Page 19 of 20

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:23 pm
by wormcode
There's probably some truth to it, the military has admiited to firing on UFOs and there's some of that old footage of the army shooting at something above LA, or a city in Nevada? During or around WW2. Pretty sure they thought it may likely be some German aircraft but it was unidentified.

But yeah that antarctica story just seems like a movie plot to me. Similar to X-Files: Fight the Future actually.

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 1:04 am
by adikt
yeh the antartica story is obviously a smokescreen tactic...but the interesting part of it to me is that the russians were needing to be warned about a possible mention of UFOs in future cables...the speculation comes from one that news fact...like they are the ones who would find it most interesting or something...???

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:44 am
by borrowed
Not this shit again

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:48 am
by Phigure
i want julian assange to rape me

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:12 pm
by hackman
look who assange shares his lawyers (Finers Stephens Innocent) with

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:17 pm
by 2manynoobs
Image


i wanna work for wikileaks!!!

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:18 pm
by hackman

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:03 pm
by HRKRT

-q-

now i dont know what to believe

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:52 pm
by 2manynoobs
ahahaha

maybe the 'conspiracy theorists' are right after all..............;

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:21 pm
by noam
LOL

still never understood all this zionist state bullshit

israel is there as a buffer state in a key strategic point in the middle east, thats the only reason it's there

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:22 pm
by hackman
noam wrote:israel is there as a buffer state in a key strategic point in the middle east, thats the only reason it's there
well exactly

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:33 pm
by Phigure
noam wrote:LOL

still never understood all this zionist state bullshit

israel is there as a buffer state in a key strategic point in the middle east, thats the only reason it's there
nailed it

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:50 pm
by noam
hackman wrote:
noam wrote:israel is there as a buffer state in a key strategic point in the middle east, thats the only reason it's there
well exactly
yeah but its not to do with setting up a zionist state to do with secret societies etc.

i.e. there's no conspiracy behind it aside from the obvious

its essentially the same as the CIA imposed Iranian monarchy in the 50's - its a puppet state. this is uncontroversial, historic fact.

whats the deal with the zionist thing? i genuinely have no idea what they're talking about -r-

as for the rest of the article, one listed source states Murdoch still has a direct hand in writing the lead editorials in his newspaper, the next shows a lead editorial supposedly written by Assange in a Murdoch owned paper, 'The Australian'... and the conspiracy theorists see no problem with this... i thought that would be exactly the kind of thing they would love; seems to be much just as much evidence for murdoch interference as there is for assange shmoozing...

either way its very very messy and is doing on favours for Wikieaks...

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:52 pm
by hackman
noam wrote:
hackman wrote:
noam wrote:israel is there as a buffer state in a key strategic point in the middle east, thats the only reason it's there
well exactly
yeah but its not to do with setting up a zionist state to do with secret societies etc.

i.e. there's no conspiracy behind it aside from the obvious

its essentially the same as the CIA imposed Iranian monarchy in the 50's - its a puppet state. this is uncontroversial, historic fact.

whats the deal with the zionist thing? i genuinely have no idea what they're talking about -r-

as for the rest of the article, one listed source states Murdoch still has a direct hand in writing the lead editorials in his newspaper, the next shows a lead editorial supposedly written by Assange in a Murdoch owned paper, 'The Australian'... and the conspiracy theorists see no problem with this... i thought that would be exactly the kind of thing they would love; seems to be much just as much evidence for murdoch interference as there is for assange shmoozing...

either way its very very messy and is doing on favours for Wikieaks...
i see the zionist thing as the cover/excuse to maintain as much a desperate grip on israel as possible

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:55 pm
by noam
so a false-flag conspiracy to divert attention from the idea of Israel as a buffer state... or have i got lost...

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:58 pm
by hackman
no not divert, it's just more weight
more things to make israel more lawful or justifiable

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:56 am
by Sirius
ya know that whole write up is based on a story coming out of Israel right??
& it has no basis on fact or reality ah!

Israeli propaganda, do yall actually go in and just read the article without following it up?

!!chea

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:11 am
by hackman
everything you just said applies to you

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:21 am
by Badman Juice
israelis are some real-ass jews.

Re: WikiLeaks

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:36 am
by hackman
Sirius wrote:ya know that whole write up is based on a story coming out of Israel right??
& it has no basis on fact or reality ah!

Israeli propaganda, do yall actually go in and just read the article without following it up?

!!chea

what the fuck are you talking about actually?
do you read your posts after making them?

chea