *exactly* (stylistically and sonically) whenever I do a search for left-field hip hop. for me, thats the only reason I want a name--so that when I'm trying to find more music like it, I have something to look for.
To each his own tho. You can call it wonky....something about that term has a broken connotation and I just don't really think of it that way. I think of this as an avant-garde evolution--and there's nothing "broken" about that to me.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 4:32 pm
by 2tall
i am so wonky right now
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 6:49 pm
by pidge
bellybelle wrote:good thing for me is that when it comes to shopping, i can find some of what i'm looking for under wonky but thankfully I'm finding a bit more of what I'm looking for *exactly* (stylistically and sonically) whenever I do a search for left-field hip hop. for me, thats the only reason I want a name--so that when I'm trying to find more music like it, I have something to look for.
yeah, the wonky name tends to be given to the more electronic rather then instrument side of things. Thats why I dont mind the term becasue the more electronic/strange stuff is the stuff I like. But I know better then to use the term around here

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 10:18 pm
by j-sh
instrumental hip hop?
surely.
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 10:46 pm
by 2tall
i am so instrumental right now
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 11:58 pm
by Pallms
J-sh wrote:instrumental hip hop?
surely.
Exactly.
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 5:23 am
by westernsynthetics
its all wanky to me

Re: Someone help me out with W---y
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 7:55 am
by mrbeatnick
tercerojista wrote:Clovework wrote:New user here, just curious....why/how did Wonky become "the genre that dare not speak its name"?
You read Martin Clark's article, so you know where the term originated.
After the term started getting a bit of use, people started arguing because they didn't like the name or didn't think it was necessary to give a name to music that shared certain characteristics.
Some critics started hurling abuse at anyone who used the word, claiming that they didn't have a clue what they were talking about. Simon Reynolds took a lot of heat: perhaps more heat than he's taken for a lot of redundant tripe that's come out of his excited mouth in the past.
Zomby wrote on his blog - with some conviction - that you can't make a genre called "wonky", because "adjectives can't function as noun's (sic)". Anyone who understands language might be inclined to point out that Zomby should learn how to use the possessive before making out he's some sort of authority on grammar and the evolution of language.
The argument's got so beyond a joke now that you might as well just steer clear of the word. That said, in spite of everything, the guys running this site have kept the description of the Hip Hop subforum as "Wonky". Really, there should be some sort of uprising over that little detail...
haha. great summary. i think maybe it's fun to keep the word "wonky" there for a in-joke. i think the whole thing is quite funny now
i just read a review of my mates today that called them post-hop and - check this - meta-grime. what the fuck is meta grime? jesus.
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 8:15 am
by incnic
put a wonk on it
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 8:51 am
by 2tall
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 2:58 pm
by donovansharp
2tall wrote:basically the consensus is.. would you want you're music to be classified as "wonky".. its kind of a stupid name for a genre.
There is a 19 pg thread on "Skwee" haha who comes up with these names?
I personally like the term flunky, but whatever
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 3:01 pm
by donovansharp
Don't even get me started on the Simon Reynolds/ Zomby / K article. Does this guy try to piss me off with everything he writes? Get back to me when he listens to Polyfolk Blues or Velvet Peel.