Page 15 of 16
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 6:52 pm
by surface_tension
I disagree that there are TYPES of Dubstep. We shouldn't be drawing lines in the sand. Point blank, if you play an entire set of any particular like-sounds, you are a shitty DJ.
Progression through a DJ set is the way forward.
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:12 am
by luthor
Surely, listen to what you want, call it what you want, play it as you want, describe it how you want, make it what you want.... Whatever. .. .
Yeah you can label some tunes but that's a matter of opinion and mood surely. . .
So my bottom line is that music is mostly a personal thing i find, whether you call it dubstep, liquid dubstep whatever. People take in the sounds and apply it to there feelings/mood etc
Maybe if you was going to label a genre i wud say it must go on the speed/tempo of the track or by the feel of the sounds, say the whole point im on this DUBSTEPforum is that just so happens that the tracks i produce fit very well with what is discussed on here, say a tempo around 120-140bpm . . . which i guess can be called dubstep. . . and yes i wud say there are different types but thats my own opinion as in i can listen to what i have and place them in to different catagories whether i label the catagory or not, could be just the feeling of the tune rather than the label it may of been given. . .
I think that makes sense and realy i think the worse thing that can happen with any music is if it is forced into sticking to certain rules and to be fair that realy, for me destroys some types of music. . . but as there is so much out there and its always being made im sure things wud never get so bad because there are always new things being created.
so yeah dont get stuck on labeling tunes, use ur energy up on listening to em and just enjoy them . .. . isnt that what it is all about ??????
safe
LUTHOR
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 7:15 pm
by nicon
if quest whould make "liquid dubstep" all the time.. i whould be dissapointed.. if anybody said that i whould be dissapointed..
just make (dubstep)music and see where it goes isnt that been the vibe all along?
lots of big tunes out there these days and everything sounds different... so yeah.. why stop?
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 10:01 pm
by Cosine
Although I hate sub-genres in dubstep, I do love that kind of liquid sound, but its just a style. But yeah, that liquid sound really does give it something, tracks like "Alicia" by Mala, ahhhh so good! And anything by L-Wiz
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:56 am
by blasta
Rogue Star wrote:
Less talk more tunes.

Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 3:52 pm
by d+
Kulture wrote:S.A.M wrote:Kulture wrote:what's wrong with bonobo?
Nowt wrong with bonobo, its relaxing and nice but its NOT DUBSTEP AND i DONT WANNA SEE IT BECOME DUBSTEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
haha, chill. Everyone is treating "dubstep" as though it is their child. Sometimes children need to be set free from what you want. I'm sure they'll make their own way in life.
Imagine if you had a forum set up where people came and discussed how you should live your life.
We can't keep things exactly how we want them.. otherwise they will never have been better or worse. They will exist in a singularity of nothingness and then the universe could become unstable. Do you really wanna be responsible for the collapse of the universe? Perhaps yes..
Do you really want this musical movement to stop moving?
the realest of talk
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:15 pm
by test_recordings
I like 'liquidy' dubstep, i.e. it sounds and feels like liquid. I've heard melted-down garage that sounded bloody phat; all dubbed, warped and spacious

Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:30 pm
by slothrop
I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.
As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.
We can learn a lot from this, I think.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:46 pm
by nousd
Remember referring to liquid dubstep in 07
& getting a big

Evenso, I appreciate the anti-subgenre thing
if it's against unnecessary rifts.
The pressure of popularity & commercialism is divisive enough.
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:49 pm
by e_o
blasta wrote:Rogue Star wrote:
Less talk more tunes.

for real

Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 10:47 pm
by 3/2kick
Surface_Tension wrote:I disagree that there are TYPES of Dubstep. We shouldn't be drawing lines in the sand. Point blank, if you play an entire set of any particular like-sounds, you are a shitty DJ.
Progression through a DJ set is the way forward.

yes the best sets always have a bit of everything

Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 10:50 pm
by mondays child
Mix and match, Yin and Yang, Coffee and Cream, Rice and Peas....Err I've lost me train of thought now.
You get the idea anyway!

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:39 pm
by elementalism
Bumped.
Quest was on to something with this one, for real! This thread is the truth.

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:01 pm
by vertx
Old thread delivers

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:01 pm
by fractal
wow, blast from the past~
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:42 pm
by low density matter
Shameless Sound Cloud bump while we're discussing the term "Liquid",although i wrote this tune in 2007

>>>
Liquid Dimension
Soundcloud
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:07 pm
by liquicityDubstep
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:44 pm
by SCope13
this thread lol
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:49 pm
by StrangeFlow
yea, i agree melody is definitely good. also agree with the color statement, exactly agree, some of the super hardcore dubstep does sound black an white to me, (not that it isn't fun once in awhile

) but yes, melody is always good, IMO, and I'm a random fella. haha.