Thinking out loud...

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Wall of text. Definitely a wall of text.

Post by wub » Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:28 am

Paradox - Crate Logic

Image

The original drum & bass b-boy is back! Paradox returns with his latest 12" on Samurai Red Seal, a straight up ode to break culture referencing crate digging and respecting the groove...

In many ways, you are one of the truest drum & bass artists, in that your style and ideology follows the original blueprint of hardcore and jungle. Tough breaks with clear lines bridging the gaps with funk and hip hop culture. In 2013, much of what is broadly under the umbrella of drum & bass doesn't really reference thr roots of the music in the same way, be it due to either technology or just different routes to a common middle ground. Being known for your outwardly staunch attitude to what is right for the genre, where do you find yourself as a musician and the state of b-boyism at 170 BPM in 2013?

I find myself still doing what I love musically and feeling like a kid at xmas when a new 12" is in my hands. I'm lucky because I've been in the Jungle scene from day one so with that experience behind my belt I learnt to stick to my guns and do whatever I feel. I'm kinda militant due to the stripes I guess.
"I’m not detached from my peers but I don't see myself as part of a current collective and that's not a bad thing."
B-boyism in today’s drum & bass is a difficult one and that’s down to the speed. Most b-boy breaks looped above 170 BPM are difficult to control from a funky percussion perspective so producers kinda throw b-boyism out of the window most of the time. Personally I can't stand hearing breaks played out so fast that sound like a continuous drum roll. I etched on my last Dirty City 12" a message on the vinyl not to play the track at +plus pitches because it simply destroys the funk. Modern drum & bass is exactly what it is, but there’s lots of good music out there that address the problem in other ways.

Soundcloud

The last 5 years has seen several of what could be described as "core" artists move away from break heavy drum & bass. People like Breakage and Kryptic Minds have moved away from the genre altogether while people like Fracture have refined their style falling closer to the mainstream of the genre. Music always seems most exciting when there is a sense of a collective movement, how far do you see what you do as part of a current collective cause?

I’m not detached from my peers but I don't see myself as part of a current collective and that's not a bad thing. I'm just a programmer tuning and re-tuning my craft which is a personal obsession and a crate digging thing that goes over most people’s heads in drum & bass to be honest. One magazine review stated I was a programmer plying my trade in a wrong genre, and to an extent that’s true. I’ve released over 40 tracks on vinyl around 140 bpm also but I really love writing music at a fast pace and recreating 1970's drum patterns for foot-shufflers.

"Scorpius"/ "Crate Logic" is your 147th release, which is ridiculous in itself... How many more breaks are there to be manipulated? Are there still illusive breaks out there to be found?

It's a gold mine and that’s exactly what digging is. There are breaks in abundance out there and plenty that producers still shun because of the tempo thing I mentioned earlier. My mentality is different because of my persistence and experience in keeping to the original core of drum & bass with funk breaks that ultimately kickback and swing.

In many ways "Crate Logic" is a kind of formulated "drum track" not dissimilar to those that you've previously released. The obvious difference being that whereas the drum tracks were grooves and ideas, "Crate Logic" is a fully realized track in its own right. Is it fair to say that in writing such a puristic track you have been met with the acclaim from much of the music press of writing one of your best tracks to date? Is there much you can tell us about the breaks employed? We hear there are a few top secret undercover numbers in there?

Every style has a formula and b-boy breaks are no different, the thing with "Crate Logic" is that the track itself is a theme. The vocal samples taken from b-boy sources are grooves in themselves and a message that points to the ethos so yeah it's different to previous drum workouts. Again, I don't expect everyone to grasp this or think the track is breaking new ground. It's just a b-boy thing to me. The samples are on the art so you have to buy the record and do a little research...
"My distributor will have a heart attack when I reveal the proposed manufacturing costs."
Where as "Crate Logic" explores the mind of paradox as a b-boy, "Scorpius" is an all together more sinister affair. Worthy as the sound track to the darkest film noir, "Scorpius" has the added nuances of disorientation and paranoia. What were the key influences behind the track?

Scorpius has an apocalyptic vibe and to me is typical eerie Paradox material. I wanted to base the track around Dennis Coffey's Scorpio break which isn't exactly rare but swings all over the shop. I don't think I can go really into the full drum process as I'd bore you to tears but the whole track took around six weeks to complete. Myself and Dj Trax used the break years ago and some breaks just don't age like Coffey's Scorpio. I spend ages writing tracks nowadays. I just can't knock them out in four hours waiting in an airport lounge.

The 12" is out on Samurai Red Seal. Samurai's Geoff Presha has been one of the key advocates of vinyl based drum & bass in the last few years through his several labels in the Samurai group. While this has been going on, there are also many more labels that have actively moved away from the format and also the closure of distributors. Does this all feel like the last chime for vinyl?

It's disheartening I'll admit, but rather than order myself an early headstone I'll continue to roll out 12"s on my labels and won’t stop unless pressing plants force me to. The thought of my labels turning into a filing cabinet makes my stomach churn but label’s like Samurai are keeping the vibe alive and that was just one of the many reasons why I had no hesitation in signing up with Samurai Red Seal even though I rarely do guest 12”s anymore. One of the sister labels is vinyl only too which is cool, creating a demand and keeping something exclusive for the consumer and all without digital revenue so hats off to Presha.

The artwork for the 12" seems to follow the loose theme of crate digging, a seemingly underground pass time that seems to be more practiced in the online world via discogs and the like with actual records shops vanishing year by year! Could drum & bass do with getting back to basics? Sifting through the plates hunting down those musical enigmas before dismantling and reassembling in a sampler?

This was the whole idea behind the 12" - to ignite a lost art form and maybe plant a seed into producers heads. Sample packs are great for instant loops but you can’t beat the crunch and groove of vinyl in my opinion. In today’s modern studio techniques the time consuming recording vinyl-into-sampler is probably a chore but I think both should still be explored. I also go through files myself so I won’t cut off all avenues.

We're guessing you are cooking up something a bit special for your 150th release?

My distributor will have a heart attack when I reveal the proposed manufacturing costs.

Both within and beyond drum & bass, who is carrying the torch for you musically or otherwise in 2013?

I enjoy Sabre, Equinox, Loxy, ASC, Naibu, Gremlinz, Escher, Skeptical, Trax & Nucleus, Amit, Spktrm, Overlook, Seba, dBridge, outside of drum & bass cats like Funkshone, Mark de Clive Lowe, Marc Mac & Dego, Volcov, Kaidi Tatham, the list is endless really.

Where can we catch you performing soon?

I’ll be performing in Ireland, Germany and Russia next and then a USA Paradox PA tour performing the Samurai 12” live and returning to the UK for some shows in 2013.

Also watch out for the new Alaska & Robert Manos 12” entitled ‘Zeal’ out on March 18th on Arctic Music.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Wall of text. Definitely a wall of text.

Post by wub » Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:30 am

Thoughts: Living In The Future

Image

In a recent Organic video interview, dBridge made some interesting points about the nature of digital media, it's disposable nature and maybe it's potentially unsubstantial characteristics. With this in mind we had a look around at the way we live our lives and posed the question; "Are we living in the future?"

Just by emptying your own pockets you are instantly aware of the role modern technology plays in our ever more device led lives. Mobile phones connected to the internet, iPods and mp3 players, hand held games devices like the PSP or Nintendo DS. With all of which it is hard to imagine day to day life without.

dBridge's point extends beyond music. Recently I listened to a discussion on talk radio regarding the demise of the Borders book store group in the UK, part citing the role of E-books as a contributing factor. The consumption of film has changed also, it seems anything can be found for free online within a few clicks. It's not hard to imagine a world where we live out our lives entirely through a single multimedia device, with our entire social lives lived out through social networking site and our entertainment streamed in.

So what does this mean for drum & bass music and it's associated culture? The way we consume music has definitely changed in the last 10 years, this is certain. Even the club experience is now available remotely via live video feeds, most notably through Drum&BassArena's D&BTV club broadcasts. I have found myself opting to stay at home and watch the djs i wanted to see rather than actually going to the event itself, so there is potential to undermine the incentive to pay to go out. If this devalues the djs or the live experience i'm unsure. Being that it removes the limitations of location for the wider usership, It's probably a good thing.

Are we living in the future? Probably.

Is it always entirely positive? Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. What I can be sure of is that my media consumption is significantly cheaper than it was just a few years ago, and in what politicians call "an age of austerity" it's probably the deciding factor for many people...

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Wall of text. Definitely a wall of text.

Post by wub » Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:31 am

Food For Thought: Mediocre Music

Image

The availability of cheap and accessible production tools is something of a double edged sword. While it allows the previously less privileged would be musicians the opportunity to make and create music, it also allows every man and his dog to roll out a beat. So what? No big deal? Or does this vast sea of mediocre music have an effect further up stream?..

Recently while filming a yet to be released video feature with who we will call artist ''X'' for the sake of this feature, we touched on the evolutionary nature of the genre and they highlighted an interesting point regarding the amount of music they get sent. While it often ticks the boxes for technical grace and the production being of a generally good level it lacks innovation or any unique characteristics. So rather than having a lots of music that doesn't make the grade technicality, you have alot of music that just about gets there as an exercise in classically held production ideals but has no soul or personality. This can be in part attributed to the functional nature of a dance floor led genre and the assumptions made by would be producers on what a label wants. Therein lies the potential conflict within the motives of a musician...

Any genre, as a collective movement both musically and culturally is only as strong or rich as the sum of all it's parts. At times i've found this to be a really demotivating factor, especially with relation to the previously mentioned amount of insignificant music. How many tracks will stand the test of time? Production values evolve, technology moves on. Music being released now will sound old and tired in a few years. It is the music that dares to be reactionary or rebellious that will hold it's own. Calibre mentioned to us (although it didn't make the final cut) while filming recently that he doesn't like his own earlier releases and that there are some tracks that he regrets releasing, so it's an issue that goes all the way to top. Hindsight has taught us time and time again that the musical rebels and innovators are the ones who leave the most enduring mark... Photek, LTJ Bukem, Dillinja, Instra:mental, Reinforced collectively... There are more.

It would seem that the old mantra of quality over quantity is more apt than ever in 2011...

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:42 pm

Theo Parrish - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5USZQ97l9s
Pioneers of Electronic Music: Richie Hawtin (70 Min.) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bc6474KUBV8
Laurent Garnier - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7WYOXNXv5U

Short of inspiration, watch these.

See, done that thing where the rabbit holes of click thru links starts rushing past my ears;

How I Found the Secret to Happiness While Totally Naked - http://www.raptitude.com/2009/07/how-i- ... lly-naked/
“We could say that meditation doesn't have a reason or doesn't have a purpose. In this respect it's unlike almost all other things we do except perhaps making music and dancing. When we make music we don't do it in order to reach a certain point, such as the end of the composition. If that were the purpose of music then obviously the fastest players would be the best. Also, when we are dancing we are not aiming to arrive at a particular place on the floor as in a journey. When we dance, the journey itself is the point, as when we play music the playing itself is the point. And exactly the same thing is true in meditation. Meditation is the discovery that the point of life is always arrived at in the immediate moment.”

Alan Watts


Image

fragments
Posts: 3552
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: NEOhio
Contact:

Re: Wall of text. Definitely a wall of text.

Post by fragments » Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:00 pm

wub wrote:Food For Thought: Mediocre Music

Image

The availability of cheap and accessible production tools is something of a double edged sword. While it allows the previously less privileged would be musicians the opportunity to make and create music, it also allows every man and his dog to roll out a beat. So what? No big deal? Or does this vast sea of mediocre music have an effect further up stream?..

Recently while filming a yet to be released video feature with who we will call artist ''X'' for the sake of this feature, we touched on the evolutionary nature of the genre and they highlighted an interesting point regarding the amount of music they get sent. While it often ticks the boxes for technical grace and the production being of a generally good level it lacks innovation or any unique characteristics. So rather than having a lots of music that doesn't make the grade technicality, you have alot of music that just about gets there as an exercise in classically held production ideals but has no soul or personality. This can be in part attributed to the functional nature of a dance floor led genre and the assumptions made by would be producers on what a label wants. Therein lies the potential conflict within the motives of a musician...

Any genre, as a collective movement both musically and culturally is only as strong or rich as the sum of all it's parts. At times i've found this to be a really demotivating factor, especially with relation to the previously mentioned amount of insignificant music. How many tracks will stand the test of time? Production values evolve, technology moves on. Music being released now will sound old and tired in a few years. It is the music that dares to be reactionary or rebellious that will hold it's own. Calibre mentioned to us (although it didn't make the final cut) while filming recently that he doesn't like his own earlier releases and that there are some tracks that he regrets releasing, so it's an issue that goes all the way to top. Hindsight has taught us time and time again that the musical rebels and innovators are the ones who leave the most enduring mark... Photek, LTJ Bukem, Dillinja, Instra:mental, Reinforced collectively... There are more.

It would seem that the old mantra of quality over quantity is more apt than ever in 2011...

Not much to say other than :Q: I often feel I get viewed as some elitist prick for getting on people's cases because they are clearly jumping on a bandwagon and clearly whoring themselves to genre conventions. Well...maybe I am an elitist prick...but you know what? I don't give a fuck. I'm tired of the 16 y/os who go do their first E at a rave then decide a week later they are gonna be "X" artist...anyway I'm going to end this before it becomes a rant.

I think the democratization of music has been has much a bad thing as good. Because honestly, most of the stuff one has to trawl through is less than mediocre in terms of "soul" and often in technical terms as well.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Wall of text. Definitely a wall of text.

Post by wub » Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:13 pm

fragments wrote:Not much to say other than :Q: I often feel I get viewed as some elitist prick for getting on people's cases because they are clearly jumping on a bandwagon and clearly whoring themselves to genre conventions. Well...maybe I am an elitist prick...but you know what? I don't give a fuck. I'm tired of the 16 y/os who go do their first E at a rave then decide a week later they are gonna be "X" artist...anyway I'm going to end this before it becomes a rant.

I think the democratization of music has been has much a bad thing as good. Because honestly, most of the stuff one has to trawl through is less than mediocre in terms of "soul" and often in technical terms as well.

The same folk who think CLASSIC TUNES applies to all tracks taken after they first tried drugs, TBH.

I agree with the democratisation factor especially...the availability of tech has taken the shine off things massively. Particularly, the ease of downloading to find specific VST means there is nothing invested in acquiring such things, so if there is no investment of money then why invest any time in learning how to use it? Fuck, the same search engine that found you the torrent will also find you the patches, the tutorials, the guides on how to program the synth, so why spend any time learning when you can do a quick hop, skip & Google and start making THE BANGERZ.

fragments
Posts: 3552
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: NEOhio
Contact:

Re: Wall of text. Definitely a wall of text.

Post by fragments » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:59 pm

wub wrote:
fragments wrote:Not much to say other than :Q: I often feel I get viewed as some elitist prick for getting on people's cases because they are clearly jumping on a bandwagon and clearly whoring themselves to genre conventions. Well...maybe I am an elitist prick...but you know what? I don't give a fuck. I'm tired of the 16 y/os who go do their first E at a rave then decide a week later they are gonna be "X" artist...anyway I'm going to end this before it becomes a rant.

I think the democratization of music has been has much a bad thing as good. Because honestly, most of the stuff one has to trawl through is less than mediocre in terms of "soul" and often in technical terms as well.

The same folk who think CLASSIC TUNES applies to all tracks taken after they first tried drugs, TBH.

I agree with the democratisation factor especially...the availability of tech has taken the shine off things massively. Particularly, the ease of downloading to find specific VST means there is nothing invested in acquiring such things, so if there is no investment of money then why invest any time in learning how to use it? Fuck, the same search engine that found you the torrent will also find you the patches, the tutorials, the guides on how to program the synth, so why spend any time learning when you can do a quick hop, skip & Google and start making THE BANGERZ.

Amen. I completely agree. When I save up for something and finally get it I can't wait to dive into it. Though occasionally I've gotten lazy and not pounced on something the moment I get it home. I will sit on vinyl for ages, but when I see something cool and it's less than five bucks I typically buy it.

Um :oops: ..anyway. I also feel like this is, usually, a young person's attitude. I hate to always be pulling being a teacher up in conversions, but my impression of young people/college age kids is that they can barely be arsed to be C students. People don't even make up excuses anymore. The new things is that students just don't turn things in and don't care. I will say something like "You know that's a 0/100 right?" a typical response (w/ smiling face, unconcerned) "Oh yea, I know."

I feel like I see a different version of that on the Dubs board here, the production forum...I see it on IDMforums as well. Haven't been to DOA lately. Never really saw it there as much. But they used to be fucking vicious over there...lol.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Just some random things I've stumbled on whilst catching up

Post by wub » Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:37 am

So yeah, had a short break. Week at Glastonbury hearing good music, some familiar (Rolling Stones, Stanton Warriors, Dusky), some new (Sam & The Womp, Gene Hunt) and some surprisingly good (Boyz Noize), followed by a week in the middle of a seaside desert. Relaxation and an abandonment of The Truth were a nice break for a fortnight, even if I did get twitchy without my laptop a couple of times on the beach.

Rambling aside, on with the collected things of interest I have found since my return to civilisation and a high speed Internet connection;
I think being a DJ I got quite bored of kick drum-based music. It’s a real struggle for me to find stuff I actually want to play, but luckily I’ve got better and the people who come to my shows have gone along with me and I don’t have to play too much stuff that’s very kick-drummy or straight. DJing’s still quite fun because people are dancing along to kraut records now which makes me really happy.

I really didn’t want to make a dance album. I don’t really see the point in them. I always had this feeling like, ‘Why do I need a kick drum? I’m in my house.’ All the kick drums are at the back of the mix in everything. I don’t know if I can ever go back to putting kick drums in everything.
“There’s so much imbued meaning in production choices and I think in dance music people are quite unaware of that.”
It’s quite a reaction against lots of the things I was exposed to in the dance music world. Everything’s so straight and so tight, and there’s this an arms race of personal weakness on the part of DJs and producers, like ‘If I make it 2dB more L3 on the master chain it’s going to be even louder and punchier. If I leave only a kick drum and an off-beat bass sound that’s going to be really loud…’ That’s like a race to the bottom. There’s so much imbued meaning in production choices and I think in dance music people are quite unaware of that, whereas with rock music you can produce it like Ariel Pink or you can produce it like Travis and people are aware of the meaning of that. There’s a continuum and where you put yourself on that determines what kind of band you are. Loads of people in dance music think that even though they’re not making Guetta-house they can use the same production techniques as Guetta and it’s still OK. To me that’s like… functional, spray-tan music.

The meaning in that became really offensive, so I just wanted to do the exact opposite: make all the timing loose and the production soft and woolly and not sharp and tight. It’s still loud and intense and I’m still making an effort when I mix things down to make them sound good, but not that kind of good.
Taken from here


10 min beat videos from Addison Groove and Artifact
Daedulus studio tour...TBH Daedulus is a fucking dude even with his overt hipster stylings, big fan of his stuff and general attitude.

Great article from No Dough Music on analogue musings - Am I Analogue?

Interview with the guy behind the MPC on swing/timing - Roger Linn On Swing, Groove & The Magic Of The MPC’s Timing

Recommend this podcast from Marcel Fengler;

Tracklisting

01 Peter Van Hoesen "Attribute 39 (Donato Dozzy Remix)" (Time2Express)
02 Rolando "Filthy" (Ostgut Ton)
03 Stefan Vincent "Conflate Four" (Balans)
04 Architectural "Looking Ahead" (Semantica)
05 Tobias "Classics" (Naiif)
06 Freddi Fresh & Tim Taylor "Butterfingers" (V5)
07 Anthony "Shake" Shakir "Sonar" (Peacefrog)
08 Benjamin Damage "Delirium Tremens" (50Weapons)
09 Marc Romboy & Ken Ishii "Susei (ROD Remix One)" (Systematic)
10 Floorplan "Eclipse" (M‐Plant)
11 Clouds "The Rights of Artificial Life Form" (Turbo)
12 Marcel Fengler "King of Psi" (Ostgut Ton)
13 Unbalance "Rhythm Slave (Steffi Remix)" (Rebalance)
14 Marcel Fengler "Trespass" (Ostgut Ton)
15 Terrence Dixon "Tranquility" (Nice & Nasty)
16 John Heckle "So Far" (Mathematics)
17 Pan Sonic "Pan Finale" (Blast First Petite)

Download

Some proper gearlust with Jon Hopkins - Jon Hopkins Studio Tours
ImageImage


More to come, once the sharks have started swimming again. Reinforced interest in my battery powered portable studio after a moment of woah sat on a hill overlooking the ocean with rattlesnake skins at my feet. Good wraps too, turkey, pepper & feta are the way to go for portable nourishment. Especially handy if you're worried about nutrition whilst a long way from town.

Brothulhu
Posts: 991
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:09 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Just some random things I've stumbled on whilst catching

Post by Brothulhu » Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:57 am

wub wrote:Good wraps too, turkey, pepper & feta are the way to go for portable nourishment.
That sounds pretty damn tasty

I love those 10 minute beat videos and that James Holden interview is good stuff, cheers Wub
Soundcloud
Comfi wrote:I have done nothing more than made shitty dungeon and for that I apologise.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Mon Aug 12, 2013 11:15 am

http://darkartmasters.tumblr.com/post/5 ... dom-roland
ARTIST SPOTLIGHT: DOM & ROLAND

When push comes to shove, you’ve just gotta respect those that paved the way for music we have today. Kids truly do have it easy now in comparison…easily obtained software, running full studios on a laptop with a pair of speakers. Back in the day, we had to go into debt to pick up a few pieces of equipment and get started. There was no social media, no mp3s…the internet was barely a thing yet! People were selling vinyl out of their trunks and pleading with stores and distributors to pick up their release so it could be heard.

A lot of music that was made during this time is still revered as some of the best ever made and the source of inspiration for a lot of your favorite new artists’ careers. It’s truly amazing to think of the things that were done in Drum & Bass studios in the 90’s with a simple MIDI setup, sampler and a desk. These artists were true audio visionaries pushing boundaries in music. Ask any of the top Dubstep artists what they listened to growing up and they will say Drum & Bass. It’s undisputedly the foundation for what “Bass Music” is today.

One individual who has been there since day one, through thick and thin, consistently releasing some of the most deep, dark and mind-bending Jungle/Drum & Bass is Dominic Angas. Building his foundation as a Moving Shadow and No U-Turn artist in the 90’s, Dom is as legit as they come.

Knowing that Dom is almost as much of an audio freak as me, I knew he’d be up for a little studio interview. So we present the first installment of a new series: Artist Spotlight featuring the one and only Dom & Roland.

Image

You’ve been in the game for a long time, how old were you when you signed your first tune?

Wax Musical came out in 1994 on Saigon Recordings, which was an offshoot of No U-Turn. I was 19 at the time.

A lot has changed since those days, what are some of significant changes you’ve seen over the span of your career?

Not everyone had access back then to make and release a record because of the initial outlay on buying equipment or renting studio time. I got a loan from the bank to buy the equipment I needed…£5000 i think it was. I bought a Roland sampler, a CD-Rom drive, an Atari 1040 with Midex running Cubase, a Yamaha SPX-990 effects unit and a portable Sony DAT to record my masters with. To eq or add effects to something, I had to run the sound out of the onboard sampler output eq and resample it back in through an input using a cable. It sounds dated now, but it worked. There was a lot more variety in the tone of the sound as everyone had different equipment.

Also back then we used to listen to music only on vinyl and cassettes. If you owned a track then most likely you had actually paid for it. The internet was not widely used.

I think young peoples attitudes have changed too. Back then it was cool to like something no one else had heard of. I was excited to hang out down the record shop and spend my money on something not everyone else had. It made me really feel part of the scene. Especially if the guy in the record shop slipped you a white label promo from under the counter.

Nowadays, without stating the obvious differences in format, things have come full circle. Apparently, according to a researched article i read, it’s much cooler to like the same artists your friends like. Being avant-garde in your musical taste gets you labelled as weird or eccentric. Which just sounds dumb to me, but then i’m 38 now, which in young person speak is f***ing ancient.

Was it hard to say goodbye to Roland? It definitely had a signature sound to it.

Not really…I never said goodbye. He still sits in my rack looking content among all the newer equipment surrounding him. I actually turned him on the other day by twisting his little power knob. I used him on my last album on the track “Terminate” which i wrote only using my desk, hardware effects and outboard samplers.

Your tracks always sound larger than life, truly epic with cinematic soundscapes. What inspires you? Movies…Music…Life?

Movies, life, other peoples music, the usual things. I grew up playing classical music, and with both my parents being opera singers, i suppose I inherited a love of all things epic…I can’t sit through an opera without getting antsy or falling asleep though. I was always a sci-fi aficianado too which helps elongate the mind.

Do you ever make music other than Drum & Bass?

I have dabbled, but never released anything myself. That may change soon. I have mixed Rock tunes and other electronica for people though.

You seem to stay on the cutting edge of production, always trying out new plugins and gear. What are some game changers that you’ve found recently?

Valhalla Ubermod sounds good on just about anything….It’s almost as good as my hardware Eventide. The flanged delays are excellent. A lot of the Airwindows plugins are also good. I like their Drive and Desk plugins a lot. My DAW, Reaper, is a game changer. The Slate Digital stuff is good too, although his bullshit way of marketing it is almost enough to make me not want to use it.

And what are some of the mainstays that you’ve stuck with for a long time?


I’m a long time DMG Audio supporter, I’ve known Dave since he worked at Focusrite when i beta tested the Liquid Channel. I’ve been involved with ideas and testing since he started the company. All his plug ins are excellent and coded in the most modern and refined way possible. I’ve been messing with Pitchfunk a lot recently, a current favorite. I’ve been a Soundtoys user and tester for a long time too, Echoboy is pretty much on every track i make somewhere. The clipping on Filterfreak gets a lot of use too. Acustica Nebula and it’s sampled eqs is also a very underated plugin that i’ve used for a long time.

You were on the beta testing team for DMG Audio’s Equilibrium. What were some of the ideas that you contributed to the development of that eq?

Band linking and grouping, The Flat-top shape, right-clicking the A/B/H button to flick through snapshots. Theres quite a few! There’s a group of us, we all bounce ideas of each other and come up with the best way of implementing things for all the plugins.

Your productions seem to rely a lot on harmonics and distortion, what are some techniques you use to get that dirty Dom & Roland sound?

I basically just run things really hot into plugins or hardware until it sounds too shitty, then back off a bit…simples. I may put an eq first as its a good way of controlling what frequencies saturate first. Hardware almost always sounds better especially when played loud due to the large amounts of aliasing present when you use anything digital to distort.

Image

How did you find the transition from analog to digital?

Easy…I did it quite early on. So i had a good understanding on what each was good for. I learned how to use Logic when i had my studio at Moving Shadow HQ, it was handy having Rob Playford there to bug with my questions. I think i was on Logic 3 back then. Audio instruments didn’t even exist back then, Logic was like a glorified tape machine.

Analog and digital both have their perks, would you agree?

Yes, anything with distortion involved including compression, analog generally sounds better. But rules are there to be broken.

You were a Logic user for ages and recently turned to another DAW. It’s difficult leaving something that’s so comfortable. What provoked that change?

As i now understand a great deal about how audio is implemented…I just couldn’t keep using Logic. A lot of its code and the way it uses it is not up to modern standards. There are several things i couldn’t deal with any longer. Here’s a few…

Can’t import or bounce anything at the resolution your DAW is working at (32bit float).

Put something on a bar loop and it’s actually a bar loop plus a little bit extra time, whichever cycle setting you use. Useless for fine tuning a groove.

You have to press stop and start to hear any fade changes you’ve made.
They removed some very useful things from the Audiosuite menu like sample rate convert.

I moved to Reaper as i could keep all my Logic key commands and most importantly the way I zoom in and out using the marquee tool…it’s very straightforward and easy to learn and set up. I keep coming across new things i can do. It sounds great too, much cleaner and more open than Logic. In terms of sonics, I’d say Pro Tools, Cubase, Reaper and Studio One sound the best, then Logic, then Ableton Live at the bottom. Along with you and other people we did very boring blind tests to come up with this result.

Right now using Reaper, my up and down keys pitch my audio regions up and down in cents using realtime sample rate conversion (like a sampler) so for most simple tasks i don’t even need to use a sampler. The waveform updates too which makes it easier to see whats going on.

I was amazed that none of these essential things were addressed when Logic X came out. I’m very happy now i made the switch a couple of years ago.

Tell me about Reaper macros.

One i set up recently for beats does this: find all transients, split at transients, quantize to grid setting, force legato, apply crossfades one millisecond before transients…like Pro Tools’ Beat Detective.

You have an editor where you can string long lists of commands together and then assign the whole lot to one key. It’s most excellent.

Any other tips or tricks that you’d like to divulge?

When eq’ing things make sure you level match the eq’d and bypassed version…your brain loves playing tricks on you. Louder for some reason always sounds better.

As far as I know, you’re not a big compression user for the most part, is this true?

I like compression for some things like bass, I’d just rather not use it unless i need to. I like to distort or edit to limit my dynamic range manually, it’s more precise.

Image

You put a lot of focus on moving notes back and forth finding the perfect groove. You also have been known to take a groove from a breakbeat and apply it to another, un-quantized. A lot of producers making music for DJ’s can’t fathom the thought of being off the grid.

It’s all in the groove as they say. People often laugh at me for pulling out the sample delay plugin and delaying a hihat by 3 samples, but i have proved enough times that i can hear and feel it. Even drummers that play to a click often play their snares late or rush their kicks…it’s the difference between an average drummer and a great one. It’s no less important for electronic music. Remember we are talking about miniscule amounts here. But it’s enough to feel the difference especially in the context of a track.

You’re responsible for creating one of the most sampled breaks in Drum & Bass history, the “Tramen.” It involved layering several 70’s breaks together to create a new break. How do you feel about layering breaks these days?

I made the Tramen from a few well known old breakbeats, Three of them layered together cut to the same groove. They were all originally off vinyl, I then eq’d them all to do a different task within the beat…break 1: hats bite, break 2: ride groove and sheen, break 3: weight and roll. I still layer breaks if i need to, but would much rather find one that has all the elements i need in it, that way i don’t have to have my brain done in by working out the phase relationship between them as I layer three kicks or snares on top of each other. The three breaks were then squashed/distorted into one by driving the input gains on my analog desk (very hard to get right in digital) then resampled and chopped up again.

So Trace came round to use me as an engineer for a few tracks and convinced me he should use it (laughs). We ended up doing a few tracks together that all turned out to be classics. Sonar and Mutant Jazz Revisited were the first. One of the tracks I left the break clean on its own for a bar, thats where everyone else nicked it from. Everyone from Ray Keith to Bad Company and Optical have based whole tunes around it since. It used to piss me off, but now i suppose i feel honored.

After all this time, you’ve now done your first record for Metalheadz. How was it working on the Jah Remix for Goldie?

After all this time….(laughs). Because my name wasn’t on Ed Rush’s Skylab EP, no one knew i mixed and made it with him back in the 90’s.

Jah was a hard one to do. It took about a year on and off to get it right. I wanted to keep the vibe of the original but update it. It didn’t help that i had none of the samples and had to make most of them from scratch. It was such a good tune i wanted to get it right. Goldie knew i was doing a remix for him but i wouldn’t tell him which one it was. He was blown away once I finally played it to him.

What’s next for DRP?

A single from us is next (Dom & Hive - DMT). An album of DRP back catalogue remixes from my favorite artists in the scene, a few singles from new DRP artists Armando and Xanadu with albums to follow and a few singles from me.

I have a lot of new solo music made too, i just haven’t had the time to release it, i may release some of it on other labels.

Image

https://twitter.com/domandroland

https://www.facebook.com/domandroland

http://www.domandroland.com

photos: http://www.chelonewolfphotography.com

User avatar
travis_baker
Posts: 851
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by travis_baker » Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:40 pm

thanks wub....it blows my mind how much these oldschool guys go threw to make a tune, 1 year on and off!!?? :o
i should be taking my music much more seriously!

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by Genevieve » Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:42 pm

Dom's one of my top influences. I owe a lot to the guy but... this is one of the first interviews I read where doesn't come across as a bit of a knob >.>
Image

namsayin

:'0

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:43 pm

Genevieve wrote:Dom's one of my top influences. I owe a lot to the guy but... this is one of the first interviews I read where doesn't come across as a bit of a knob >.>
Yeah the DoA Q&A in particular he comes across as a bit shitty to DnB 'fans' at times.

What other interviews have you read/have links for?

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:42 am

Before I lost it again;

Fitting Outboard into a rack

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:52 am

http://www.xlr8r.com/gear/2013/08/studio-blondes
Image

In the Studio: Blondes
With the release of its second full-length album, Swisher, earlier this month via RVNG, New York duo Blondes (a.k.a. Sam Haar and Zach Steinman) has further boosted its reputation as an outfit capable of crafting uniquely dense and enveloping house tracks. With an army of hardware at its disposal, the pair has built up a signature sound that pulls together an almost incalculable number of wandering synth tones alongside lush layers of FX processing, resulting in productions that are engrossingly vast and almost limitless in their sonic width. Given that, XLR8R was curious to see how exactly Blondes puts its tunes together, so we visited the duo's modest Williamsburg studio to chat about turning knobs, signal flow, and recording live jams: of course, we also took a peek at the pair's keenly picked synth collection.

Image
Image

XLR8R: How long have you guys had your studio in this space?

Zach Steinman: About a year and a half.

Sam Haar: We used to have a spot in what was basically an art studio, which didn't sound as good, but was nicer in a way—there was a window. But then other artists would also be in the studio, and there was no sound separation.

ZS: We'd get a little self-conscious, and we weren't allowed to make as much sound as we wanted. You could hear someone in the other room painting or coughing, while we'd just be listening to a loop forever. [Laughs]

SH: It's so hard to find a place to in New York where you can play loud at any time of day, so we moved to one of these little shitty cave rooms in this complex now, but we have 24-hour access and license to make noise.

A lot of your studio is built around hardware. Did you guys start producing on hardware, or did you move in that direction after having produced for a while?

SH: I started making electronic music on hardware a long time ago, probably around 1998. So, some of the pieces of hardware I have are actually leftover from collecting over the years, and then some were bought at moments where I had some money and just felt I needed some more gear. But I was also a laptop musician for a little while, so I've gone back and forth.

ZS: I came to hardware after playing instruments for a while. I had steadily gotten more into electronic music, and after college I started slowly building my collection of hardware pieces.

Image

And how do you guys usually end up acquiring those pieces? Do you have any shops you go to, or are you more eBay/Craigslist people?

SH: Some of it is from eBay, some of it is from Sweetwater—we do buy stuff new. Getting nice vintage stuff is great too, but there's a really nice assurance in having new gear. And a lot of our stuff is MIDI'd up too, so that's usually easier with newer gear.

Is most of your gear MIDI-synced together, or are there pieces like, say, the Juno-6 that you don't use MIDI with?


SH: Yeah, you actually have to use a CV converter with that.

ZS: But we really don't sync the Juno. It's definitely more fun to let [that keyboard] run free. [Laughs]

But for the most part, all of the pieces that can be MIDI synced together are?

SH: Yeah, definitely. And it's the same when we play live. There isn't that much of a difference between our studio set-up and our live set-up actually.

Are you ever worried that you're going to damage some of your studio pieces by touring with it?

SH: All the time. [Laughs]

ZS: Luckily we don't bring our mixers with us on tour, because aside from being really hard to lug around, they are also really easy to break.

Image
Image

Are there any particular pieces of hardware that are the staples of the sound on your new record, or did you find yourselves jumping around a lot?

SH: We pretty much used all the synths all the time.

ZS: Yeah, the Juno was used for a lot of the arpeggiations, and just to generate noise. I'd run the Juno into the Doepfer Dark Energy [synthesizer] a lot, and use that as a filter. I'd usually run the MFB Drum Computer through the Doepfer as well, so there's a lot of that on the record. The MFB bass drum is all over the album; it has a nice 808-style bass drum.

SH: I used the Prophet-8 and this old digital Novation synth a lot on the album, usually synced up together for arpeggiators, chords, and stuff. When they are synced up, you can get three different layers playing the same line at once.

ZS: We ended up sampling the [Korg] M1 a lot on the record. We'd sample into the [Elektron] Octarack and the MPC even. On [the album track] "Elise," the sitar sound is the M1, and the organ bassline sound.

SH: The M1 has those classic, early-'90s sounds on it.

And is that a synth leftover from your early days of producing?

SH: Randomly, my dad's friend had it and said, "Hey, I'd think you'd like this." Of course, I was like, "Yeah, totally!" I've heard some of those classic Depeche Mode choir sounds came from the M1, but—honestly—when I play around on it, all I can think of is the X-Files soundtrack—it all sounds like it was made on the M1. [Laughs]

Image
Image

How does your signal flow work then? Do all the synths hit the mixer and then the mixer feeds the audio into the computer to get recorded?

SH: When we record, we play [the songs] live, and everything goes through the mixers—we each have our own mixer that we use. The mixers are kind of the centerpoint of our set-up. Both of us have all the synths coming into the mixer, and the FXs and pedals on FX sends, and I'll also have the MPC broken out into lots of different channels and going directly to the mixer. It's kind of the same way that dub producers used to do it in a way, using the mixer to route the signals live and really doing a lot of the performance on the mixer. So when we track, we just take direct out from channel and just multitrack [record] that way.

And all of the songs on Swisher are live performances that were then recorded?

SH: Yeah, all of them are. We'd track live takes—something like 20 channels at a time. On this record, we definitely went back and mixed and edited a lot too.

ZS: We also took some live takes and then chopped those back up and put them into our samplers to then make something new out of that; kind of different iterations of those jams.

SH: Yeah, exactly. That's how we usually work—we play with all our channels running, multitrack that, and then work from there.

Image

It sounds like you each have your own stations and instruments that you control in the songs?

SH: Definitely, we each have our side of the table. Mine is on the right, mainly the MPC and the Prophet-8, and Zach is the left, with the Juno and the Octatrack.

Where do most of your drum sounds come from? You had mentioned the MFB Drum Computer earlier, but are the MPC and the Octatrack also contributing drum sounds as well?

ZS: It's all three really. There are a lot of samples in the Octatrack and MPC, and then the MFB is used with those as well.

So are you guys just always recording your jams and filling up hard drives until you get something you like?

ZS: Not as much as we should probably. We should be tracking more, but we kind of have to get into the mindset of doing that sometimes.

SH: Usually, we'll start out just generating loops that we like and layers that we can use, and then we start jamming with those. First, you have to get together the building blocks and the seed of the idea, and then you can start jamming off of that.

ZS: A lot of times, each of us will work on our own to start the ideas, and then we'll bring them together and build them together.

Image
Image

During these jams, how much of what you're doing is triggering samples and such as opposed to you actually playing a keyboard line or tapping out a drum part on the fly?

SH: There are samples, but there are actually more sequences that we bring in and out as well as keyboard playing and a lot of knob turning, filtering, and manipulating the FX sends.

And where do the return of the FXs go? Back into the board on a return channel?

SH: They usually come back on a normal channel on the mixer. That's part of the fun of it—you can create more complex FX routing depending on what you want to do.

ZS: Yeah, you can send something to the delay, and then from the mixer put that delay back through something else—it makes it really easy to make a chain.

Image
Image

How long did it take you two to become comfortable with a set-up like that? Had you used professional recording equipment before or had any training?

ZS: It's definitely taken a while.

SH: Yeah, when we first started playing, it was much more simple. Then we slowly started adding more gear, and as we got more comfortable, we continued expanding. There was a learning curve, but it's something we've gotten better at by playing over the past five years.

ZS: One of the harder parts of playing that way is getting a good mix and not letting levels rise too high, just because there are so many things to think about.

SH: It can definitely be a sort of acrobatic balancing act at times. [Laughs]

But that's part of the fun too, right?

SH: Absolutely. And the sort of flexibility it allows for is really part of the fun because when you are playing live, you'll often come up with an entirely new thing that you've never done before. Even a whole new network of routing, like, "Oh, I never ran that thing through that pedal." It can be really dynamic and open to improvisation.

Image

Are those tricks things you remember just from doing it so often, or do you guys ever write down notes or anything like that?

SH: Definitely the latter. When you do it enough, you sort of build up a repertoire of tricks in your bag.

ZS: Usually, you remember what worked. If you're playing live, you especially need to remember.

How many of these jams would you say get recorded but then don't end up on a record?

ZS: Making this LP, we had a few. But that kind of playing is really generative in a different way than usual. So when you're tracking, it's because you realize you've got something.

SH: And you have more predetermined sequences that you're working with as well.

So you kind of have a sketch in your head before you start recording?

SH: Not exactly. We'll maybe have a sketch of what we're using, but not where we will end up going with it.

Is there ever a discussion before you start recording where you lay out guidelines, or is it more just left to improvisation?

SH: Sometimes we do, but mostly it comes from working on the track before recording it.

ZS: But tracks like "Eon" were totally improvised, totally in the moment. It definitely varies. There are times when we'll have ran something and one of us will say, "Oh, I liked when you did that after I did this," and then we'll try to do that again.

Image
Image

In the interview that accompanied your recent Resident Advisor mix, you said, "We worked on all tracks simultaneously and then the album slowly revealed itself."

SH: Well, we had ideas for a bunch of different tracks, and we were working on them all at the same time.

ZS: Yeah, we finished them all on the same day, actually. But we'd come to a new place with a certain track, and then move on to a different track until we got that to a new place, and that's how the album slowly revealed itself.

SH: We worked on all the sequences, loops, and content for all of the tracks first, then we tracked everything, and then we started editing everything. We'd sort of be bouncing back and forth between every track, but they'd all be in the same part of the process.

ZS: We even had a color-coding system for the tracks as we were working—red status was "not very far along," blue status was "getting there and ready to be mixed" and then green status was "good to go." [Laughs]

And when you say you "finished" all the songs in the same day, do you mean that each track came to a conclusion on the same day, not that you recorded, edited, and mixed the album all in one day?

SH: No, no. We were editing and mixing them all at the same time, so the day we started saying, "Oh this track was done," we were able to do that with all of the album. We were actually working on deadline, so it kind of had to be that way.

Image

How does your mixdown process work? Is there a lot of EQing and compression that you are doing in the computer?

SH: Well, we track into Logic, and then we did a combination of mixing in the box and then sending stuff to outboard gear. It was fun to do that, summing some tracks using outboard gear, and then deciding to sum the other elements in the computer. I think summing tracks in the box or in outboard gear sounds really different, so we could play with that. You can level things out really well in the gear, but keep it more three-dimensional in Logic. The EQs and compression we did on the computer is pretty transparent; definitely more scientific, getting rid of specific frequencies and such. When we use the EQs on the mixers, it's much more for general shaping, like we want the highs to come out a bit to add a little bit more mid-range. On tracks like "Andrew," which got pretty dense, there was a lot more scientific, in-the-box EQ going on.

And when you say you were summing stuff to outboard gear, you mean that you were sending stems out to hardware compressors and such?

SH: Yeah, we'd maybe make a group of synths, like eight channels or something, and sum it down to two tracks and have fun with it, like run it through this crappy little mixer box we had and some parallel compression and then bring it all back in.

ZS: Just grouping sounds and running them through the same FX channel or process really colors the sound in a new way.

SH: It sort of solidifies them into a new texture.

Image
Image

And were you guys tweaking knobs and stuff on these FXs while you were recording them back in, similarly to when you were playing the tracks live?

ZS: Yeah, we sometimes would get really performative with that sort of stuff, almost like it was an overdub.

SH: We might think a clap was a little static or something and decide to play with a flanger effect or something while we were mixing it.

But you don't do a lot of automation within Logic?

SH: Not really. Sometimes we'll automate levels, but for the most part, if it's not part of the scientific or transparent stuff that we want, we usually won't automate on the computer.

And how long does it usually take you to mix a song?

SH: A few days, but we'd sort of go back and forth between editing and mixing as we were going. Those processes kind of inform each other. But once we're in the computer, we really only try to use content that we tracked in, because once you're in there, you can work on it forever. It's nice to give yourself limitations like that, it helps just get the job done.

Image
Image

Do you guys make any attempt to build an atmosphere in your studio? You have some plants and pictures and such, but is having the room "right" something that affects how you work?

ZS: Well, I think we could make most anyplace work, but it is just nice to have plants around, to feel comfortable.

SH: There aren't any windows in here, so the plants are just there to help make it not feel like you are in a box or a cave, and they improve the air quality a lot too.

ZS: Also, we have a grow light that is set to a timer, so you know whether it's nighttime or daytime.

SH: It just helps us not feel crazy. [Laughs]
:U:

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:58 am

Two-Part Interview with Holly Herndon
Burgeoning video production studio Chromavision has just completed its latest piece, a two-part interview with San Francisco techno experimentalist Holly Herndon. Throughout the two impeccable-looking videos (shot while driving through the Mission District and inside Craig Baldwin's film archive at Artists' Televison Access on Valencia St.), the producer discusses topics ranging from her background with singing in church to how her relationship with car ownership has changed over the years. In addition to the interview, Aria Rostami, an SF artist who conducted the Q&A with Herndon, has shared an accompanying mix which is said to be "inspired by Holly and her work." Chromavision's mini-doc and Rostami's mix can both be found below.


Soundcloud


Fucking love Holly's stuff, very weird techno. Seeing her in November at Club2Club festival in Turin :h:

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:18 pm

Cool shit you need to listen to
Gorgon Grime
Soundcloud
**Edition of 100 with fold-out collage artwork** 'Gorgon Grime' is a ruff & ready 40 minute cassette bricolage of classic moments from ten years of grime. Culled from radio sets, mixtapes, and (we're guessing) youtube, it distills the mercurial, bristling energy of the UK's gulliest MCs and producers in a way few other formats could, presenting a non-stop flow of incendiary, abstract bars and iconic, kinetic riddims strafed with FM noise and a deft lick of FX, all locked in by that timeless ferric quality. Much like Rollo Jackson's 'Tape Crackers' DVD or even Lee Gamble's upcoming 'Diversions 1994-1996' it's a passionate, canny, and kaleidoscopic memorial to a specific era of UK sound culture and well recommended to any self-respecting 'nuum-o-nauts.
Lee Gamble - Diversions 1994-1996
According to the press release, the two lengthy tracks that make up Diversions 1994-1996 were assembled solely using sounds sourced from Lee Gamble's collection of jungle cassette mixtapes. Gamble, a jungle enthusiast in his teenage years, here revisits a past love with the intention to "extract, expand upon and convey particular qualities emblematic of the original music."

Gamble's previous releases for the likes of London label Entr'acte have tended to foreground their intensely synthetic qualities, but Diversions, released on the PAN imprint, sees the producer take a less involved approach, amplifying the hazy grain of his source materials but rarely obscuring their basic sonic properties. At points, something like a groove is hinted at—and there is a brief period of breakbeat propulsion, near the end of side B—but for the most part this is static music: a succession of starkly beautiful moments, each one suspended in space for a moment and then abruptly supplanted by the next. Diversions is perhaps best viewed as an impressionistic rendering of the experiences of jungle culture in its heyday: its bleak, post-industrial landscapes, the heady disorientation of its highs and the dead-eyed paranoia of its lows, stitched together into a surreal, dream-like narrative.

Reformed junglists may register certain moments as clarion calls from a halcyon past: Side A opens with a diva "ooh" stretched out into penumbral infinity and closes with a swatch of brooding sci-fi paranoia; elsewhere, clouds of airy, timorously beautiful pads float over brooding 808 thuds. Near the middle of side B, a brief glimmer of euphoria is expelled by a succession of throbbing, industrial pulses. Still, Gamble's approach to his source material is satisfyingly oblique. Search for a narrative logic in Diversions and you won't find it; but as an evocation of a time and place—or rather one man's memories of it—it is both sinister and poignant in equal measure.

Image

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by Genevieve » Thu Aug 15, 2013 2:40 pm

wub wrote:
Genevieve wrote:Dom's one of my top influences. I owe a lot to the guy but... this is one of the first interviews I read where doesn't come across as a bit of a knob >.>
Yeah the DoA Q&A in particular he comes across as a bit shitty to DnB 'fans' at times.

What other interviews have you read/have links for?
Yeah, he really seems to be kind of in love with himself tbh.

Can't really remember the specific interview but I'll post it when I do.

He's got some good production advice anyway.
Image

namsayin

:'0

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:29 pm


wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Thinking out loud...

Post by wub » Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:42 am

http://breaksmag.com/issue-4/deep-house ... r-v-necks/

Image
How smug I feel to be a European clubber, sneering across the Atlantic. To say: “You’re doing it wrong,” to the bikini-clad teens, as they wiggle glowsticks at midday like runway marshals in a Carry On… film. To critique the dance moves of vest-wearing bros (albeit from a distance) as they punch the air, and each other, in time to endless crescendos of distorted midrange masquerading as bass. To lament “subtlety” and “vibe”, and “the forgotten art of the crate-digger”, in the face of Electric Daisy Carnival’s apparent music policy of having every DJ play from a single iTunes playlist, one seemingly pieced together using only the Beatport top 10 and CDs bought in service stations with titles like “Gurntastic Bass Wobs 17″.

Because while our ignorant colonial cousins are asking “Where’s Molly?”, and supporting a music economy where Deadmau5 gets paid $450,000 a show to do a job he openly despises, we’re dancing to the early hours, in fields where house’s original mantras of love and openness are embodied in the loose-limbed sound of DJs indebted to the US’s greatest musical exports – Larry Levan, Derrick May, Frankie Knuckles – and where every colour, creed and orientation comes together, as one love under a groove.

Here we do things properly. Here, you’d never find homogenous crowds, all white, all 20-something, the men wearing the same River Island shirt with plunging necklines that display, glinting against tribal tattoos, a silver spoon on a necklace, and the women parading in a uniform of arse-bearing hot pants, flashing sideboob and pouting like an erotic army dreamt up by a sweaty-palmed teenager in the throes of his vinegar strokes. Our clubbers are experienced, and wouldn’t huff a balloon of laughing gas from a rat-tailed man outside a pub at 1pm, then bang a gram of ketamine and spend the first four hours of a festival trying not to fall into the future, the next four wondering where their friends are and whether that piece of broken glass in their shoeless foot is likely to shatter. And we certainly wouldn’t soundtrack it with the unremitting rhythm of cookie-cutter tech-house, 12 hours of the same insipid kick-hat-snare, an exposure to tedious repetition that even the jailer of a Japanese prisoner of war camp would think was pushing things just a little far.

Oh, wait…

When did this happen? There used to be a system. We’d stay in our grimy warehouses, our sticky-floored pubs, our grubby house parties, where we’d dance with our hoods up and smoke soap bar and guzzle two-quid pills to broken rhythms, records older than we were that you didn’t know what speed to play it at. And they’d go to clubs called Miss Moneypenny’s, or Angel Vibez, and snort coke off each other while the Trophy Twins played the same six tracks all night, until everyone had sex in a Jacuzzi with Callum Best. It was a system that worked.

Muscles, heels and pneumatic breasts have no place in nightclubs. This is what happens when newspapers print pictures of Kate Moss mincing around V Festival in Hunter wellies, or Harry Styles rocking up to Alibi or some Geordie student’s house to party with the plebs. Clubs should be populated by the emaciated, people whose cheap MDMA is cut with so much speed they don’t sleep Friday to Friday, and subsist solely on wind-blown food that gets caught in their beards. They aren’t places to smile, or show off, or meet people. They’re where you go to sweat out all the terrible parts of your life for a few, dark, loud hours. It’s hard to freak out to Omar S when you’re worried about bumping into a ‘roid rager who looks like a condom stuffed with walnuts, or of having your metatarsal shattered by a misplaced stiletto.

But there’s no point railing against the tech-house TOWIEs, whose DC10 nostalgia inspires them to whip off their vests and flex at the opening strains of “Hungry For Power” (the Jamie Jones remix, natch). Mock them as you may, this is their scene now. Disclosure are at the top of the charts, those guys at school who said “Rollin’ and Scratchin’” was “just fucking noise”, as they drowned you out with Nickelback, now have “Get Lucky” as their ringtone. You just wait until they stop skipping over Moroder’s monologue – then they’ll have the history down too. Dance music is no longer underground, no longer different. It’s like the mid-90s all over again, only with sing-a-long deep house filling the main floor at Oceana in place of endless spinbacks of “Firestarter”.

There’s only one answer. As we’ve been forced out of our niche by the invading hordes of the tanned and toned, we’ll have to take over a different burrow. Somewhere so unfashionable that no one would ever follow. Music that only makes sense in caves, or deep in the woods, or in an enormous Dutch aircraft hangar surrounded by stomping skinheads in camo trousers. Let us head to the warm embrace of gabber, my friends. After all, there’s no chance Nick Grimshaw’s going to play DJ Plague on the Breakfast Show anytime soon.

Is there?

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests