worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
what do you think about thomas costello and the dulce base? credible? i think it's very possibleparson wrote:the game's bigger than we know. who gives a shit about mkultra. have you looked at phil schneider's testimony? there's way bigger/weirder shit going on.
all the navy from nato or whoever that is supposed to be dealing with the pirate problem in that area have mainly congregated around a supposed stargate, along with navy from pretty much the entire worldferal witchchild wrote:Wait, wtf is going on in Yemen?
it was a post in a thread on david icke forum about drugs allowing people to see extra dimensional beingsahier wrote:hackman have you got a link for that methamphetamine story ?
lol just started reading about phil schneider and saw its about dulce, doh!hackman wrote:what do you think about thomas costello and the dulce base? credible? i think it's very possibleparson wrote:the game's bigger than we know. who gives a shit about mkultra. have you looked at phil schneider's testimony? there's way bigger/weirder shit going on.
aw cmon man 'most people grow out of it??'magma wrote:It's really not hard to find out about him, he's never far from the medias lips:alien pimp wrote:magma wrote:http://tickets.telegraph.co.uk/david-icke-tickets/alien pimp wrote:
censorship is big in US too, you can see the media reflecting much weirder and more marginal beliefs than parsons, but not his. let's not forget icke has quite a huge fanbase now, but only due to internet
Yeah, he's so alternative. You have to read the TELEGRAPH* to know about him!!
Next?
*for our American cousins - the Telegraph is the UK's 'poshest' mainstream paper. Aimed at the upper middle classes; lots of adverts for investments and luxury cars. Boris Johnson, the London Mayor, has a regular column.
do talk when you have a media coverage of his points of view and arguments, and that's any bit proportional with his fanbaseDavid Icke UK Tour
Now is your chance to catch your favourite rock and pop acts performing live on stage in the UK. See all the action right before your very eyes!
Whether you want to sing along to your favourite pop hits or rock out to your favourite guitar riffs, we have the right tickets for you. There is no better place to compare and buy rock and pop tickets for this event and many more!
So go on, check out thousands of David Icke tickets and other rock and pop tickets available to compare and buy now!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/ma ... es.weekend
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2 ... tures11.g2
Every curious teenager or 6th former has read this sort of conspiracy stuff for as long as I can remember. Most people grow out of it. In the 19th Century millions saw prisms as evidence of God; now we can explain prisms, so people look for other things to make mystical. It's all very predictable human behaviour.
I'm sure some very outlandish things may be true about the universe... but I'm only going to say "yes, I believe" to people who can demonstrate proof.
Since that was kinda almost directly after my post, I hope that it wasn't in response to what I wrote. Because I did not refer to anyone as a nutter in my post. I just asked for proof and that they treat others as they expect to be treated, ie if they want others to respect their beliefs, whether it's aliens, reptilians, science or religion, then they should allow others that same degree of respect in their beliefs. Which in this particular case is "mainstream" science.pistonsbeneath wrote:jesus some people really do have a nerve to call others nutters...
such a huge assumption to make about someone...just because you have your eyes closed doesn't mean people awake are nutters...
If you guys really can't see any of this stuff all around us then you cannot be even slightly open minded so don't even try saying you are
What Magma said. A certain subset of people do not believe in the conventional view. That is absolutely fine by me. I have absolutely no problem with that. Until, that is, I feel that I am practically being preached to about the TRUTH and am being insistently told that I am blind. Yet when I try to reason with said people and explain why my view is such, it gets shouted down and I'm told I'm being accusatory and blind. Why am I not allowed to hold on to my beliefs in CONVENTIONAL science when you expect to be allowed to expouse on your views? I never even get derogatory, abusive or condescending when presenting my viewpoints. Unlike some of the more hardcore zealots about the HIDDEN TRUTH.magma wrote:What got me involved was the repeated idea that people who don't believe are either stupid or haven't studied the information. We have. We just didn't buy it. I'm totally happy for all you guys if you do believe it and it improves your life (I feel similar to how I do towards those that find happiness in Buddhism or Christianity), honestly it's absolutely your business and not mine.... but if you post arrogance like this in public, you're going to get replies:
This particular quote however may suggest that:The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate. "
Noam Chomsky
Been watching this for the past 45 minutes. I think the guy is pretty unreliable, just comes across like a bit of a looney.parson wrote:
i kind of agree with youMotorway to Roswell wrote:Been watching this for the past 45 minutes. I think the guy is pretty unreliable, just comes across like a bit of a looney.parson wrote:
Alex Collier was believable, his video was interesting and I took him seriously. This guy however, I don't.
Yeah. He also pulls that shit about forgetting certain things which is pretty convenient for someone talking nonsense.hackman wrote:i kind of agree with youMotorway to Roswell wrote:Been watching this for the past 45 minutes. I think the guy is pretty unreliable, just comes across like a bit of a looney.parson wrote:
Alex Collier was believable, his video was interesting and I took him seriously. This guy however, I don't.
he's just recycling information that has been on the net for a while (for some reason i think he is a junkie lol)
im hoping his next interview will be much better
Pistonsbeneath wrote:it wasn't directed towards you no....
somebody said nutters were posting in the thread
I am more than willing to have a reasonable discussion until someone says i am mad and then i turn it around...
some people can debate this with respect and some people cannot....
Check my posts for evidence of this
Yeah that's why I was asking to be sure! Didn't think you were the dismissive sort!mmmMotorway to Roswell wrote:Psychically linking people with dolphins in order to prolong travel is a hilarious idea.
Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy?hackman wrote:mmmMotorway to Roswell wrote:Psychically linking people with dolphins in order to prolong travel is a hilarious idea.
apparently dolphins are extra terrestrial in origin, cant remember where i heard that, theres meant to be dolphin type aliens in the sea under the ice of a moon to neptune/uranus i think
i think that was from a channeling that dolores canon did
