Dubstepforum.com

It's just a T-Shirt animal.

I say either give them to Madonna or dead dem all.

dead rats wrote:There should be a job where you have to suck a panda's dick to get them in the mood.

That would be so sweet.

Pretty sour actually...

i would want to see some hard evidence that man isnt causing all the Pandas problems before we start wiping them out. Nature isnt something to take light heartedly. But i think Hayze had the right idea with giving it to the African children.

Also this seems like a pretty slippery slope to me, with this attitude i would worry that soon enough people would be saying "we dont need any Lions or Leopards or Rhinos..."

-dubson- wrote:i would want to see some hard evidence that man isnt causing all the Pandas problems before we start wiping them out. Nature isnt something to take light heartedly. But i think Hayze had the right idea with giving it to the African children.

Also this seems like a pretty slippery slope to me, with this attitude i would worry that soon enough people would be saying "we dont need any Lions or Leopards or Rhinos..."

Lions fuck all the time. I'm not agreeing to stopping anything that has a healthy determination to get laid. I just don't trust anything which has it's brain so far removed from it's cock as a Panda.

fuck pandas and fuck the police

(panda cars)

also i watched one on planet earth with a mate and he pointed out it had a very poo'y arsehole,,,,disgusting!

fuck em up their poo'y arseholes

magma wrote:

-dubson- wrote:i would want to see some hard evidence that man isnt causing all the Pandas problems before we start wiping them out. Nature isnt something to take light heartedly. But i think Hayze had the right idea with giving it to the African children.

Also this seems like a pretty slippery slope to me, with this attitude i would worry that soon enough people would be saying "we dont need any Lions or Leopards or Rhinos..."

Lions fuck all the time. I'm not agreeing to stopping anything that has a healthy determination to get laid. I just don't trust anything which has it's brain so far removed from it's cock as a Panda.

Yeh cool but if people start thinking keeping species in danger alive is too exspensive and governments are wasting money then i'm not sure whats gonna end up being left.

Maybe they look at eachother the way we look at them and just want to hug eachother all the time?

I'd hug the fuck out a panda but i wouldnt go anywhere near one with a boner, theyre just not sexy, theyre cute!

The panda has more right to be alive than any human...

raposanegra wrote:The panda has more right to be alive than any human...

not on an evolutionary level it doesn't

raposanegra wrote:The panda has more right to be alive than any human...

I reckon Darwin would disagree.

I'm sure we haven't helped their survival, but if we give them enough land and food to increase in numbers and they still don't, then they're just destined to die out. Survival of the fittest doesn't stop altogether just because we think we can control it.

There are hundreds of species of frog dieing out, I don't see them getting so much attention. Why does a big, cuddly, sexless bear get more of a look in than hundreds of other individual species combined?

-dubson- wrote:i would want to see some hard evidence that man isnt causing all the Pandas problems before we start wiping them out. Nature isnt something to take light heartedly. But i think Hayze had the right idea with giving it to the African children.

Also this seems like a pretty slippery slope to me, with this attitude i would worry that soon enough people would be saying "we dont need any Lions or Leopards or Rhinos..."

Pandas have the digestive tracts of carnivores, like other bears. but for watever dumb reason all they eat is bamboo. Some people think it's because bamboo shoots have some sort of alcoholic quality to them, and pandas like gettin drunk, but i'm not sure how valid that is.

Either way pandas are built to digest meat, not bamboo, so it takes them alot more energy to sift watever nutrients out of bamboo they can, so much so that it leaves them so weak they basically eat just to have enough energy to eat more. They can't even hibernate because their bodies don't store enough fat like normal bears. They sleep for twelve hours a day and are too tired/lazy to mate. When they do mate, their babies are born blind and weak, and all they have to nourish on is mommas rancid bamboo teat milk, so alot of the babies don't survive.

That's about the size of it, I'm pretty sure humans are actually trying to keep them alive and getting them mating, but the big dummies just love bamboo too much. Should we be spending money trying to save a species that's killing itself cuz its dumb?

tronn wrote:

-dubson- wrote:i would want to see some hard evidence that man isnt causing all the Pandas problems before we start wiping them out. Nature isnt something to take light heartedly. But i think Hayze had the right idea with giving it to the African children.

Also this seems like a pretty slippery slope to me, with this attitude i would worry that soon enough people would be saying "we dont need any Lions or Leopards or Rhinos..."

Pandas have the digestive tracts of carnivores, like other bears. but for watever dumb reason all they eat is bamboo. Some people think it's because bamboo shoots have some sort of alcoholic quality to them, and pandas like gettin drunk, but i'm not sure how valid that is.

Either way pandas are built to digest meat, not bamboo, so it takes them alot more energy to sift watever nutrients out of bamboo they can, so much so that it leaves them so weak they basically eat just to have enough energy to eat more. They can't even hibernate because their bodies don't store enough fat like normal bears. They sleep for twelve hours a day and are too tired/lazy to mate. When they do mate, their babies are born blind and weak, and all they have to nourish on is mommas rancid bamboo teat milk, so alot of the babies don't survive.

That's about the size of it, I'm pretty sure humans are actually trying to keep them alive and getting them mating, but the big dummies just love bamboo too much. Should we be spending money trying to save a species that's killing itself cuz its dumb?

well if thats all true its time they wiped themselves out then...

baron_von_carlton wrote:We should eat them.
I'm down for a nice slow roasted leg of Panda.

Panda ankles?

kins83 wrote:

lil-tee wrote:

magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.

Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.

FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS

to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck.

To be fair though, there's millions of us. We can afford to be picky. For each individual panda, the fate of its entire species rests on it getting laid. Maybe it's the pressure of the situation that gives them bedroom troubles?

If the fate of the human race rests on who i fuck i would be so happy all them females coming my way.

raposanegra wrote:The panda has more right to be alive than any human...

No they don't! A world where Pandas have the inalienable right to life and Humans don't would be the shittest world ever. Widespread torture and suffering of humanity with nothing but a few smelly, lumbering, sexless, animatronic looking, tree-arse wiping damp old teddy bears for comfort? What a barrel of fun that would be.

one of the worst threads in the history of humanity tbh.

Everything in nature is beautiful and it is no less beautiful because it is understood. However, the unenlightened man will assign arbitrary values to all things in order to protect and justify his own position. His morals are based on things he wishes were true or which someone else wishes were true. His philosophy pays no attention to relative facts or realities and yet in his life he must deal with them. He is consequently involved in a constant round of pretenses and evasions.
Jack Parsons

seriously if you think that pandas are not evolutionarily "fit" to survive, you're a complete failure of a human being and you have ZERO concept of the way evolution actually functions.

They should all be shot on site !!!

Panda burgers FTW!!!!!

u crazy man