Dubstepforum.com

tronman wrote:

Corpsey wrote:I think its the way it dramatically pitches down 'you' each time, it sounds a bit comical.

he pitches down the 'you' in Archangel wayyy more i'd say??

I can't explain why it jars me more on the near dark sample

Also I don't want to argue about pitch, its like wanking about architecture or whatever that phrase is that someone always trots out at this point

masstronaut wrote:Argh! Stop quoting it!

dont see the point really

Corpsey wrote:

tronman wrote:

Corpsey wrote:I think its the way it dramatically pitches down 'you' each time, it sounds a bit comical.

he pitches down the 'you' in Archangel wayyy more i'd say??

I can't explain why it jars me more on the near dark sample

Also I don't want to argue about pitch, its like wanking about architecture or whatever that phrase is that someone always trots out at this point

"Writing about music is like litening to architecture" Elvis Costello

stanton wrote:

Xothermic wrote:I'm not sure if you're allowed to post this or even if it has been posted but...

Archangel samples ________ and Untrue samples ________. Maybe people would find that interesting, dunno.

About the album, it hasn't left my cd player in 2 days...going on 3.

NOOOOOooooooooo! Don't tell us what the samples are! I so didn't want to know that.

I want to know what samples he's used. NOW

elvis costello was a c*** any relation of YOURS

7" I can see you're online - please check your PMs.

Thanks.

masstronaut wrote:7" I can see you're online - please check your PMs.

Thanks.

Geez, spying my status eh?

haha

NINE wrote:

uh uhh!
these are blushing, in love

im bored of it now.

there's a prize for anyone who can tell me how many eastenders samples there are in Untrue, and from which characters.

metalboxproducts wrote:
"Writing about music is like litening to architecture" Elvis Costello

whatever you do, do not hire Costello Architechts to design your recording studio.

Amazing album, Ive been listening to it non stop since it came out. Was walkin round town at 4am this mornin listenin to it on my headphones, some atmospherical shit right there

Good album, really enjoyed it from start to finish. The guys a real heroe, making something so fresh and original.

No offense at all to the mods but I don't see the point of censoring sample talk. The source is very obvious on many of the vocal samples! Especially the rnb ones. I think if he were scared about people recognizing them, he'd have made them more unrecognizable.

damn, those are some big samples. very risky. i hope the majors don't catch wind of it. a man could lose everything getting sued by the original copyright owners, and the album would instantly go out of print.

inaya wrote:No offense at all to the mods but I don't see the point of censoring sample talk.

Word, still cant see the problem, we dont even know which moves they did to use those samples! i dont want to feel like i have spent my money on something "illegal".

tone.def wrote:damn, those are some big samples. very risky. i hope the majors don't catch wind of it. a man could lose everything getting sued by the original copyright owners, and the album would instantly go out of print.

nah the owners would only be entitled to royalties, so no-one would lose their house over the matter. but given the sales of the 1st album its a more sizable target than most.

[quote="sully_shanks"][quote="tone.def"]damn, those are some big samples. very risky. i hope the majors don't catch wind of it. a man could lose everything getting sued by the original copyright owners, and the album would instantly go out of print.[/quote]

nah the owners would only be entitled to royalties, so no-one would lose their house over the matter. but given the sales of the 1st album its a more sizable target than most.[/quote]

only royalties? i wish it were that simple. the original owners of the sampled music could do a lot worse if they wanted. first step would be to put a halt on all production and sales of the album. that in and of itself is less than ideal for a young new artist getting tons of press.

i doubt hyperdub ever cleared those samples, but they are still totally liable. with the majors hemorrhaging money, they are going after smaller and smaller fish for legal action and money.

inaya wrote:No offense at all to the mods but I don't see the point of censoring sample talk. The source is very obvious on many of the vocal samples! Especially the rnb ones. I think if he were scared about people recognizing them, he'd have made them more unrecognizable.

none taken, but it's only that by doing so you spider the associations into search engines. all record companies do random searching of their artists, and by having it up here in a connect-the-dots- manner, it's certainly not helping hyperdub at all.

our interests are to help out the labels in this scene and not play sherlock holmes in minutiae about every detail and every tune.

the internet is permanent now. it's being archived every 48hrs. if a person knows what the sample is, what's the need to broadcast it? is it to make people feel smart on the internet? i don't get it, and i never will.

sully_shanks wrote:

tone.def wrote:damn, those are some big samples. very risky. i hope the majors don't catch wind of it. a man could lose everything getting sued by the original copyright owners, and the album would instantly go out of print.

nah the owners would only be entitled to royalties, so no-one would lose their house over the matter. but given the sales of the 1st album its a more sizable target than most.

Goes much deeper than that: someone owns the picture, someone owns the script, someone owns the voice talent, someone owns the rights to release soundtrack/clips, possibly different people/companies in different territories...all need to give clearance, all want money. If they do get wind of it, they'll pull the lp immediately, no mistake.