Dubstepforum.com

jesslem wrote:Theism means belief in a god. Atheism must logically mean belief in no god.

No, it logically must mean lack of belief in a god, which is different.

Do you understand what the prefix "A" implies?
Asexual
Atypical
Asymmetric
Adynamic
Ahistorical

Need I go on?

Pedro Sánchez wrote:A common system that prevents us killing each other for space and resources, the nature of humans requires authority at some level, think about it.

Based on that, I'd confidently assert that no society is successful.

jesslem wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:

DiegoSapiens wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:anarchy is the dumbest political ideology on the planet - from the "sophisticated" university definitions, or the crusty punk definition.

no

Prove me wrong then. Explain why there has never been a successful anarchist society.

Give an example of any society that has ever been successful?

In fact, explain what criteria any society would need to meet to be considered successful.

Lets treat it like a business, and say that its has lasted 5 years, it is successful.

I should have also been more clear, and said mass society.

jesslem wrote:Do you understand what the prefix "A" implies?
Asexual
Atypical
Asymmetric
Adynamic
Ahistorical

Need I go on?

Asexual - not sexual
Atypical - not typical
Asymmetric - not symmetric
Ahistorical - not historical

Atheist - not a theist

Your own argument kind of shot you down there mate

I think you're confusing the prefix with 'anti'. Being asexual doesn't mean you're against sexuality or that you believe sexuality doesn't exist.

lol

Maccaveli wrote:

jesslem wrote:Do you understand what the prefix "A" implies?
Asexual
Atypical
Asymmetric
Adynamic
Ahistorical

Need I go on?

Asexual - not sexual
Atypical - not typical
Asymmetric - not symmetric
Ahistorical - not historical

Atheist - not a theist

Your own argument kind of shot you down there mate

I think you're confusing the prefix with 'anti'. Being asexual doesn't mean you're against sexuality or that you believe sexuality doesn't exist.

I didn't say it did, but you're actually taking it too litterally, none of those words refer to belief in anything, however theism does. There's a difference between a definition and an implication. Yes something that is asymmetic is not symmetric, but that merely describes what it is as a consequence of the definition.

jesslem ur wrong move on please

my name starts with an A :'(

kidshuffle wrote:

DiegoSapiens wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:anarchy is the dumbest political ideology on the planet - from the "sophisticated" university definitions, or the crusty punk definition.

no

Prove me wrong then. Explain why there has never been a successful anarchist society.

there have been some successful anarchist societies but I think that is a system of organization that can only be applied in independent cooperative communities. I have been in some small villages that functions perfectly without head charges and money/exchange. I really think to that there have been a lot of societies that have adopted anarchism naturally along the history of human civilization.

Anyway is not a system that can be applied to a whole country but the role of anarcho syndicalism still very important in our cities imo, because they have to assure that people that don´t accept the social contract can live their way if they don´t bother anyone. You will have to agree that the social contract of actual democracies is a violation of our right of freedom because we sing it when we are born without having the possibility of accept it or not, and freedom is based on choosing without any pressure. How is possible that you can´t live in the forest your way without having to pay? i don´t know if i explained myself correctly... I don´t like the majority of the "sophisticated" definition as you said (that is normally Bakunin´s theory, and bakunin is quite dumb) but i have really enjoyed reading Kropotkin essays, and though if i don´t know if his theories would have success in a society is a very interesting read for his evolutionist and philosophical point of view

in conclusion, i´m not saying that is a perfect system, but is not the dumber one; for me is much more dumber to give your opinions/morals, money, health and freedom to a small group of people that say that they speak in the name of god and that they are in possession of the righteousness while they live with a massive priority over the rest

mIrReN wrote:my name starts with an A :'(

Guess you aint then m8

mIrReN wrote:my name starts with an A :'(

i feel your pain brethren

my name starts with a ray

raytheism

the belief that rayman does not exist

raysexual

Agent 47 wrote:raytheism

the belief that rayman does not exist

That would be the belief that he is God

woow I can't say the word communist on facebook publicly cos it was "reported as offensive by others"

thats a par

jesslem wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:raytheism

the belief that rayman does not exist

That would be the belief that he is God

This is tru