Midrange?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
alphacat
Posts: 6016
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:52 pm

Post by alphacat » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:41 am

Part of the issue around this also has to do with the playback source being targeted by the producer: big gut-tickling subs simply don't come through on acoustically limited devices like iPods, but the midrange stuff tends to do so. Many people are suspicious of attempts to get the sound out to a broader audience by pitching it at the earbud crowd instead of the dancefloor, and I have to say their suspicions aren't totally unfounded.

Despite the best efforts of some to hijack it, much of this music is still deeply rooted (thankfully) in Dub sound system-ism and the Dub aesthetic. What is that exactly? Well, for starters it's bottom heavy like Kim Kardashian; for another thing there's an absolute sense of SPACE. Like the famous equation says, "Dubstep = space + pace + bass." (Was it Joe Nice said that? I forget...)

With the so-called "midrange cackery" the mids are often so prominent and busy [compared to the rest of the mix] that both the sense of space & pace get lost, and the bass becomes more of a low midrange lead synth than a true low end bass.

That said-

there's room for everything. A good song is a good song regardless of it's EQ curve or even recording deficiencies - and a well-produced song, conversely, is not the same thing as a well-written song...

User avatar
yamaz
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:03 am
Location: Pluto

nice

Post by yamaz » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:59 am

BUMP - lets talk about this more!

I've really enjoyed this thread, and I personally like either or as long as it's done well. But I'm certainly tired of hearing DJ's playung shitty music with too much midrange while clipping red. I'm really enjoying good a good rub-a-sub-dub-down!
"The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time."
-Jack Kerouac
Soundcloud

jsilver
Posts: 1164
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:31 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Post by jsilver » Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:34 am

we call it bass music because it's about bass, if it were about sub we'd be calling it sub music

sub plays a major roll because sub *is* bass, but saying that a certain part of the bass spectrum doesn't belong in a style of electronic music is absurd

saying that harsh midrange basses (cack) annoys you is personal preference, but there is no part of the bass spectrum that you as a producer should avoid

nothing is stopping you from making irritating sounds in that spectrum, but i'd rather you do that than have a dirty mix

J

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: nice

Post by deadly_habit » Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:59 am

Yamaz wrote:BUMP - lets talk about this more!

I've really enjoyed this thread, and I personally like either or as long as it's done well. But I'm certainly tired of hearing DJ's playung shitty music with too much midrange while clipping red. I'm really enjoying good a good rub-a-sub-dub-down!
well anyone running in the red is a shit dj heh
even with midrange it's good to layer some sines in the sub range that way you cater to both ranges

User avatar
halo skycrash
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by halo skycrash » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:08 am

Another cool thing about this thread. I had to look up the word 'cack'. Never heard this word used in the States. I'll spread the word like wildfire.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:15 am

Halo Skycrash wrote:Another cool thing about this thread. I had to look up the word 'cack'. Never heard this word used in the States. I'll spread the word like wildfire.
Awesome dude:D
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
julesee
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:27 am
Location: Phx, Arizona

Post by julesee » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:42 pm

a lot of people hate on "mid range wobblers," yet everyone is all about coki - goblin. I can't tolerate that song at a loud volume for any more than 1 minute

I guess seniority scares off the shit talkers in coki's scenario

User avatar
POND LIFE
Posts: 846
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Watford

Post by POND LIFE » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:48 pm

yeah it is a bit weird how you never see a single person hating on coki when often his tunes have almost no sub, or the sub only comes in when the b-line hits higher notes. i quite like that effect though.

not that im part of the mid hate crew at all, just an observation.
POND LIFE - various dirty halfstep sounds a la Watford/Southsea
http://www.myspace.com/pondlifemusic
proud member of GET HYPE COLLECTIVE
http://gethypecollective.blogspot.com/
Forthcoming releases on Code of Arms Records, New York
http://www.coa-records.com/

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:44 pm

it's just a certain hater on here :lol:
love you futures

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:50 pm

I never realised cack went so deep... :o

I personally refer to the type of sound exemplified in Skreams 'Simple City' as cack, not the frequency range. The 'brutal electro' style patch is the defualt reset for cackmiesters. Cack isn't bassy, but can be layered very easily with subby sounds, so that isn't really a problem.

I guess it boils down to whether you like that raw abbrassive sound or not? I prefer the midrange part of hoovers personally, but each to their own.

Nuff lulz in this thread though :o :)

User avatar
halo skycrash
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by halo skycrash » Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:54 pm

julesee wrote:a lot of people hate on "mid range wobblers," yet everyone is all about coki - goblin. I can't tolerate that song at a loud volume for any more than 1 minute

I guess seniority scares off the shit talkers in coki's scenario
Nah, who cares if Coki has been doing it a year longer than the other guy. A year isn't that long. Listen to someone like Lory D for something that has lasted. He started when the rave scene began and hes still out there.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests