Post your unpopular opinions.

Sexual_Chocolate · Post by **Sexual_Chocolate** » Sun May 27, 2012 10:08 pm

that 'music' makes me want to cry

Shum · Post by **Shum** » Sun May 27, 2012 10:16 pm

kentnz wrote:
Molzie wrote:
rayman612 wrote:if u dress up like a sheep shepard can u get a house in new zealand for free???
If you're wearing jandles, stubbies, a black singlet and say "fuck'n eh bro" heaps you'll get your own complimentary farm

edit: league shorts are the new stubbies

wolf89 · Post by **wolf89** » Sun May 27, 2012 10:23 pm

Sonika wrote:This one's badass too

I like that whole album a lot

God this terrible..

sigbowls · Post by **sigbowls** » Sun May 27, 2012 10:57 pm

transvestites are not gay

P Daley · Post by **P Daley** » Mon May 28, 2012 12:00 am

signals wrote:transvestites are not gay

They're half gay.

BonerJams04 · Post by **BonerJams04** » Mon May 28, 2012 12:17 am

fractal · Post by **fractal** » Mon May 28, 2012 3:24 am

Molzie wrote:
rayman612 wrote:if u dress up like a sheep shepard can u get a house in new zealand for free???
If you're wearing jandles, stubbies, a black singlet and say "fuck'n eh bro" heaps you'll get your own complimentary farm

BASED · Post by **BASED** » Mon May 28, 2012 4:06 am

King Of the Hill is really funny

BASED · Post by **BASED** » Mon May 28, 2012 4:06 am

and Riff Raff has saved hip hop

wobbles · Post by **wobbles** » Mon May 28, 2012 4:18 am

i like riff raff a lot

P Daley · Post by **P Daley** » Mon May 28, 2012 4:42 am

Who doesn't like Riff Raff?

InternetSlaveMaster · Post by **InternetSlaveMaster** » Mon May 28, 2012 6:02 am

I think it's stupid when producers who are label owners put out major releases on other labels..

It's like owning a roofing business but having someone else fix your roof.

Shum · Post by **Shum** » Mon May 28, 2012 6:26 am

why do you say that? poor analogy imo.

Sexual_Chocolate · Post by **Sexual_Chocolate** » Mon May 28, 2012 6:28 am

InternetSlaveMaster wrote:I think it's stupid when producers who are label owners put out major releases on other labels..

It's like owning a roofing business but having someone else fix your roof.

ummm

its more like owning your own building company

but then you (personally) do cash jobs on the side

thatjsound · Post by **thatjsound** » Mon May 28, 2012 6:38 am

pikeymobile wrote:

for those that dont know

So glad someone linked this. Discipline is gold as well.
LSD and Untold is just...

InternetSlaveMaster · Post by **InternetSlaveMaster** » Mon May 28, 2012 6:42 am

Because your job is to promote and get these tunes heard. Giving your album to someone else to do this, from a business standpoint, makes it seem like you find yourself incapable of doing the job.

And yes, I understand that there are some opportunities it presents that can trickle down to your own label, etc., I'm not an idiot, just thought I'd post my unpopular opinion in the unpopular opinions thread, not the "straight talk record labels" thread ._.

And Nevalo, your analogy doesn't really work.. my analogy was that the roofer/business owner (producer/label owner) had another company (label) fix (distribute) his house (album).

Your analogy makes it seem like the roofer is fixing someone else's house, not someone else fixing his house.

I'm just saying from a business aspect it makes the person appear to not believe in their own brand. And notice I said "major releases", not like singles and stuff.

Just an observation guys, come on.

Shum · Post by **Shum** » Mon May 28, 2012 7:12 am

one posts in this thread with the expectation that you might get ripped to shreds lol.

Marcus · Post by **Marcus** » Mon May 28, 2012 7:13 am

Maybe the track they're releasing doesn't fit the style of their label.

InternetSlaveMaster · Post by **InternetSlaveMaster** » Mon May 28, 2012 7:23 am

Marcus wrote:Maybe the track they're releasing doesn't fit the style of their label.

Well that'd be one thing, but the specific incident that brought on my post is a midrange producer/label owner releasing their debut album on a different midrange label.

wub · Post by **wub** » Mon May 28, 2012 7:27 am

InternetSlaveMaster wrote:
Marcus wrote:Maybe the track they're releasing doesn't fit the style of their label.
Well that'd be one thing, but the specific incident that brought on my post is a midrange producer/label owner releasing their debut album on a different midrange label.

Kode9 owns Hyperdub, yet has releases on Tempa, Souljazz, Studio !K7, On-U Sound...does the same principle apply?

Post your unpopular opinions.

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Re: Post your unpopular opinions.. NSFW

Who is online