Dubstepforum.com

haha it took me 11 years to get a bfa

wrong section

Motorway to Roswell wrote:wrong section

I'm sorry Roswell..

Here's another to put it back on track..3 Times

<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYOnv2nR59o" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>

bright maroon wrote:

Motorway to Roswell wrote:wrong section

I'm sorry Roswell..

Here's another to put it back on track..3 Times

<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYOnv2nR59o" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>

Nah, I was talking about my post. I edited it quickly.

Classic Coen Brothers. Really enjoyed it despite nothing really happening.
I got mixed messages about the meaning of the film; It showed the futility of worrying or it was a story about a family cursed. Hence the opening scene. Or maybe both.
Either way the film made up for the shitfest that was Burn after Rreading.

baron_von_carlton wrote:Classic Coen Brothers. Really enjoyed it despite nothing really happening.
I got mixed messages about the meaning of the film; It showed the futility of worrying or it was a story about a family cursed. Hence the opening scene. Or maybe both.
Either way the film made up for the shitfest that was Burn after Rreading.

i think it's saying that god has a plan, and to trust in it even when you can't see the point.

it also says to hunker down cuz shit is bout to hit the fan.

Last one was mentioned in Kode9's book, very odd.

They just don't make films of this calibre any more:

baron_von_carlton wrote:
Classic Coen Brothers. Really enjoyed it despite nothing really happening.
I got mixed messages about the meaning of the film; It showed the futility of worrying or it was a story about a family cursed. Hence the opening scene. Or maybe both.
Either way the film made up for the shitfest that was Burn after Rreading.

Burn after Reading really was terrible.

I wonder how much of Serious Man is based on truth, the well-shaped series of anecdotes is really what makes the film so good and believable. The introspective Jewish caricatures are perfectly balanced, not so off beat that you write it off but not so boring that you don't really care about them. IMO it's definitely been crafted from real experiences in Minnesota of the Coens' youth. Probably a semi-autobiographical work. It's the kind of film that only gets made once you're established at making good films, it has that artistic free reign to it that you only get with established artists, writers and film makers.

No Country for Old Men is still their finest hour for me, incredible film.

firky wrote:

baron_von_carlton wrote:
Classic Coen Brothers. Really enjoyed it despite nothing really happening.
I got mixed messages about the meaning of the film; It showed the futility of worrying or it was a story about a family cursed. Hence the opening scene. Or maybe both.
Either way the film made up for the shitfest that was Burn after Rreading.

Burn after Reading really was terrible.

I wonder how much of Serious Man is based on truth, the well-shaped series of anecdotes is really what makes the film so good and believable. The introspective Jewish caricatures are perfectly balanced, not so off beat that you write it off but not so boring that you don't really care about them. IMO it's definitely been crafted from real experiences in Minnesota of the Coens' youth. Probably a semi-autobiographical work. It's the kind of film that only gets made once you're established at making good films, it has that artistic free reign to it that you only get with established artists, writers and film makers.

No Country for Old Men is still their finest hour for me, incredible film.

Correction, THIS is their best

just watched


was much better than expected (although im not quite sure what i might have expected....), i would recommend it.

very very good, havn't seen a bad sean penn performance

deepfiend wrote:

firky wrote:

baron_von_carlton wrote:
Classic Coen Brothers. Really enjoyed it despite nothing really happening.
I got mixed messages about the meaning of the film; It showed the futility of worrying or it was a story about a family cursed. Hence the opening scene. Or maybe both.
Either way the film made up for the shitfest that was Burn after Rreading.

Burn after Reading really was terrible.

I wonder how much of Serious Man is based on truth, the well-shaped series of anecdotes is really what makes the film so good and believable. The introspective Jewish caricatures are perfectly balanced, not so off beat that you write it off but not so boring that you don't really care about them. IMO it's definitely been crafted from real experiences in Minnesota of the Coens' youth. Probably a semi-autobiographical work. It's the kind of film that only gets made once you're established at making good films, it has that artistic free reign to it that you only get with established artists, writers and film makers.

No Country for Old Men is still their finest hour for me, incredible film.

Correction, THIS is their best

The Big Lebowski and Barton Fink for me.

Motorway to Roswell wrote:

deepfiend wrote:

firky wrote:

baron_von_carlton wrote:
Classic Coen Brothers. Really enjoyed it despite nothing really happening.
I got mixed messages about the meaning of the film; It showed the futility of worrying or it was a story about a family cursed. Hence the opening scene. Or maybe both.
Either way the film made up for the shitfest that was Burn after Rreading.

Burn after Reading really was terrible.

I wonder how much of Serious Man is based on truth, the well-shaped series of anecdotes is really what makes the film so good and believable. The introspective Jewish caricatures are perfectly balanced, not so off beat that you write it off but not so boring that you don't really care about them. IMO it's definitely been crafted from real experiences in Minnesota of the Coens' youth. Probably a semi-autobiographical work. It's the kind of film that only gets made once you're established at making good films, it has that artistic free reign to it that you only get with established artists, writers and film makers.

No Country for Old Men is still their finest hour for me, incredible film.

Correction, THIS is their best

The Big Lebowski and Barton Fink for me.

im still yet to see barton fink , out of the coen films i've seen though i'd have to say it'd be the big laboswki and no country that i've enjoyed the most

I didn't think that Burn After Reading was that bad. I came out of the cinema feeling mildly entertained, sure it wasn't a masterpiece but it certainly wasn't the worst film I've seen.

Coppola wrote:I didn't think that Burn After Reading was that bad. I came out of the cinema feeling mildly entertained, sure it wasn't a masterpiece but it certainly wasn't the worst film I've seen.

I agree.

ladykillers was worse

parson wrote:ladykillers was worse

Werd. Can't believe they did that. There was no reason to remake it. The original is brilliant.