Page 16 of 16
Re:
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:55 pm
by Forum
slothrop wrote:I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.
As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.
We can learn a lot from this, I think.

Re:
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:30 pm
by Nrjetik
slothrop wrote:I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.
As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.
We can learn a lot from this, I think.
And sadly 2-3 years later it's now called brostep.
What a weird world we live in.
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:58 pm
by Genevieve
I'm so glad I missed this.
Re: Re:
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:04 pm
by Lye_Form
Nrjetik wrote:slothrop wrote:I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.
As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.
We can learn a lot from this, I think.
And sadly 2-3 years later it's now called brostep.
What a weird world we live in.
oh wow.
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:11 pm
by Genevieve
Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:21 pm
by Lye_Form
Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.
D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.
Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:08 pm
by Lucifa
wtf is wrong with all these new school dubsteppers with their hats on backwards and their skateboards
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:37 pm
by fractal
everyone nose the cool kids rock rollerblades
fruitboots 4 lyf!
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:02 pm
by Raad
Lye Form wrote:Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.
D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.
Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Terrible analysis. You should feel bad because you're talking out of your ass

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:38 pm
by Lye_Form
Raad wrote:Lye Form wrote:Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.
D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.
Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Terrible analysis. You should feel bad because you're talking out of your ass

My point is that the focal aspect of genres gets taken further and further till its fucked.
Uk Garage was the most commercial and got cheesy as fuck
Jungle turned into D&B and D&b turned into a 170 mess
Majority of Dubstep turned into transformer noises
And you can suck a bag of dicks.

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:57 pm
by fractal
yes, but in jungle the focus was the edit in the drums, yet in DnB the drums mostly follow the exact same pattern ad infinity
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:16 pm
by _cheef_
I miss the days when 180 bpm clownstep was big in the edm game

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:17 pm
by Lye_Form
_cheef_ wrote:I miss the days when 180 bpm clownstep was big in the edm game

Those tru vibes couldn't last long tho brudda.
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:08 am
by test_recordings
fractal wrote:yes, but in jungle the focus was the edit in the drums, yet in DnB the drums mostly follow the exact same pattern ad infinity
I hate generic DnB for that reason, producers focus on everything BUT the drums

Ruins my night having to listen to the same shit over and over again! Waste of money..
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:16 am
by Raad
Lye Form wrote:Raad wrote:Lye Form wrote:Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.
D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.
Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Terrible analysis. You should feel bad because you're talking out of your ass

Jungle turned into D&B and D&b turned into a 170 mess
And you can suck a bag of dicks.

Still wrong and no.
Also I don't agree with your general point. The problem is not that a genre gets pushed "too far" within its philosophy/aesthetics (also, I'm pretty sure "filthy bass" wasn't the objective when dubstep started). The problems begin when artists that have no roots within the scene copy some really shallow aspects of the music and produce easy to digest shit and gain success. This is when producers and fans lose focus of what it was all about from the beginning.
But this is mainly a problem within genres that generally don't get mainstream attention I guess. (There's no point in doing an easy to digest version of something that is already popular.)
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:50 am
by Genevieve
The problem isn't the music, but the people that listen to it. By and large, most music is shit and most people listen to shit music.
There's this unwritten law of music that if a new genre comes out, the shittiest version of it will be picked up by the masses.
Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:15 pm
by mIrReN
I like titties!
in all colours and shapes

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 3:37 pm
by Lye_Form
mIrReN wrote:I like titties!
in all colours and shapes

+1