Dubstepforum.com

I've turned away from straight accapellas

it's easier making a sample that hasn't been phased and re-phased go in a mix despite it having maybe a piano or something on top.. they are just too dead most of the thyme

i dont care if theres extra drums either in there because I'll just beat them up with my drums - - - - subjective

yeah thats a dif approach def

but for the effects i like to use the driest ,most cleanest and best quali acapella is the best
autotune melodyne all those work better if the sorce is clean

This acaprlla isn't phase inverted its just a recording of a voice

ah i see yeah no i am talking about real studio acapellas
there are alot of those stolen i asume or given away but you will find alot of real recordings i dont like the selfmade ones either

Samuel_L_Damnson wrote:This acaprlla isn't phase inverted its just a recording of a voice

most of the internet accapellas that are of the sort of fece invented mp3 variety all sound very good

Aufnahmewindwuschel wrote:yeah thats a dif approach def

but for the effects i like to use the driest ,most cleanest and best quali acapella is the best
autotune melodyne all those work better if the sorce is clean

My angle is more about turning the vox into either another instrument or use it like a form of percussion - so in that sense there could be a benefit to how a prog 'miscalculates' and then you get something other.

All about other for me.

Currently raping this acapella with effects to make it sound weird. Already autotuned it looool

My mind never ceased to 'think' about this yesterday lol

what i want to say is that vocals are a lot like breaks in like how they are recorded and done stuff to which is totes obvs but...

yo hows that collab coming along?

ah yeah we have to start sth hm i think we kinda need a direction we all wanna go before we start
thats how i do it like think of sth i wanna hear haha

i juuuust pm bud

amazing timing again

i take full responsibility
but my ear is coming around if you can say that

maybe a good idea to start three tracks at once tho
just sayin

no worries, i'll get something started too

Tutorial

[+] Spoiler

So I've been thinking of a way to make some subjectively original stuff to get a more three dimensional (sub) bass going.
Thinking that it could be a good idea to re-sample the overtones and place them in a different spot. Try to get some sort of organic distortion.
I wanted to create the sound of a bass cabinet or desk or something reacting and fucking up like it was overdriven by bass. Like extreme 'rattling' but still tonal. You know how you have a good bass sound if the teaspoon rattles in an empty cup placed infront of the monitors - sort of logic.
Now comes the silly.
So to get it really extreme I hung these rythm egg/maraca thingies onto the mic stand and placed a rainstick so it balanced against the mic slightly rattling. And then recorded the sub being played out of the monitors into a live room with all that stuff dangling..+ sizzling cooking sounds from the kitchen. Next was then to highpass most of the sub leaving the overtones and then volume adjust them with the original sub. Like... I wouldn't usually do something as elaborately certifiable as this....all by myself.. but that natural bass phemomenon has just buggered me forever. So this was atleast some crazy way to sort of conceptualize that and it worked . But that was not the point, more like I urge people to go such lenghts because it's fun and I don't think the 'results' can ever dissappoint when you invest X and leave the criteria super vague like that. It sheds some light on why it can't be done at worst- - but then it's probably still a good fx sound.. hmm ..

ah yess, that natural distortion
the bass on this thru anything would be great to sample for something like that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpQM5IQ ... wBhUUL4VFq

yeah love that bass there

ok if anybody has sth this week would be cool to send it to me next couple of hours
cause atm i just got tunes from jizz(he sended in three tunes though )

ah yea shit
Ill send u this random shitty thing i recorded the other day

ok mini tuna

JIZZ
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

GENRL
Soundcloud

BUD
Soundcloud

Ill do the feed back soon I swear aha. Been dead busy getting smashed

hubb wrote:Tutorial

[+] Spoiler

So I've been thinking of a way to make some subjectively original stuff to get a more three dimensional (sub) bass going.
Thinking that it could be a good idea to re-sample the overtones and place them in a different spot. Try to get some sort of organic distortion.
I wanted to create the sound of a bass cabinet or desk or something reacting and fucking up like it was overdriven by bass. Like extreme 'rattling' but still tonal. You know how you have a good bass sound if the teaspoon rattles in an empty cup placed infront of the monitors - sort of logic.
Now comes the silly.
So to get it really extreme I hung these rythm egg/maraca thingies onto the mic stand and placed a rainstick so it balanced against the mic slightly rattling. And then recorded the sub being played out of the monitors into a live room with all that stuff dangling..+ sizzling cooking sounds from the kitchen. Next was then to highpass most of the sub leaving the overtones and then volume adjust them with the original sub. Like... I wouldn't usually do something as elaborately certifiable as this....all by myself.. but that natural bass phemomenon has just buggered me forever. So this was atleast some crazy way to sort of conceptualize that and it worked . But that was not the point, more like I urge people to go such lenghts because it's fun and I don't think the 'results' can ever dissappoint when you invest X and leave the criteria super vague like that. It sheds some light on why it can't be done at worst- - but then it's probably still a good fx sound.. hmm ..

The best, and not even very elaborate, was an ant running around on a high end LDC. Not what I expected at all. It was more like a tone with a slightly rounded saw wave lfo on it. The legs are so fast, they don't create individual little taps, but there is some kind of larger, slower frequency to the sequence of the moving legs, maybe it is all 6 legs completing their cycle, I don't know.

Miss you tunaites.