Dubstepforum.com

that 'music' makes me want to cry

kentnz wrote:

Molzie wrote:

rayman612 wrote:if u dress up like a sheep shepard can u get a house in new zealand for free???

If you're wearing jandles, stubbies, a black singlet and say "fuck'n eh bro" heaps you'll get your own complimentary farm

edit: league shorts are the new stubbies

Sonika wrote:This one's badass too



I like that whole album a lot

God this terrible..

transvestites are not gay

signals wrote:transvestites are not gay

They're half gay.

gay

Molzie wrote:

rayman612 wrote:if u dress up like a sheep shepard can u get a house in new zealand for free???

If you're wearing jandles, stubbies, a black singlet and say "fuck'n eh bro" heaps you'll get your own complimentary farm

King Of the Hill is really funny

and Riff Raff has saved hip hop

i like riff raff a lot

Who doesn't like Riff Raff?

I think it's stupid when producers who are label owners put out major releases on other labels..

It's like owning a roofing business but having someone else fix your roof.

why do you say that? poor analogy imo.

InternetSlaveMaster wrote:I think it's stupid when producers who are label owners put out major releases on other labels..

It's like owning a roofing business but having someone else fix your roof.

ummm

its more like owning your own building company

but then you (personally) do cash jobs on the side

pikeymobile wrote:

for those that dont know

So glad someone linked this. Discipline is gold as well.
LSD and Untold is just...

Because your job is to promote and get these tunes heard. Giving your album to someone else to do this, from a business standpoint, makes it seem like you find yourself incapable of doing the job.

And yes, I understand that there are some opportunities it presents that can trickle down to your own label, etc., I'm not an idiot, just thought I'd post my unpopular opinion in the unpopular opinions thread, not the "straight talk record labels" thread ._.

And Nevalo, your analogy doesn't really work.. my analogy was that the roofer/business owner (producer/label owner) had another company (label) fix (distribute) his house (album).

Your analogy makes it seem like the roofer is fixing someone else's house, not someone else fixing his house.

I'm just saying from a business aspect it makes the person appear to not believe in their own brand. And notice I said "major releases", not like singles and stuff.

Just an observation guys, come on.

one posts in this thread with the expectation that you might get ripped to shreds lol.

Maybe the track they're releasing doesn't fit the style of their label.

Marcus wrote:Maybe the track they're releasing doesn't fit the style of their label.

Well that'd be one thing, but the specific incident that brought on my post is a midrange producer/label owner releasing their debut album on a different midrange label.

InternetSlaveMaster wrote:

Marcus wrote:Maybe the track they're releasing doesn't fit the style of their label.

Well that'd be one thing, but the specific incident that brought on my post is a midrange producer/label owner releasing their debut album on a different midrange label.

Kode9 owns Hyperdub, yet has releases on Tempa, Souljazz, Studio !K7, On-U Sound...does the same principle apply?