robotic wrote:at dubstepforum power's always been in the hands of a few, and granted, a bit of quality control is not a bad idea, but here it has on numerous occasions slipped into a semblance of tyranny. so wtf? is this place public or isn't it?
sapphic_beats wrote:there are 20,000 people on this forum, and a handful of mods/admins. this forum wouldn't be shit without the contributors, it would be a handful of mods/admins.
how nice to be reminded that at the end of the day, this forum is "OURS and not YOURS”.
bellybelle wrote:You say this is our forum. But if it were our forum, why were so many of our forum not even considered before this decision?
sapphic_beats wrote:i just want to see less circling of the wagons and more listening. does that make sense?
you don’t have to agree with my decisions, or understand my reasons, but you are very wrong when you say that I don’t listen what forum members say, and very funny when you call tyranny.
have you ever thought that idea of closing the forum is actually YOURS?
yes, members of this forum suggested to lock the forum (and even more than that). not me. or moderators.
i liked the idea, because I wanted to stop all this hate for 2 days, and i stand behind decisions i made.
maybe i was listening the wrong people, and maybe i did mistake, but telling me that i don't listen and that i am doing tyranny is ridiculous.
i am trying to listen all forum members, especially moderatos because I think they are among smartest and most experienced – that’s why I choosed them, but that doesn't mean i can do what everyone says, right? i have to weight, and do what i think is right. some will like it, some will hate it. it will always be like that. it has to.
unfortunately, i can't explain my decisions every time to convince everyone that what I did was right, simply because i don't have time to do it, and i know that leaves you space to be suspicious.
but why be suspicious? can't you just trust me? when did i cheat you?
i know it is a totally naive and idealistic thing to say, but it used to be like that for a first year here - and it worked just fine. i didn't ban anyone (except poor dubmugga), i didnt lock threads, i didnt lock forums, i didnt delete posts. not even one.
but now, when we are 20 000, unfortunately it cant be handled like that any more, because community this big can't be auto-controlled any more. and we have to lock thread, not because i enjoy it, but because i can't spend whole day explaining to someone why he is wrong and why something else is right thing to do. it would be ideal if i could - i agree, but i cant, i am sorry.
thats why we have to use policeman methods: locking threads, locking forums, banning ppl - and we will have to use it much more – now i realize that.
but since most of you who are complaining use dsf only as a resource of information anyway (because discussions are very poor here, right) so i am sure you will not mind if we lock beef and aggressive threads or delete only poisoned posts.
and all of you who will come to preach me about democracy, tyranny, bush and stuff like that….. save my time.
peace.
ivan