bagelator wrote:murky21 wrote:firky wrote:
If Inception is what passes as 'intellectually stimulating' then no wonder we're living in a word where a Degree in Madonna is actually considered an academic success.
are you trying to say that inception did not make you think? i can guarantee half the great british public saw it, thought as hard as they could and still couldnt work out what the fuck is going on.
Nope. It flatters to deceive. It is merely a facade, like the rest of his films. Interesting ideas, but nothing new. He plays with structure in a nice way in Memento, but really he just played a film in reverse. Is that so controversial and mind blowing? Inception was quite cluttered and clumsy in comparison.
Exactly, when I first saw Inception the first thing I thought was, "this looks very like Paprika, I wonder what Nolan has done with the concept!" so I watched it and was left very disappointed and quite surprised at how audacious Nolan was in his 'inspiration'. Compare it to this where the charachters don't follow a predictable story arc or are so wooden you don't give a shit about them, there's no background to any of them.
I am not sure about half the British public but most of my friend's who's opinions I trust thought pretty much the same thing as me. I know this may sound extremely arrogant and what not, but if you read a few books and watch plenty of none hollywood films you'll end up seeing that there isn't much in Hollywood are in the main stream that is that good!
Inception basically left me unsatisfied, I was expecting something deep with lots of questions and puzzles but all I got was a stolen idea, glammed up in a bad disguise before being subject to a multi-million pound advertising campaign luring into people thinking that it is an intellectual film.